RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Who is he?...

Nikon Df

View gallery (28 photos)

Who is he? sent on February 02, 2017 (23:56) by Riccardo.asselta. 18 comments, 614 views. [retina]

1/1000 f/2.8, ISO 100,




View High Resolution 16.2 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 02, 2018 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Riccardo is an interesting idea but the maf seems wrong to me. The title suggests the link of the photo with the padlock but it is out of focus so it loses a little 'sense the photo. Also I seem to glimpse a female figure in the background: in my opinion it would have been appropriate to close the diaphragm in order to have a background so blurry but readable. This would have been the icing on the cake to complete the link with the title. With these two tricks it would have been a beautiful street.

avatarsupporter
sent on January 02, 2018 (14:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Philip of the passage

user137840
avatar
sent on January 02, 2018 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

therefore, let's analyze the three main actors of this photo:
1) the padlocks as a metaphor of eternal love.
2) the man abandoned by his beloved.
3) Colosseum, or Rome as a theater where the drama takes place:

orbit, by turning these three elements you can build a million love stories more or less poignant.
the songs of our Italian 'tear-loss' repertoire, then they are wasted! one above all:

Goodbye, Rome
Good bye, au revoir
.....
and back to that sciumachella
who was so beautiful and who always told you noooo

avatarsenior
sent on January 02, 2018 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

My interpretation is related to the second smallest lock attached to the first: something more that should not be there. The blurred subject I can not interpret it as a man, but the fact that it moves away from the composition another point of reflection.
I agree on the error of focusing, unless you want to communicate a parallel between the subject above and the padlocks: a feeling that begins to get lost and slowly moves away. In fact at a first glance I would have preferred the locks on fire.
Beautiful black and white, perhaps a little 'too bright at the level of the sky. They disturb the dark lines a bit on the right edge of the colosseum and on the window in the middle at the top: maybe a pp error?

avatarsenior
sent on January 02, 2018 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo of the padlocks is a classic evergreen, the composition is not bad, the realization is less precise ... there are areas of the sky at the edge of the burnt, the MAF is wrong, the padlocks are blurred (maybe it was better to take a half step back and close the diaphragm to f4).
David

user137840
avatar
sent on January 02, 2018 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... sorry Riccardo if in my first comment I gave you the impression of being a bit 'geeky, but with that title I thought you wanted to bring us back to the famous' triangle' sung by Renato Zero. : - /
now I try to be more refined: the one that most penalizes the photo for me is not so much the lack of focus on the padlocks but the little definition of the man (or woman?) in the background. that figure so strongly blurred and undefined ended up becoming a disturbing element, while it must have been the 'counter-position' of the scene.
however, the idea of ??\ u200b \ u200bthe maximum worked, deserves a new attempt ... quiet, the Colosseum are not going to move it ... at least for now :-D

avatarsenior
sent on January 03, 2018 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

definitely an original riccardo photo!
however, I notice the problems of focusing.
I would have used a more closed diaphragm to have the whole lock in focus and make the background more legible.

avatarjunior
sent on January 03, 2018 (21:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The maf is a little 'uncertain for me, it seems to fall on the stone under the locks, leaving out all the elements that should participate in the story.Pero the idea is not bad, the pdr interesting and then try again ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on January 03, 2018 (21:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the composition, as already said by others I would have closed a little to focus on the padlocks and the pillar where the ring is anchored.

avatarjunior
sent on January 04, 2018 (11:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice idea.
I agree with those who suggest you to close the diaphragm a little more, to have greater depth of field on the foreground subject and to have it completely in focus in order to better attract the eye without distractions.

user72446
avatar
sent on January 04, 2018 (23:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A photo showing the Colosseum from a different and certainly unusual point of view. The lock symbol of the Union, on the other hand, Rome is written and Amor reads

avatarsenior
sent on January 05, 2018 (9:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Filippo Trevisan.

avatarsenior
sent on January 09, 2018 (12:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Interesting and original perspective. Too bad that the image has been scrambled in post.

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2018 (13:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like
A different and interesting perspective

avatarsenior
sent on February 26, 2021 (9:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So much talk!

avatarsupporter
sent on February 26, 2021 (9:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Italo Polce don't understand?

avatarsenior
sent on February 26, 2021 (11:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes Riccardo. They made poems on a picture, nice idea, nice picture, but then maf blurred double lock...

avatarsupporter
sent on February 26, 2021 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok thanks




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me