What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 28, 2016 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, to me it seems a common Nightingale.
What do you think? Ciao, a me sembra un Usignolo comune.
Che ne pensi? |
| sent on May 28, 2016 (15:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. The Cetti's warbler should not have a white eyebrow sharper?
Ciao. L'usignolo di fiume non dovrebbe avere un sopracciglio bianco più netto?
|
| sent on May 28, 2016 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry for the ignorance .....: - |
I correct immediately .... ;-) Scusate l ignoranza .....
Correggo subito.... |
| sent on May 28, 2016 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not count I apprentice but if he says porcupine .... cmq nice picture !! A me non mi contare sono apprendista ma se lo dice istrice.... cmq bella foto!! |
| sent on May 28, 2016 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice catch, the photograph denotes technical errors unfortunately, is definitely underexposed (you should always check the 'histogram of luminance, both during shooting, both in the post) and with an unbalanced composition of the wrong side, which suffocates the poor look nightingale.
The HD files, view the 'equipment and fittings, it is also below standard, probably due to the strong crop (36 to 10 mpx?). Bella cattura, la fotografia denota errori tecnici purtroppo, è decisamente sottoesposta ( ti consiglio di controllare sempre l' istogramma della luminanza, sia in fase di scatto, sia in post ) e con una composizione sbilanciata dal lato sbagliato, che soffoca lo sguardo del povero usignolo.
Il file HD, vista l' attrezzatura di pregio, è anch'esso sotto standard, probabilmente per il forte crop ( da 36 a 10 mpx? ). |
| sent on May 28, 2016 (16:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is in fact 'a bit underexposed, however I think that the loss of detail is due to the multiplier, as the crop is' negligible ....
Thank you Si in effetti è' un po sottoesposta, credo invece che la perdita di dettaglio sia dovuta al moltiplicatore, in quanto il crop è' trascurabile....
Grazie |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (8:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Capture by rewarding dear Fulvio, because with prey.
Then the compo and the quality will improve definitely
I miss I have ever seen let alone photograph it with this pdr, the pose and the prey!
Congratulations Fulvio and speed ahead Cattura da premiare caro Fulvio, anche perché con preda.
Poi la compo e la qualità le migliorerai sicuramente
Io manco l'ho mai visto figuriamoci fotografarlo con questo pdr, la posa e con la preda!
Complimenti Fulvio e avanti tutta |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
then I see the file is good enough and the subject very interesting and not easy to photograph species without references as it your case.
It is definitely underexposed and a shot like that really deserves to be put in place and in the future a new publication.
I suggest you also resize the web file before pubblicarlo.questo also reduces problems.
2400px long side is already a great HD, even when the photo is worth 3000 or 4000, in addition they also become heavy for viewing
greetings and congratulations a quel che vedo il file è abbastanza buono ed il soggetto molto interessante e non facilissimo da fotografare specie senza richiami come ne tuo caso.
è sicuramente sottoesposta ed uno scatto del genere meriterebbe davvero di essere messo a posto ed in futuro una nuova pubblicazione.
ti consiglio anche di ridimensionare il file per web prima di pubblicarlo.questo riduce anche i problemi.
2400px lato lungo è già un ottimo HD,quando la foto merita anche 3000 o 4000,oltre diventano anche pesanti per la visione
un saluto e complimenti |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (8:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Antonio and thanks Steff for suggestions, as you can see are not that great 'in post and as an aggravating post photos as well as the load from the computer ... :-): - |
Hello Grazie Antonio e grazie Steff per i suggerimenti, come vedi non sono un granché' in post e come aggravante posto le foto così come le carico dal computer...
Ciao |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (8:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the fact that it is underexposed, it seems not an insurmountable obstacle given the opening of the d800 shadows ;-)
excellent capture and post to review ;-) il fatto che sia sottoesposta non mi sembra un ostacolo insormontabile vista l'apertura delle ombre della d800
ottima cattura e post da rivedere |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (8:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fulvio immediately resizes the jpeg in these measures by Stefano and then work on small files.
Well I'm arranging the PP but it is important what they said Roberto and Stefano
You'll see that difference when you will reduce and then posterai the reduced picture, always after having worked in post
Good work friend and thanks the "good and friendly" you wrote about my time ago thanks.
Salutone and a good Sunday Fulvio ridimensiona subito il jpeg nelle misure dette da Stefano e poi lavora sul file ridotto.
Io pure mi sto arrangiando con la pp ma è importante quello che hanno detto Roberto e Stefano
Vedrai che differenza quando ridurrai e poi posterai la foto ridotta, sempre dopo averla lavorata in post
Buon lavoro amico e grazie del "bravo e simpatico" che hai scritto su un mio ringraziamento di tempo fa.
Un salutone e buona domenica |
| sent on May 29, 2016 (12:41) | This comment has been translated
Thank you boys! |
| sent on May 31, 2016 (0:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great on the subject even if a little underexposed Ottimo il soggetto anche se un po sottoesposto |
| sent on May 31, 2016 (6:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Fabio, Congratulations for your remarkable Gallery ... :-) Grazie Fabio, Complimenti per la tua Gallery veramente notevole... |
| sent on May 31, 2016 (23:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ITA. Compliments
Hello ;-) Ottima cattura. Complimenti
Ciao |
| sent on June 01, 2016 (7:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Joeb, picture a bit 'controversial ... :-D :-) Grazie Joeb , foto un po' dibattuta... |
| sent on December 30, 2016 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful!
Greetings
Alexander Bellissimo!
Saluti
Alessandro |
| sent on March 31, 2019 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This I had lost the subject and shoot wonderful! Quoto Steff on everything is a click that deserves to be fixed! Congratulations Hello John ;-) Questa l'avevo persa soggetto e scatto meravigliosi ! Quoto Steff su tutto è uno scatto che merita di essere sistemato ! Complimenti ciao Giovanni |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
