What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 21, 2012 (6:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a good result
good
hello un buon risultato bravo ciao |
| sent on December 21, 2012 (7:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, although I am aware that the maf is not precise and there will definitely be other defects. Grazie, anche se sono cosciente che la maf non è precisa e sicuramente ci saranno altri difetti. |
| sent on December 21, 2012 (11:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Forgive me, but I think the big mistake, is basically the use of pipes to get more rr without the use of a tripod. I believe that only a few can do it. How can you see the same image lacks sharpness. Perdonami, ma penso che il grosso errore sia principalmente quello d'usare i tubi per ottenere maggiori rr senza l'uso di un cavalletto. Credo che solo pochissimi possano farlo. Come puoi tu stesso constatare l'immagine è carente di nitidezza. |
| sent on December 21, 2012 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but with 1/200 the photo should not be moved. però con 1/200 la foto non dovrebbe venire mossa. |
| sent on December 22, 2012 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I confirm: the blur of the photographer is not a problem in this type of photo. The only problem is the reduced pdc that deserve a staking a couple of shots (and, of course, free to hand it takes a lot factor c.).
I like a lot, bravo! Confermo: il mosso del fotografo non è un problema in questo tipo di foto. L'unico problema è la ridotta pdc che meriterebbe uno staking di un paio di scatti (ed, ovviamente, a mano libero ci vuole parecchio fattore c.). A me piace molto, bravo! |
| sent on December 24, 2012 (2:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
mino is not moved but as you say the focus falls on the legs and the sharpness of the 18-55 after a while made me unhappy trying other lenses, looking around a bit I read is seen that the pentax was strong reversed, one day I had the blow of c ** or trovallo:-P ... and another thing that is really the pdc reduced at least there vole a stack of 2 photos mino non è mossa ma come dici tu il fuoco cade sulle zampe e la nitidezza del 18-55 dopo un pò mi ha reso insoddisfatto cercando altre ottiche, guardando un pò in giro ho letto è visto che il pentax andava forte invertito , un giorno ho avuto la botta di c**o di trovallo ...un altra cosa e la pdc che è veramente ridotta come minimo ci vole uno stack di 2 foto |
| sent on March 25, 2013 (23:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The lack of sharpness is not due to a blur but at a reduced pdc and the equipment used nothing more 'could do, focus stacking unthinkable freehand.
piero La carenza di nitidezza non à dovuta al mosso ma ad una ridotta pdc e con l'attrezzatura usata nulla in piu' potevi fare, focus stacking impensabile a mano libera. piero |
| sent on February 18, 2014 (7:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the subject, the lack of sharpness in my opinion is due to 'objective and to' the absence of a tripod. Quoto to focus stracking Mi piace il soggetto, la carenza di nitidezza secondo me e` dovuta all' obiettivo e all' assenza di un cavalletto. Quoto per il focus stracking |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |