What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 27, 2013 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Mailasia, beautiful clouds that look like feathers on the left. There is a little 'noise.
Missing the shooting data. Ciao Mailasia, belle le nuvole sulla sx che sembrano piume. C'è un po' di rumore.
Mancano i dati di scatto. |
| sent on November 27, 2013 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Now I put them! but how can I do to correct the noise x is a grade my fault! : Fconfuso: mistake to set the iso? Shunkaha thanks! ;-) adesso li ho messi! ma come posso fare x correggere il rumore è un mio grade difetto!  sbaglio ad impostare gli iso? grazie Shunkaha! |
| sent on November 27, 2013 (22:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The lower the ISO the less noise there is, the problem is that freehand is often not much you can lower the ISO otherwise the time is likely to be too slow with the consequence of having the pictures move.
Alternatively you can remove the noise in PP, take a look here:
[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=it&article=23 Più bassi sono gli ISO meno rumore c'è,il problema è che a mano libera spesso non puoi abbassare più di tanto gli ISO altrimenti il tempo rischia di essere troppo lento con la conseguenza di avere la foto mossa.
In alternativa il rumore lo puoi togliere in PP,dai un'occhiata qui:
www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=it&article=23 |
| sent on November 27, 2013 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much Mark! put data to another shooting pictures like you asked! in fact I was at sea on a ship and stand always cheat cheating ......... :-( :-( grazie mille Marco! messi i dati di scatto all'altra foto come mi hai chiesto! in effetti ero in mare su di una nave e il cavalletto imbrogliava.........imbroglia sempre |
| sent on November 27, 2013 (22:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Normally the time, to avoid the risk of camera shake, it should more or less correspond to the focal length of the lens, but on full frame cameras at full size, however it is your one APSC so you have to multiply by 1.5 (eg objective 50 mm.su FF with APSC becomes 75 mm. ie 50 x 1.5) and then in this case with 1/500 the margin was wide. Di norma il tempo, per evitare il rischio di mosso, dovrebbe corrispondere più o meno alla lunghezza focale dell'obiettivo,questo però su fotocamere Full Frame a pieno formato,la tua però è una APSC quindi devi moltiplicare per 1,5(es. obiettivo da 50 mm.su FF con APSC diventa 75 mm. cioè 50 x 1,5)quindi in questo caso con 1/500 il margine era ampio. |
user24517 | sent on November 30, 2013 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very impressive Molto suggestiva |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
