JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
You can buy an usage license for this photo. For info and prices contact Rubacolor at the e-mail manonimacro@virgilio.it ; specify the title of the photo that you want and the usage that you request.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on July 20, 2020 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A central shot with a fire on the paw wing eye perhaps a more closed diaphragm would have improved the image. See away from your standards. Uno scatto centrale con un fuoco su zampa ala occhio forse un diaframma più chiuso avrebbe migliorato l'immagine. Scatto lontano dai tuoi standard.
sent on July 20, 2020 (14:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very well note these errors. If you look closely, however, the fire in addition to the paw is also on the eye and the pens of the body. Molto bene notare questi errori. Se guardi bene però il fuoco oltre alla zampetta è anche sull'occhio e le penne del corpo.
sent on July 20, 2020 (15:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ with a fire on the paw wing of the eye „
also corrected part of the body. I didn't mean to make any criticism is just my IMHO view " con un fuoco su zampa ala occhio" corretto anche parte del corpo. Non intendevo assolutamente fare critiche è solo il mio punto di vista IMHO
sent on July 20, 2020 (15:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But of course Marco would not want to make controversy but put so it seemed that it was only focusing on the paw. I posted it believing to fall within the quality standard not mine but of the forum where it is often said beautiful even with completely blurred or grainy shots especially those concerning this lens that I used. Probably even closing at f 16 the beak put so it wouldn't have been all in focus. It was necessary to stay further away and crop as I resumed the goal behaved as in macro. Focus tracking couldn't be done. Just take it as my opinion! Hello and thank you for the sincerity that always wins. Ma certo Marco non vorrei far polemiche ma messa così sembrava che fosse a fuoco solo la zampetta. L'ho postata credendo di rientrare nello standard qualitativo non mio ma del forum dove spesso si dice bella anche a scatti completamente sfocati o sgranati specie quelli riguardanti questa lente che ho usato. Probabilmente anche chiudendo a f 16 il becco messo così non sarebbe stato tutto a fuoco. Occorreva stare più lontani e croppare così come ho ripreso io l'obiettivo si è comportato come in macro. Il focus tracking non si poteva fare. Prendila solo come mia opinione! Ciao e grazie per la sincerità che vince sempre.
sent on April 20, 2025 (10:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The depth of field is important with these teles, I think that the good compromise is obtained at f11 la profondità di campo è importante con questi tele, mi sa che il buon compromesso lo si ottiene a f11
sent on April 20, 2025 (17:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Naturman: I remember that the PDC depends on many factors common to all lenses, especially telephoto lenses like this and among these there is the lens/subject distance. I was very close and maybe f22 wasn't even enough. Naturman: Ricordo che la pdc dipende da tanti fattori comuni a tutti gli obiettivi specie tele some questo e fra queste c'è la distanza lente/soggetto. Ero vicinissimo e forse non bastava nemmeno f22.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
