JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 25, 2011 (23:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see the micromasso on the subject, I would also opatato for the subject placed lower in the frame (as it is not reflected in the way) ... a photo cmq pleasant. Hello Simone Vedo del micromasso sul soggetto, avrei inoltre opatato per il soggetto posto più in basso nel fotogramma(visto che il riflesso nell'acqua non è inciso)...una foto cmq gradevole. Ciao Simone
sent on October 25, 2011 (23:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello simone. Thanks for the comment! The shake-nn I see it too, but I understand why if I took in 1/500 and 250mm. Can you tell me something? In several photos I get a shake or are not perfectly sharp despite shutter speeds high enough. Ciao simone. Grazie del commento! Il micromosso lo vedo anch'io ma nn capisco perchè se ho scattato a 1/500 e a 250mm. Sai dirmi qualcosa? In diverse foto mi viene il micromosso o non sono perfettamente nitide nonostante tempi di scatto abbastanza alti.
sent on October 26, 2011 (17:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Hello simone. Thanks for the comment! The shake-nn I see it too, but I understand why if I took in 1/500 and 250mm. Can you tell me something? In several photos I get a shake or are not perfectly sharp despite shutter speeds high enough.
„
These factors can be many, first of all you need a good tripod with a good head (which he mentions) let us know what you are using or if you have taken freehand
hello Danilo " Ciao simone. Grazie del commento! Il micromosso lo vedo anch'io ma nn capisco perchè se ho scattato a 1/500 e a 250mm. Sai dirmi qualcosa? In diverse foto mi viene il micromosso o non sono perfettamente nitide nonostante tempi di scatto abbastanza alti.
"
I fattori possono essere tanti,innazitutto ci vuole un buon cavalletto con un ottima testa(cosa che non menzioni) facci sapere cosa usi o se hai scattato a mano libera
sent on October 26, 2011 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Daniel, thanks for the comment. In this photo I did not use a tripod I did it freehand. Well .. I still have to equip myself for a tripod. I have one but it is not great! I do not know if it could possibly be a limit to the sharpness of the machine ..... Ciao Danilo, grazie per il commento. In questa foto non ho usato un cavalletto l'ho fatta a mano libera. Beh..per il cavalletto devo ancora attrezzarmi. Ne ho uno ma non è un granchè!! Non so se potrebbe magari essere un limite della macchina la nitidezza.....
sent on October 27, 2011 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know the machine and optics used by you but not attribuirei to shake them ... certainly, says Danilo Bassani, it is always advisable a sturdy tripod and a good head for the photos ... sopprattutto fauna ... plus there are several other factors that influence the final result as the shutter speed and the movement of the subject more or less fast .... Hello Simone Non conosco la macchina e l'ottica da te usate ma non attribuirei a loro il micromosso...sicuramente, come dice Danilo Bassani, è sempre consigliabile un robusto cavalletto e una buona testa...sopprattutto per le foto alla fauna...in più ci sono diversi altri fattori che influenzano il risultato finale come i tempi di scatto e il movimento più o meno veloce del soggetto.... Ciao Simone
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
