What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 245000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 16, 2013 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A little 'small to evaluate the goodness of sharpness. Compositionally I would have preferred a vertical shooting to include the flower beheaded.
At least at the level of cloning could be to remove the faded flower on the side of that taken into view, it seems a bit 'ugly. Un po' piccola per valutare la bontà della nitidezza. Compositivamente avrei preferito una ripresa verticale per includere il fiore decapitato.
Almeno a livello di clonatura si sarebbe potuto togliere il fiore appassito al fianco di quello preso in visione, mi sembra un po' antiestetico. |
| sent on May 16, 2013 (12:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for visiting pigi47, I wanted to point out that the size of this flower and a little more the size of a small lentil then call it well already as seen in nature and as you can see in the photo, I believe the difference and abnormal flower beheaded ? The flower that you say beheaded, one who is over the subject that I photographed was dry, so I decided to exclude him from the scene and photograph the 'single flower which in my opinion was the most beautiful I've done this cut Only because I wanted not those who watched was lost to look more into the scene but that he would immediately framed the flower that is the main subject, the withered flower is absolutely right take it off in a PP ...
Thanks for the comment and the visit, hello, Michele Grazie della visita pigi47, volevo precisare che la dimensione di questo fiorellino e poco piu della dimensione di una lenticchia quindi chiamarla piccola beh già da come la si vede in natura e di come si vede nella foto, mi creda la differenza e abnorme, fiore decapitato? Il fiore che lei dice decapitato ossia quello che si trova sopra il soggetto che ho fotografato era secco, ho preferito quindi escluderlo dalla scena e fotografare l' unico fiorellino che a mio parere era piu bello, ho fatto questo taglio xke volevo che chi guardava non si perdeva a guardare altro nella scena ma che avrebbe subito inquadrato il fiore ossia il soggetto principale, per il fiore appassito ha pienamente ragione lo toglierò in pp...
Grazie del commento e della visita, ciao, Michele |
| sent on May 16, 2013 (13:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
flower very special
hello. fiore molto particolare
ciao. |
| sent on May 16, 2013 (13:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for your visit and comment, hello Michele Grazie della visita e del commento, ciao Michele |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
