What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 05, 2021 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Amazing photo!
Seventions
Gionskj
Foto straordinaria!
Complimenti vivissimi
Gionskj
|
| sent on May 06, 2021 (0:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it extraordinary La trovo straordinaria |
| sent on May 06, 2021 (8:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gionskj, thanks Edobette, really kind. Grazie Gionskj, Grazie Edobette, troppo gentili. |
| sent on May 06, 2021 (14:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think there's a bit of micromote due to the rather long time, but the atmosphere is really warm and very nice. credo ci sia un po' di micromosso dovuto al tempo piuttosto lungo, ma l'atmosfera è davvero calda e molto bella. |
| sent on May 06, 2021 (14:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very true Andrea, the time is long for a freehand shot, but given the type and atmosphere I thought it could be there. Thank you for your intervention. Verissimo Andrea, il tempo si posa è lunghetto per uno scatto a mano libera, ma vista la tipologia e l'atmosfera ho pensato che ci potesse stare. Grazie per il tuo intervento. |
| sent on May 08, 2021 (8:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful especially for the blurry. Good choice to leave the diaphragm completely open, a greeting. Vincent Bellissima soprattutto per lo sfocato. Buona la scelta di lasciare il diaframma del tutto aperto.un saluto. Vincenzo |
| sent on May 08, 2021 (8:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Vincenzo, very kind, the opening of the diaphragm was a must not to go down too much with time but befits the type of shot, here sharpness is not required and increases the blurry effect ;-) Ti ringrazio Vincenzo, molto gentile, l'apertura del diaframma è stata una scelta obbligata per non scendere troppo con il tempo ma si addice al tipo di scatto, qui la nitidezza non è richiesta ed aumenta l'effetto sfocato  |
| sent on June 01, 2021 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Always beautiful candles, fascinating colors! Here you composed excellently, but perhaps I would have left the first floor a little more readable with a diaphragm a little more closed. But I like it, good Riccardo ;-) Sempre belle le candele, colori affascinanti! Qui hai composto ottimamente, ma forse avrei lasciato un po' più leggibile il primo piano con un diaframma un poco più chiuso. Ma mi piace, bravo Riccardo |
| sent on June 02, 2021 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Fedrico, the observation is as always right, but not wanting to go up too much are the ISOs I was forced to use the maximum openness. Grazie mille Fedrico, l'osservazione è come sempre giusta, ma non volendo salire troppo son gli ISO sono stato costretto ad usare la massima apertura. |
| sent on June 02, 2021 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ah ok now I understand. Maybe Sony isn't stabilized? Because with the Olyumpus, but also with the Pana, I can shoot serenely freehand up to 1/15 (clear that the focal point also counts, but here it is very short), to which I could have closed the diaphragm of a stop without raising the iso. That then in this scene who knows... it's dark, so the noise you'd see more, but it's blurry so the noise reduction is less noticeable... dunno...
In any case at 16mm even without stabilization it may be that at 1/15 you can go down. Ah ok ora capisco. Forse la Sony non è stabilizzata? Perché con la Olyumpus, ma anche con la Pana, posso scattare sereno a mano libera fino a 1/15 (chiaro che conta anche la focale, ma qui è assai corta), al che io avrei potuto chiudere il diaframma di uno stop senza alzare gli iso. Che poi in questa scena chissà... è scura, quindi il rumore si vedrebbe di più, ma è sfocata quindi la riduzione rumore si nota di meno... boh...
In ogni caso a 16mm pure senza stabilizzazione può essere che a 1/15 si possa scendere. |
| sent on June 02, 2021 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sony is stabilized but I can't get to 1/15, 1/25 is already a half miracle :-P La sony è stabilizzata ma io a mano libera non riesco ad arrivare ad 1/15, 1/25 è già un mezzo miracolo  |
| sent on June 02, 2021 (22:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So either she's stabilized little or you have to stop having breakfast with Sangiovese :-D Allora o lei è stabilizzata poco o tu devi smetterla di fare colazione col Sangiovese  |
| sent on June 02, 2021 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Actually I like Sangiovese, and also quite a good Tuscan, but at breakfast only fruit juices :-P Effettivamente il Sangiovese mi piace, ed anche parecchio da buon Toscano, ma a colazione solo succhi di frutta |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
