What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 13, 2012 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like the light and colors, decentralized I left and closed a little 'the diaphragm to gain clarity on the wings. Hello Ivan Mi piace molto la luce e i colori, avrei decentrato a sinistra e chiuso ancora un po' il diaframma per guadagnare nitidezza sulle ali. Ciao Ivan |
| sent on September 13, 2012 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A small flaw turns out to be the composition, in this case too central. The other problem is the loss of sharpness on the wing in the second floor. Not having written the shooting data leads us to make assumptions. The loss of detail may depend on the use of a diaphragm insufficient to give the pdc necessary, or to a not perfect parallelism. Una piccola pecca risulta essere la composizione, in questo caso troppo centrale. L'altro problema è la perdita di nitidezza sull'ala in secondo piano. Il non aver scritto i dati di scatto porta a fare supposizioni. La perdita del dettaglio può dipendere dall'utilizzo di un diaframma insufficiente a darti la pdc necessaria, oppure ad un non perfetto parallelismo. |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then the details of shot are: Tv 1/500, Av 8.0, ISO 200, taken with a 90mm macro and a canon 400d.
I hope you can help me to understand exactly the error for the out of focus of the wings ..
Thank you! Allora le info di scatto sono: Tv 1/500, Av 8.0, ISO 200, scattata con un 90mm macro e una canon 400d.
Spero mi possa aiutare a capire di preciso l'errore per la mancata messa a fuoco delle ali..
Grazie! |
| sent on October 07, 2012 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How far were you from the subject, the butterfly? if you are very very close, even an f / 8 is likely to squeeze just a little depth of field enough to sfocarti other plans visuals, especially with a macro. The shutter speed in this case I do not fit in 1/500 should be sufficient, as you would have noticed a shake if the worm had shaken embellished the wing!
In fact, now that I'm doing the event, look at the antennae, left and right as they come out of the field of focus, you see? :) A che distanza eri dal soggetto, dalla farfalla? se sei molto molto vicina, anche un f/8 rischia di stringerti poco poco la profondità di campo quanto basta per sfocarti altri piani visuali, specie con un macro. La velocità di scatto in questo caso penso non c'entri, a 1/500 dovrebbe esser sufficiente, al più avresti notato un micromosso se il verme imbellito avesse scosso l'ala!
Anzi, ora che ci faccio caso, guarda le antenne, destra e sinistra come vengono in fuori dal campo di messa a fuoco, vedi? :) |
| sent on October 08, 2012 (11:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes .. I was very close .. si.. ero molto vicina.. |
| sent on November 10, 2012 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful subject for defects have already 'said.
greetings ale Bellissimo soggetto, per i difetti hanno già' detto.
saluti ale |
| sent on November 10, 2012 (18:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with the above steps
with a few tricks you will come to great results ;-)
Hello Diego
concordo con i passaggi precedenti
con pochi accorgimenti arriverai a grandi risultati
ciao Diego
|
| sent on November 10, 2012 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have often had the opportunity to comment on your photos with naturdie agree that you can do with a little leap. I would stand almost obligatory and some alzataccia when the light is low then you once told me not to be so lazy strength. the subject is splendid for its lack of precision in a wire maf. very good however the colors and the background. hello flavio spesso ho avuto modo di commentare le tue foto concordo con naturdie che con poco puoi fare salto di qualità. cavalletto direi quasi obbligato e qualche alzataccia quando la luce è bassa poi tu una volta mi hai detto di non essere pigra quindi forza. il soggetto è splendido di suo manca un filo di precisione nella maf. molto buoni invece i colori e lo sfondo. ciao flavio |
| sent on November 10, 2012 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the support! it is true .. the stand is required .. but we have a good relationship, I limited the movements .. actually I just do not coordinate well together in time before the subject escape ... :-( grazie per il supporto! si è vero.. il cavalletto è obbligatorio.. ma non abbiamo un buon rapporto, mi limita nei movimenti.. in realtà sono io che non coordino bene il tutto in tempo prima che il soggetto scappi... |
| sent on June 08, 2013 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful both photo and butterfly. Bellissimi sia la foto che la farfalla. |
| sent on June 11, 2013 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Roberto! Grazie mille Roberto! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
