RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Astrophotography
  4. » Constellation shield !!

 
Constellation shield !!...

nikon d7000 modificata!!

View gallery (21 photos)

Constellation shield !! sent on September 04, 2015 (21:02) by Skender Buci. 29 comments, 1478 views. [retina]

, Posa B f/4.0, ISO 1600,

10 anni fa queste foto le vedevo solo sulle riviste di astronomia, e non avrei mai pensato che un giorno le avrei fatte anch'io! !



View High Resolution 4.0 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 246000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on September 05, 2015 (0:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This star cloud called M24, is the brightest part of the entire Milky Way, inside there is the open star cluster M11 and the beautiful dark nebula LDN 326 to a host of others that characterize it. This photo is beautiful and detailed, better than the ones I photographed I Skender ... However, I'm sorry but I have to make you a little note and I hope you do not offend you, in all your calculations I see that there is always a greenish tint and sometimes tending to cyan as in this case, I think it's just your monitor, plus the open cluster M11 instead of being white is even cyan, it's a shame really because this photo is so beautiful to look 3D, so he a considerable depth of field and in this you have been very good. Since you are using Photoshop, not of would better that you you intend to use this plugin you have that is HLVG and in a moment you take away this ugly green gradient? Excuse me, but since we are friends, and I like how do the photos, I could not tell you ... but I promise that I will not tell more: -D: -D Greetings ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on September 05, 2015 (7:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Skender beautiful photos .... a warm greeting

avatarsenior
sent on September 05, 2015 (8:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I also agree with Beppe, I can put in casts and great photos. I congratulate you this is really nice.

avatarsenior
sent on September 05, 2015 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Beppe, you know me know that I'm not the type that I take it, absolutely, unfortunately I have my PC that serves me with the colors in my opinion !! The d7000 modified is a machine with an amazing sensor fantastic but at the same time he asks me to hours of processing and casts strange speccie in green !! Now I will see to look where I'm wrong maybe !! Thanks for the advice !!
Thanks to Luca and Gianluca for the kind words !!

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (0:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beppe, M24 is below, outside the field .....

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (6:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

3E

The Sagittarius Star Cloud (aka Cloud of caustics or M 24), is a vast collection of stars in the constellation of Sagittarius; also incorporates clusters IC 4715 and NGC 6603. Cit. Wikipedia
****************
Messier 24 is not a "real" object of deep sky, but a huge star cloud in the Milky Way, a pseudo-cluster of stars that extends thousands of light years along the line, and we see through a "tunnel" at that point accidentally punctures the interstellar dust. Cit. Astrolink
****************
it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nube_stellare_del_Sagittario
messier.seds.org/m/m024.html
freestarcharts.com/20-guides/messier/315-messier-24-m24-sagittarius-st
astrolink.mclink.it/messier/m/m024.html

Understand the concept? I think it is exhaustive is not it? But if you're not convinced I can continue if you want ....

user44198
avatar
sent on September 06, 2015 (11:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I would confirm what he wrote Beppe, I can not apply here below the image relative to the object, I can only repeat what it says in its description: Sagittarius Star Cloud (M24 -NGC 6603): This Cartes du Ciel: cloud of st and neb
Small Sagittarius Star Cloud
sev dark neb and NGC 6603 is all .credo ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (13:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ric, I bet you wanted to load the image of Carte du Ciel ... by the way is very accurate and customizable, you can also download the ephemeris of comets or meteors to be integrated with maps and there are periodic updates ;-)

To post a picture here is simple: go on a host server image, I use Tiny Pic it.tinypic.com/ you upload the photo to the format desisderi, when you have loaded the server gives you the link to the photo Uploader upload where you are interested in this case here in the forum board ... et voila :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (20:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Gentlemen, I disagree again:

[URL =] i60.tinypic.com/2usbvr9.jpg

How to map, at the top we see the M11 and head (or tail?) Eagle, depicted in photos and, well below, m24, out of range in the photo, with over m16-17.

