RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » carácter natural

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Varie

View gallery (16 photos)

carácter natural sent on February 26, 2014 (20:09) by Tex Willer. 52 comments, 3743 views.

at 20mm, 1/60 f/4.0, ISO 400, hand held.

La naturalezza della posa è la caratteristica principale che penso si debba cogliere in questa foto. Non credo che possa essere considerata "volgare", nonostante la circostanza, anche se ne ho viste di peggio in questo forum. Graditi i commenti...



4 persons like it: Quellolà, Raffaelege, Scavir, Ste2


Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user20032
avatar
sent on March 03, 2014 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Anyway glad to know that in this section, which has become a sewer, the Pap test is passed to s duodenal gastroscopy, maybe the sympathetic author of this bullshit could make a nice photo of the "after" of this young lady to most people, including myself, because of a photographic technique sloppy, vulgar and devoid of the slightest good taste, gave the same, unmistakable feeling. The result could provide a good gastroenterologist valuable information about the health of his intestine.

From a photographic point of view is how to shoot the red cross, and do not need to be Sailor (my Mom how much I miss her photos! Sad) to be able to say a bad shot (if you could not spare the window cut the bottom, at least the toilet paper behind the poor girl could take it off), a light thatsucks expression and a poor complete a picture that could not be more abominable. In fact the adjective max, and that is "barbaric," is what best describes this trash.
I try to give you some constructive advice: the fact that the cameras of today give the opportunity to take cost-free does not mean you should do to force ls, sometimes proves to be much more photographic talent in switching off the camera, turn on the brain and think about what you would do.
However I think someone should make a deep reflection on the fate of the section view of the naked folk and gynecological very little art that has taken ...


How quotarti not my friend. ;-)

This had escaped me yet section I look at it every day.
And every holy day known more and more the paucity of pictures posted, I see nudes vulgar and explicit to 110% with sex femmile as a mere character in that picture like (naked), however, should not be so ... and in case Instead it should be portrayed with all the trappings that this type of shots should have.
Nude does not mean vulgar.

Photo in question ... here we are pure crap, in every sense.
I do not see anything provocative, nothing sensual, nothing.

user28093
avatar
sent on March 03, 2014 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

That controversy:-D

avatarjunior
sent on March 04, 2014 (1:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... here we are pure crap

Thank you for the beautiful and sweet words ...!

That controversy:-D

Quoto







avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (9:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What you wonder? Those who sow the wind, or perhaps in this case it would be better to say flatulence view the pose of the "model", reap the whirlwind ... The amazing thing is that age when you do these stunts calling provocations should signing past time, type 50 years .... Boh!
However, the discussion turns on this stupid question, but you have a picture you xcome this stamperesti the poster size and then frame it and appendertela in the living room? If you gave an answer as no, as they have done more or less all those who have seen it, you can have a clear idea of ??how much bad taste and vulgarity is behind such an obscenity ....

avatarsenior
sent on March 04, 2014 (9:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Mamma mia ..............

And that will never ..........

I prefer this to the "Big Brother":-D:-D:-D

And we also add the ............ LIKE just to break:-D

Come on guys ........... there is worse in life and then .......... I see that the photo has NOT been removed ...........: -) :-) :-)

Ciaoooooooooooo

user28093
avatar
sent on March 04, 2014 (9:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If the photo was made famous by Benedusi or someone else who knows how many we would read the provocative pose the cigarette and the choice of lens:-D
@ Texwiller the next time you choose a fixed L at room temperature, so you'll see that someone finds the magic:-D

avatarjunior
sent on March 05, 2014 (16:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Scavir
I prefer this to the "Big Brother
Q8
and @ Raffaelege:
thank you for your sustaining moral ... ok.

avatarsenior
sent on March 05, 2014 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like
compliments

avatarjunior
sent on March 10, 2014 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the picture speaks for itself ... wow! how sad: fconfuso:

user12372
avatar
sent on March 10, 2014 (23:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It should be unnecessary comment. In defense of the author point out that there are images of the worst I have had many compliments and drew me against the arrows of many reputed offensivi.wow for my guest!

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (7:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

but the question is (forgive me): "How to be a picture of naked?"
It is no exaggeration perhaps in a vision of the female body, in particular, as an object? I think so, judging by the vast majority of the images that circulate. A vision of beauty that is standardized, a way of considering sex object and nothing else, although softened by poses that are allusive, yes, but never explicit. Maybe this photo is a provocation that serves to make people think.
I read it as well and thus the breaking of and invitation to reflection, I appreciated.

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (7:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello to all,

Personally, for what I've read and seen ........, things spinning, round and round.

If it is not artistic, it ranks as Erotic.
If it is Erotic, Artistic becomes.
If it is artistic, nude becomes.
If you have not become Pornographic Nude.

