What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 17, 2017 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 'a beautiful image and deserves the like !!! However I do not like the artificial blurring the fund .... it is cloying and you notice! or indeed not what you used to know it but I think there are less invasive methods. Hello E' una bella immagine e merita il mi piace!!! tuttavia non mi piace la sfocatura artificiosa del fondo....è stucchevole e si nota! non o cosa hai usato anzi penso di saperlo ma ci sono metodi meno invasivi. ciao |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The blur is originale..l only thing I've done is to remove noise .. Lo sfocato è originale..l unica cosa che ho fatto è quella di rimozione del disturbo.. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Congrats... Greetings Francis Molto bella complimenti... Un saluto Francesco |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
no, it is not original and you see very well around the legs of the subject but not only, in nature there is a blurred so !! noise reduction better not do it with the blur tool because it makes unnatural backgrounds especially when they are so noticeable. Then de gustibus ... you like it so? ... Amen !!! no, non è originale e si vede benissimo intorno alle zampe del soggetto ma non solo, in natura non esiste uno sfocato cosi!! la riduzione del rumore meglio non farla con lo strumento sfocatura perchè rende innaturali gli sfondi soprattutto quando sono cosi percepibili. Poi de gustibus...a te piace cosi?...amen!!! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That might or might not like are gusti..ma I think I know a little better I saw the photos I made io..e know what I've done in post..per noise reduction l I made in Camera Raw and not with sfocatura..ma command if you are convinced that it is not as I say amen..la truth I know right .. Che possa o non possa piacere son gusti..ma penso di saperlo un po meglio io visto che la foto l'ho fatta io..e so cio che ho fatto in post..per la riduzione del rumore l ho fatta in camera raw e non con il comando sfocatura..ma se tu sei convinto che non è come dico io amen..la verità la so io.. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A fantastic catch, beautiful the subject very sharp and well detailed. Bravo and congratulations Una fantastica cattura, bellissimo il soggetto molto nitido e ben dettagliato. Bravo e complimenti |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:04) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but look marco I do not have mica with you! the picture is beautiful but it is post produced bad, and does not do justice to the places which are very beautiful !! remaining firm the concept that each public what it wants and how he wants, what they do not understand is how can like so, with noticeable blurring between the legs of the subject and the deeply artifact background. Then you see ... but that's not the way to do justice to an image. You do not have to take it is to let you improve something. ma guarda marco io non ce l'ho mica con te! l'immagine è bella ma è post prodotta male, e non rende giustizia ai luoghi peraltro molto belli!! restando fermo il concetto che ognuno pubblica cio che vuole e come vuole, quello che non capisco è come può piacere cosi, con la sfocatura evidente tra le zampe del soggetto e lo sfondo profondamente artefatto. Poi vedi tu...ma non è quello il modo per rendere giustizia ad una immagine. Non devi prendertela è per farti migliorare in qualcosa. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But in fact no one if the prende..anzi I am the first to say that the post I have a lot to imparare..e always say if and how do I post just for migliorare..ma do not understand how one can get stuck to say one thing when not quella..nulla remains that of course accept the suggestions to improve them .. Ma infatti nessuno se la prende..anzi io sono il primo a dire che con la post ho molto da imparare..e dico sempre se e come faccio la post appunto per migliorare..ma non capisco come uno possa impuntarsi a dire una cosa quando non è quella..nulla toglie che ovviamente i suggerimenti per migliorare li accetto.. |
user27894 | sent on January 17, 2017 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful portrait set great compliment ...... hello luca Uno stupendo ritratto ambientato benissimo complimenti...... un saluto luca |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful, for setting and detail !! congratulations, hello :-) bellissima, per ambientazione e dettaglio !! complimenti, ciao |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:33) | This comment has been translated
Thanks!!! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but as it is not that? That I say stupid things, or it is clear that if you look at the water between the legs of the subject is natural while that of the same image plane on the left and on the right is contrived? Obvious is the use of instruments not eligible! Then you see! If you want to improve informed about how not to create artifacts that. ma come non è quella?Cioè dico cavolate o è evidente che se si guarda l'acqua fra le zampe del soggetto è naturale mentre quella dello stesso piano immagine a sx e a dx è artefatta? Evidente è l'uso di strumenti non idonei! Poi vedi tu! se vuoi migliorare informati in merito a come non creare artefatti del genere. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh well ... I want to think of it as the steps you've said you insist you want them to be right I've done other procedures ... do as you wish .. vabbe pensala come vuoi...io i passaggi te li ho detti tu ti ostini a voler aver ragione che ho fatto altri procedimenti...fai come vuoi.. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:37) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (12:37) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (13:09) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous catch, congratulations! |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (13:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great nice shot and nice catch. Compliments! Greetings, Annamaria :-) Gran bello scatto e bella cattura. Complimenti! Un saluto, Annamaria |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (13:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
dances the shades of the deer, the sharpness and Out
strikes me that although the brightness of the image made in the shade, seems to have had an inner light that seems to emanate from all ............... wise post ?? balla la tonalità del cervo, la nitidezza e stacco mi colpisce molto la luminosità dell'immagine che benchè fatta in ombra, sembra avere ha una sua luminosità interna che sembra emanare dal tutto...............sapiente post?? |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (13:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in a nice environment -Hello, G in un bel ambiente -ciao, G |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |