What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 02, 2021 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The surface plane for the norm of physics and optical construction is always frontal with respect to the lens, exactly frontal.... It is not possible for physical reasons to have a blurry diagonal...
Many mobile phones, for example, that blur recreate it via sdoftware make such mistakes. In my opinion, that then it is impossible to say otherwise, this blurry defies the laws of physics {the grass further forward and the sidewalk further back}, a blurry practically diagonal as if the fire plan is along the sidewalk ... ? Il piano dello sfocato per norma della fisica e per costruzione ottica é sempre frontale rispetto l obiettivo, esattamente frontale.... Non è possibile per motivi fisici avere uno sfocato diagonale...
Molti cellulari ad esempio che lo sfocato lo ricreano via sdoftware commettono errori del genere. A mio avviso, che poi é impossibile affermare il contrario, questo sfocato sfida le leggi della fisica {l erba più in avanti e il marciapiede più in dietro}, un sfocato praticamente diagonale come se il piano del fuoco sia lungo il marciapiede... ? |
| sent on February 03, 2022 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have already taken a picture of this face.. but I don't know who it is or what it's called. I don't remember. Do you want to enlighten me please? Ho già scattato una foto a questo viso.. ma non so ne chi sia ne come si chiami. Non ricordo. Vuoi illuminarmi per cortesia? |
| sent on February 03, 2022 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I have already taken a picture of this face.. but I don't know who it is or what it's called. I don't remember. Do you want to enlighten me please? „
and who knows, I had finished the photos of the hugo boss fashion show in milan I saw me liked and I took, since the customer also wanted some street photos. " Ho già scattato una foto a questo viso.. ma non so ne chi sia ne come si chiami. Non ricordo. Vuoi illuminarmi per cortesia?"
e chi lo sà,avevo finito le foto della sfilata hugo boss a milano uscito l'ho vista mè piaciuta e ho scattato,visto che il cliente voleva anche qualche foto street. |
| sent on February 04, 2022 (7:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice person, elegant. It will gravitate around the world of fashion. Bella persona, elegante. Graviterà intorno al mondo della moda. |
| sent on February 04, 2022 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Nice person, elegant. It will gravitate around the world of fashion. „
surely yes since I always see her sitting in the front row at the Milan women's fashion shows " Bella persona, elegante. Graviterà intorno al mondo della moda."
sicuramente sì visto che la vedo sempre seduta in prima fila alle sfilate milano moda donna |
| sent on August 05, 2023 (10:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I read the notes about photo retouching: but why does someone, in 2023, have something against post production or retouching? The photo editing step is part of photography .
Machines and softwares are tools for the photographer to show what he wants to show.
If anything, we could argue that such clothing is not for a photomodel but for a "career woman". It is also true that to show it you need a model so even my comment is hot air ;-) Ho letto gli appunti in merito al foto ritocco : ma perchè qualcuno, nel 2023, ha qualcosa in contrario alla post produzione o al ritocco ? Il passaggio di fotoritocco fa parte della fotografia .
Macchine e softwares sono strumenti perchè il fotografo mostri quel che vuole mostrare.
Semmai potremmo discutere che un abbigliamento simile non è per una fotomodella ma per una "donna in carriera". E' altresì vero che per mostrarla occorre una modella quindi anche il mio commento è aria fritta  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
