What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 05, 2015 (23:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An area virtually untouched. Removed the skyscrapers I think Hong Kong. Heck that density '. That said, shooting me looks very very dark and the lights in the little 'too shoot, some bright spots resemble the bot pixels. I would like the shooting data to criticize better. I find appealing the conposizione, I would say very good, it seems to me, however, 'that the set lacks sharpness. The pdr and 'nothing short of outstanding and intent as the work and' appreciable. I would have opted for a sum of exposures to safeguard the high lights and a greater brightness' of the whole.
Hello,
Walter Un'area praticamente incontaminata. Tolti i grattacieli mi pare Hong Kong. Diamine che densita'. Detto questo, lo scatto mi sembra molto molto buio e con le luci in po' troppo sparate, alcuni punti luminosi assomigliano a degli bot pixel. Vorrei i dati di scatto per criticare meglio. Trovo accattivante la conposizione, direi molto buona, mi sembra pero' che l'insieme manchi di nitidezza. Il pdr e' a dir poco eccezionale e l'intento come il lavoro e' apprezzabile. Io avrei optato per una somma di esposizioni a salvaguardia delle alte luci e di una maggiore luminosita' dell'insieme.
Ciao,
Walter |
| sent on January 05, 2015 (23:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Walter Thanks for the ride, I posted shooting data, here they are 30 sec f / 29.0, ISO 100, tripod.
Sure, double exposure and less shoot lights were on top, I agree.
Greetings Grazie Walter per il passaggio, ho postato i dati di scatto, eccoli qui 30 sec f/29.0, ISO 100, treppiede.
Certo, doppia esposizione e luci meno sparate sarebbero state il top, concordo.
Saluti |
| sent on January 06, 2015 (0:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Watched now shooting data. Seem to me that the 'f29 has ruined everything, a pose b with f11 or 16 would have safeguarded the diffraction that at this point I think, is the architect of the outcome too.
Hello,
Walter Visti ora i dati di scatto. Mi sembra proprio che l' f29 abbia rovinato il tutto, una posa b con f11 o 16 avrebbe salvaguardato la diffrazione che a questo punto credo, sia l'artefice del risultato eccessivo.
Ciao,
Walter |
| sent on January 06, 2015 (0:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I changed my mind on the lights, the end does not seem so 'high ... It seems all quite dark ... Devo ricredermi sulle luci, alla fine non mi sembrano cosi' alte... Sembra proprio il tutto piuttosto buio... |
| sent on January 06, 2015 (0:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
then the f29 was exaggerated, perhaps it was better a f16 so would be less dark and more enjoyable.
I agree.
Thank You
Greetings quindi l'f29 è stato esagerato, forse era meglio un f16 così sarebbe stata meno buia e più gradevole.
Concordo.
Grazie
Saluti |
| sent on January 06, 2015 (9:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ciao.Probabilmente you took from Mount Barro, the landscape I nuovo.Effettivamente f29 is not cheap, I in a photo taken from Barro I used a f20, but I do not think changes molto.Se like, you can catch up on some lights, but being a night I do not know if it's worth the pena.Gusti personali.Cmq, congratulations, beautiful image.
Hello, Alexander. Ciao.Probabilmente hai scattato dal monte Barro,il paesaggio non mi è nuovo.Effettivamente f29 non è poco,io in una foto fatta dal Barro ho usato un f20,ma non penso cambi molto.Se vuoi,puoi recuperare un po le luci,ma essendo un notturno non so se ne vale la pena.Gusti personali.Cmq,complimenti,bella immagine.
Ciao,Alessandro. |
| sent on January 06, 2015 (15:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Andros, was from Coltignone, a path above the Resinelli Plans.
Thanks for the advice.
Greetings
Andrea Ciao Andros, ero dal Coltignone, un sentiero sopra Piani dei Resinelli.
Grazie per i consigli.
Saluti
Andrea |
| sent on March 02, 2015 (13:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Most possible definition of this lens is f10 ... I know him well! And here was the great panoramic view of the distant. Pdr crazy though hangs to the right of the least! Another good idea ... improvable! ;-) La maggior definizione possibile di questo obiettivo è f10... lo conosco bene! E qui ci stava alla grande considerata la panoramica lontana. Pdr pazzesco anche se pende a destra di poco! Un'altra ottima idea... migliorabile! |
| sent on March 06, 2015 (22:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I did not know F10. thanks for the advice! :) non sapevo dell'f10. grazie del consiglio! :) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