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Watch that the definitions we have not invented us, in all the catalogs you'll find the same definitions, you may seem ambiguous it is not my problem, the international community astrofila for years has called so therefore disagrees with them but not with me. The answer you can find on Astrolink of which I have provided the link. For myself, I closed the speech because it is becoming redundant.


user44198
avatar
sent on September 06, 2015 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/25zleef.jpg [/ I this is the field of view of the objective in question, the 105 mm. The picture speaks for itself, and Sky Charts seems much more reliable ...

user44198
avatar
sent on September 06, 2015 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not see a bat Beppe ...

avatarjunior
sent on September 06, 2015 (23:06)

ragazzi, ragazzi... per me ha ragione Luca Sunblack, M24 è più in basso nella foto... se proprio volete togliervi ogni dubbio... tiè
[IMG]http://nova.astrometry.net/annotated_full/1237866[/IMG]

un caro saluto a tutti ;-)


P.S. Beppe mi sembri un tantino spocchioso, non avere mai troppe certezze e pensa sempre all'interlocutore... Luca fa foto e osserva il cielo da quando tu ancora non eri nato o quasi, un pò di rispetto e di umiltà credo sia d'OBBLIGO! :-P

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (23:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Luke makes photos and observes the sky from when you were not yet born or almost
I do astronomy since 1988. Me knows that Beppe, for unlike registry, I care 8-)

avatarjunior
sent on September 06, 2015 (23:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

eheheheh, but I was talking ASTROFOTOGRAFICAMENTE :-P :-P :-P

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (23:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hahaha then be little, I started two or three years ago after a photo 8-)

avatarjunior
sent on September 06, 2015 (23:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/25zleef.jpg [/ I this is the field of view of the objective in question, the 105 mm. The picture speaks for itself, and Sky Charts seems much more reliable ...


Vega, forgive me, you are right that the picture speaks for itself ... but if it was as you say and try to show the example of cartes du ciel, where you see M16 and M17 in the picture Skender?
We turn on the brain before operating the keyboard ... -D


user44198
avatar
sent on September 07, 2015 (0:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... I'm sorry that you use this terminology, I only put the field of view of a 105 mm Nikon, I think we went a little off with the opinions here .... there was talk of M24 as an object, not of subjects the photographed !!! then if Luke makes photos since 1988 does not mean anything, but I started three years ago, but I would not give advice on the brain of anyone !!! including Elio? M24 can not be seen clearly because the camera was placed horizontally, the field of view you saw is vertically and M24 is visible in the lower destra..e here close !! p
In addition I have neither offended nor even belittled the work of anybody !!!
greetings to all: fconfuso:

avatarjunior
sent on September 07, 2015 (0:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Vega I do not offend anyone and do not belittle the work of anyone, but this is nothing centers with the good stuff ... Beppe says it is M24, Luke says no, you try to confirm the idea of ??Beppe with an image of cartesduciel framing also M16 and M17 close to M24 (and write that the picture speaks for itself ...), but the image of Skender presented herein M16 and M17 is clear that there are, so just a little bit of humility and ask excuse when one makes a mistake, right?
Ask to turn the brain before pressing the buttons do not find that an offense but a satirical take on the "oversight" ... nothing more ;-)


user44198
avatar
sent on September 07, 2015 (0:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... Alexander seems to me that as an object m24 is widespread and is not just referring to the open itself ... but it goes beyond an extension, in the catalogs as cartes du ciel or other planetary m24 is depicted only as a cluster open and not as a cloud stellare..è here that one can fall into error .... then the jokes with veneers leave the time they are !! I have not totally taken as an offense, but only as a small outlet in around that personally in my years of life "astronomical" as you said about Luke, I've never spoken to anyone just because they personally know the other person and do not know how he can take it !!! I do not know if I explained well. .. ;-)
a greeting
Riccardo

ps
just to be fair I have cobegun to take pictures in 1985 .... -D: -D


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me