So ............ where you place each one the like, but personally of crap I've seen much worse.

As already said ............ better this other Blatantly Porn .......

Ciaooooooo



avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (8:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'll just say a couple of things:
1) this is a woman who is shitting, period. Please do not fall into the usual error message, interpretation, etc. Duchamp. etc.., this is simply a naked woman sitting on a toilet smoking while evaqua. I would add that any ambition and artistic interpretation, if there was the need is further blown away by sloppy handling of the composition and the non-existent care of the lights, which gives the feeling of being in front of a photo magazine for adult dating rather than a ' image designed. Just add that the aforementioned neglect by the feeling of having a prostitute in front of South America (do not get me wrong, I did not say that it is, but that is portrayed in a way that implies it) rather than the embodiment of femininity in the highest sense of the term. This da technical point of view.
2) according to me go on to say that the photo is not so trivial because there are others far worse is the same mechanism as in Italy, led all'imbarbarimento cultural, political and social. Each zozzeria is passed for acceptable with the excuse that the fund's even worse is then there is nothing wrong with that, I take a random example, in the fact that as the face of urso that crap all day transmission because of the de Filippi is much worse, and so on. The result? Herds of Obtuse illiterate and ignorant, barely aware of where they live, whose only aspiration is to make the cruise in Sharm El Sheik and who fabrizio Corona in their life example. Obviously I have an extreme concept to understand what I mean, but in reality &serious, unfortunately, is not so far from this description.
The fact that slowly those really good at this genre (sailor in the first place) is not their mailman most beautiful pictures and that the average level has dropped dramatically with very few exceptions (donated Romagnole, buffalmano Franco, Loris mirandola and a few others that I do not now come to mind) does not mean that it is justified to post everything, otherwise you would again the above error: take for example fabrizio Corona rather than Piero Angela (another random example). Photographically speaking, in a nude, I do not want to inspire a vaginal ultrasound or a smoking that shit, I much prefer to try to reach the level of a sailor or MAXU (to stay in "our" four walls), but here, as in the case of big brother or LANPhilippi rather than a good book or a good movie, to each his own. ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (8:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Cbr /> Ciaoooooooo

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (10:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Tex sorry to say, but that photo is? is not vulgar, it's bleak. I am not the type who offends, but this photo does not make sense of it from a moral and ethical point of view, nor from an artistic point of view. It is a portrait, not a report, what is it? I only see a woman who shit on the toilet, I'm at the point it was better if the traevi while he masturbated, it was less creepy and it was acceptable on youporn.

user20032
avatar
sent on March 11, 2014 (15:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As mentioned ............ better than this other Blatantly Porn .......


Not to continue ... but the category "patently porn" and the photo in question should NOT be part of the naked on Juza. So, to say that's worse than this picture does not justify the fact of seeing the zozzerie true.
I think there must be a minimum of good taste in the approach to this type of photography otherwise just sign up in the forum post where lawful for all and more and no one will break the bales.

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello to all.

So, to say that's worse than this picture does not justify the fact of seeing the zozzerie true.

You're absolutely right ..........

then we raise all the photos that are in poor taste ..........

But at this point ........... who decides what is and what is not it?

Because then it becomes complicated, because who can tolerate a toilet, maybe NOT tolerate the exposure of genitals, female or only male ones??


Hello,
Virginio
IZ2WUO

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Why ask ourselves then we are down to these levels.

Nothing could be easier scavir: ignorance is bliss, and above all, ignorance is control.
Mediocrity is a warm cradle in which the refuge to no longer run the risk of clashing with their own limits and those of their loved ones. Have not you noticed that today they are all talented, all singing, all actors, all photographers and so on? It will not be because the average level fell to a level that everyone thought very reassuring, feel justly entitled to think they can do everything even when obviously it is not so?

With regard to ignorance I think that the average level of literacy was more baxed today of course, but "culture" is not just to have a degree or know when it is made the Second World War, and, from this point of view, 50 years ago there were a bunch. The average level of education today is frighteningly low, there are people, and unfortunately, I know many who live literally lobotomized but they did not get noticed.
Where I live there are more shopping centers than schools, and I think this is not random but it does mean a lot ... Sorry end ot

user28093
avatar
sent on March 11, 2014 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How much mess for a photo on the bath:-D
Make one on a chair to see if it is the bathroom that annoys

avatarsenior
sent on March 11, 2014 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

ECi but it would be a Tiny Problem ............... my camera does NOT work The self-timer, so I would need A volunteer who provides, for this noble cause.

Uaaahahahahahahahahahahah

We want a lot of Good! ! ! !

Virginio
IZ2WUO

PS: @ Raffaelege, if you do not offer anyone, it's up to YOU ??to come to you Shoottare Ahahahahahahahahahahahahah


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me