What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 29, 2013 (20:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful image, great capture bellissima immagine,grande cattura |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry, I'm against ... a very beautiful part of the installation, I find that the detail is almost non-existent on any topic, definately the little light has influenced decisively with the iris open too and we're talking about a side photo 1200 .... imho mi dispiace, vado controcorrente...a parte la posa molto bella, io noto che il dettaglio è quasi inesistente su tutto il soggetto, sicuramene la poca luce ha influito in maniera decisiva insieme al diaframma troppo aperto e stiamo parlando di una foto a lato 1200....imho |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks again for wonderful comments.
@ Mmulinai: I thank the appreciation, not absolutely go against the tide, of course with a long side of 1200 px detail the nature of things a bit 'lost, in large format is another thing printed is even more beautiful, as I written before, the tests I've done the D4 in low light conditions, up to 4000/5000 iso produces a file still very nice, workable, and here is an example, of course if there was an opposite condition, the result would have been even better. I am preparing the last photo that will complement this gallery, with the owl on the perch, I can confirm, thanks to the "availability" by Owl during shooting, I could do some shots with high iso and photos taken at the same low iso with time up to 1/80 to 19.30, I can confirm that bothfiles despite being beautiful, what a low ISO has more sharpness, detail clean, and the quality is better. This is normal.
Back to us, I am very happy with the result, with my previous D700, in these shooting conditions, certainly I would not have achieved this.
Thank you again.
Mark Grazie ancora dei bellissimi commenti.
@Mmulinai: Ti ringrazio dell'apprezzamento, non vai assolutamente controcorrente, ovviamente con un lato lungo di 1200 px il dettaglio per forza di cose un po' si perde, in formato grande è un altra cosa, stampata è ancora più bella, come ho scritto prima, dalle prove che ho fatto la D4 in condizioni di luce scarsa, fino a 4000/5000 iso sforna un file ancora molto bello, lavorabile, e questo ne è l'esempio, ovvio se ci fosse stata una condizione opposta, il risultato sarebbe stato ancora migliore. Sto preparando l'ultima foto che andrà a completare questa galleria, con il gufo sul posatoio, ti confermo, grazie alla grande "disponibilità" da parte del gufo in fase di scatto, ho potuto fare alcuni scatti con iso alti e stessi scatti fatti ad iso bassi con tempi fino a 1/80 alle 19.30, ti confermo che per entrambe i file nonostante essere bellissimi, quello ad iso bassi ha più nitidezza, dettaglio più pulito, e la qualità è migliore. Questo è normale.
Tornando a noi, sono molto felice del risultato ottenuto, con la mia precedente D700, in queste condizioni di scatto, sicuramente non avrei ottenuto questo risultato.
Grazie Ancora.
Marco |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Porto The example described in my previous posting, posting two details the raw (unprocessed).
1. The photo of Sx has the following parameters Taken: Iso 5000 F 4 Time 1/500 Ev - 0.3
2. The photo of Dx has the following parameters Taken: Iso 2000 F 4 Time 1/100 Ev + 0.3
I hope you will be able to see the difference, in that the 5000 Iso Sx, in my opinion equally splendid, one can see that the detail of the feathers on the neck, beak, etc. is a little more mixed, less sharp than that taken in 2000 Iso.
Both taken at 19.30 Wednesday, 27.03.2013, celor covered almost in the dark.
Obvious that the more the bass are ISO file is of better quality.
I hope to be helpful.
Hello Marco Porto L'esempio descritto nel mio precedente intervento, postando i due dettagli dei Raw ( non elaborati).
URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/41/rawxn.jpg/]
1. La foto di Sx ha i seguenti Parametri di scatto: Iso 5000 F 4 Tempo 1/500 Ev - 0,3
2. La foto di Dx ha i seguenti Parametri di scatto: Iso 2000 F 4 Tempo 1/100 Ev + 0,3
spero si riesca a vedere la differenza, i 5000 Iso in quella di Sx, a mio avviso Splendida ugualmente, si può notare che il dettaglio delle piume sul collo, sul becco, ecc è un pochino più impastato, meno nitido di quella scattata a 2000 Iso.
Entrambe scattate alle 19.30 di Mercoledì 27.03.2013, celo coperto quasi al buio.
Ovvio che più gli Iso sono bassi più il file è di qualità migliore.
Spero di esservi stato utile.
Ciao Marco |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot. Bellissimo scatto. |
| sent on March 30, 2013 (0:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot
Thumb
Hello Marco Ottimo scatto
mi Piace
Ciao Marco |
| sent on March 30, 2013 (12:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much!
@ Franco Pelizza
@ Marco50
Hello Marco. Grazie mille!!!
@Franco Pelizza
@Marco50
Ciao Marco. |
| sent on March 30, 2013 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, congratulations!
Hello. Bellissimo scatto, complimenti!!!
Ciao. |
| sent on March 30, 2013 (22:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot. Congratulations ;-) Grande scatto. Complimenti  |
| sent on April 09, 2013 (18:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very good photos, spectacular for those wings.
Seem to hear the rustling of the flight!
HELLO Gran bella foto, spettacolosa per quelle ali.
Pare di sentirne il fruscio del volo!
CIAO |
| sent on June 11, 2013 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb 8-)
Congratulations 8-)
Maurizio Stupenda 
Complimenti
Maurizio |
| sent on June 12, 2013 (13:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shooting super!!
Maximum Scatto super!!!!
Massimo |
| sent on June 12, 2013 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot ;-) Ottimo scatto |
| sent on January 27, 2015 (12:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bellissimawow! Wow!
congratulations for the whole gallery Bellissima
complimenti per tutta la galleria |
| sent on January 27, 2015 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great beautiful photos. Congratulations Gran bella foto. Complimenti |
| sent on January 27, 2015 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Splendid shooting for dynamism and nn only! Splendido lo scatto per dinamicità e nn solo! |
| sent on January 27, 2015 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations! !! Complimenti! !! |
| sent on January 27, 2015 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
fabulous in everything ... congratulations .... wow! wow! favolosa in tutto...complimenti.... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
