JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 18, 2018 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The subject is underexposed and shake-free. I do not know if you had room for recovery but it was better to raise the ISO, open the diaphragm and overexpose at least 1/3 stop. Any digital noise reduced it only around the subject. (Imho) When you have 2 minutes, as per regulation, update the caption field by writing: "subject taken in amb.controllato". The #Acquario tag is now available, you can add it to your photos by entering #Acquario in the caption; remember to always leave an empty space after the hashtag. Hi, laurel Il soggetto è sottoesposto e micromosso. Non so se avevi margini di ripresa ma era preferibile alzare gli iso, aprire il diaframma e sovraesporre di almeno 1/3 di stop. L'eventuale rumore digitale lo riducevi solo intorno al soggetto. (imho) Quando hai 2 minuti, come da regolamento, aggiorna il campo didascalia scrivendo: "soggetto ripreso in amb.controllato" . Il tag #Acquario è ora disponibile, puoi aggiungerlo alle tue foto inserendo #Acquario nella didascalia; ricordati di lasciare sempre uno spazio vuoto dopo l'hashtag. Ciao, lauro
sent on February 18, 2018 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had little room for maneuver and I was at 1600 use .. For underexposure I agree with you but it was hidden under a rock. And with the very thick glass they created strange effects .. cmq thanks for the advice. Avevo poco spazio di manovra ed ero a 1600 uso.. Per la sottoesposizione ti dò ragione ma era nascosto sotto un masso. E con il vetro spessissimo si creavano effetti strani .. cmq grazie per i consigli.
sent on February 18, 2018 (16:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The best result can be obtained by applying the lens hood to the optic and placing it on the glass so as not to have parasitic light and maintain a perfect parallelism between the sensor and the glass (see the refraction heading) ;-) Il miglior risultato lo possiamo ottenere applicando il paraluce all'ottica e appoggiandolo al vetro in modo da non avere luce parassita e mantenere un perfetto parallelismo tra piano sensore e vetro (vedi voce rifrazione)
sent on February 18, 2018 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes I know .. but when you find yourself with 40 people in front of the glass watching the puppy that is just born is hard .. damn me that I went on Saturday. Sì quello lo so.. ma quando ti ritrovi con 40 persone davanti al vetro a guardare il cucciolo che è appena nato è dura.. mannaggia a me che sono andato di sabato.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
