What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 22, 2013 (23:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
that detail would raise the lights a little hello ;-) che dettaglio,alzerei un pò le luci ciao |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (0:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks :-) Moth
X lights I made several attempts, this was what I liked more, I tend to leave the moon dark enough :-) Grazie Falena
X le luci ho fatto diversi tentativi, questo era quello che mi piaceva di piu, personalmente tendo a lasciare la luna abbastanza scura |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (8:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
what to say? I want to start astronomical photos ^ _ ^ big congratulations! che dire?? mi viene voglia di iniziare a foto astronomiche ^_^ grossi complimenti!! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (9:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark :-) Nowadays, start with a basic setup for astrophotography, it is not impossible as 20 years ago, so why not try it! at least to see if they like it or not :-) Grazie Marco Al giorno d'oggi, iniziare con un setup base per astrofotografia, non è improponibile come 20 anni fa, quindi perchè non provarci! almeno per vedere se piace o no |
user15434 | sent on February 24, 2013 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful as usual,
David Bellissima come al solito,
Davide |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (12:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks David :-) Grazie Davide |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
See the craters on the moon is always cool, but the jagged black that frames ruin
detracts from the aesthetics of the picture ...
Maybe two linear bands on the diagonal would be more effective, or a cut normal type overview
with straightening and horizontal development.
Oh, please note that I have not the faintest idea of ??the difficulties in making this kind of picture
(And the fact that they are not reported shooting data does not help me), but the result, I find it to be penalized.
Congratulations anyway for the idea, study and attempt ... ;-)
Vedere i crateri lunari è sempre fico, ma la scalettatura nera che fa da cornice rovina
irrimediabilmente l'estetica della foto...
Forse due bande lineari in diagonale sarebbero più efficaci, oppure un taglio tipo normale panoramica
con raddrizzamento e sviluppo in orizzontale.
Oh, considera che non ho la più vaga idea delle difficoltà nel realizzare questo tipo di foto
(e il fatto che non siano riportati i dati di scatto non mi aiuta), ma il risultato, trovo venga penalizzato.
Complimenti comunque per l'idea, lo studio e il tentativo...
|
| sent on February 24, 2013 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and comment Prof Chaos.
I'll tell you, 90% of mosaics made on the moon in high resolution, especially in areas so large, have cut the frame resulting in "empty", this is due to several factors, one of which is the time, or on the moon has a maximum time of recovery is around 20 minutes, after which the shadows change ... Another problem is the small sensor that is used, in high resolution sensors are used in a majority of 640 X 480, but also those who use sensors of 1280 X 960 still has the same problems (even if the mosaic is more extended).
I do not know if you've ever made images with a telescope working in yards and yards of focal sensors 640 X 480, but I guarantee you that the "anchors" that you have to take hundreds and hundreds to compose such a half-moon, and in questor if they are only 5 .... a bit like using a 600 mm telephoto lens to shoot a wide-field view :-)
If you look at the composition of the image seen as beauty of the shot, then you're absolutely right that the clippings are bad, but in astrophotography Hig-res looks more to detail that you can not solve, so cut the craters resolved to make more pleasant the 'image, usually not done, unless the edges are not damaged .. Grazie del passaggio e del commento Prof Chaos.
Ti dirò, il 90 % dei mosaici fatti sulla luna in alta risoluzione, soprattutto di zone così ampie, presentano il taglio dei fotogrammi con conseguenti "vuoti", questo è dovuto a diversi fattori, uno dei quali è il tempo, ovvero sulla luna si ha un tempo massimo di ripresa che si aggira sui 20 minuti, dopo di chè le ombre cambiano... altro problema è il piccolo sensore che si usa, nell alta risoluzione si usano in maggioranza sensori da 640 X 480, ma anche chi usa sensori di 1280 X 960 ha comunque gli stessi problemi (anche se il mosaico viene piu esteso).
Non so se hai mai fatto immagini con un telescopio lavorando a metri e metri di focale con sensori da 640 X 480,ma ti garantisco che i "tasselli" che bisogna riprendere sono centinaia e centinaia per comporre ad esempio una mezza luna, e in questo caso sono solo 5....un po come usare un teleobiettivo da 600 mm per riprendere un panorama a largo campo
Se si guarda alla composizione dell immagine intesa come bellezza dello scatto, allora hai perfettamente ragione che i ritagli siano pessimi, ma in astrofotografia Hig-res si guarda piu al dettaglio che si riesce a risolvere, pertanto tagliare dei crateri risolti per rendere piu gradevole l'immagine, solitamente non si fa, a meno che i bordi non siano rovinati.. |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (20:03)
Very nice, awesome job! |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks :-) 1000 Bondjames Grazie 1000 Bondjames |
user16120 | sent on February 25, 2013 (9:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great job 8-)! Ottimo lavoro  ! |
| sent on February 25, 2013 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks :-) 1000 Maia Grazie 1000 Maia |
| sent on February 27, 2013 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Fabio, I do not fully follow you, because I've never touched a telescope,
However, you renew the compliments for the type of photos you do ...
Sometimes it is nice to see new types of photography ... ;-)
Until next time ... Ciao Fabio, non credo di seguirti pienamente, visto che non ho mai toccato un telescopio,
però ti rinnovo i complimenti per il tipo di foto che fai...
Ogni tanto è bello vedere nuovi generi fotografici...
Alla prossima... |
| sent on February 27, 2013 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks again prof :-)
for any clarification, Chidi quietly. Grazie ancora prof
per qualsiasi chiarimento, chidi tranquillamente. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
