What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 12, 2013 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great point shooting front. Too bad for the blurred in the foreground that captures the attention Ottimo il punto di ripresa frontale. Peccato per la parte sfocata in primo piano che cattura l'attenzione |
| sent on December 12, 2013 (21:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Nymphalidae for criticism. Within the limits of the situations definitely keep you more aware of this possible visual distraction. Besides the antennae very long, fully stretched forward toward the lens, not only increase the effect that you've pointed out.
Hello, Luca Grazie Nymphalidae per la critica. Nei limiti delle situazioni terrò sicuramente più conto di questa eventuale distrazione visiva. Oltretutto le antenne molto lunghe, completamente protese in avanti verso la lente, non fanno che aumentare l'effetto che hai sottolineato.
Ciao, Luca |
| sent on December 12, 2013 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also like the shot and I agree with the Nymphalidae, but I think that closing the aperture of +, since there is a good parallelism, it would probably be difficult to put everything in focus with a single shot at that distance the pdc is very small. (Imho) ;-) Greetings Anche a me piace lo scatto e sono d'accordo con Nymphalidae, ma credo che anche chiudendo di + il diaframma, non essendoci un buon parallelismo, sarebbe probabilmente difficile mettere tutto a fuoco con un unico scatto, a quella distanza la pdc è pochissima. (imho)Un saluto |
| sent on December 12, 2013 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Giancarlo, unfortunately, with more closures (over f/16 sharpness begins to fall) you can not have any animal in focus while maintaining a high ratio. Consider that from the tip of the antennae (which are usually held outstretched) and the tip of the last pair of legs modified (normally kept leaned back) this house centipede exceeded 10 cm. Also a side-must take account of at least 3 cm in pdc. Without considering my inexperience then that obviously weighs heavily on my shots :)
Hello, Luca Grazie Giancarlo, purtroppo anche con maggiori chiusure (oltre f/16 la nitidezza inizia a cascare) non è possibile avere tutto l'animale a fuoco mantenendo un alto rapporto di riproduzione. Considera che dalla punta delle antenne (che solitamente sono tenute protese in avanti) e la punta dell'ultimo paio di zampe modificate (tenute normalmente protese indietro) questa scutigera superava i 10 cm. Anche una ripresa laterale deve tenere conto di almeno 3 cm di pdc. Senza considerare poi la mia inesperienza che ovviamente influisce pesantemente sui miei scatti :)
Ciao, Luca |
| sent on December 13, 2013 (5:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful ... I really like it! Bella... mi piace molto!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
