RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
...

Varie

View gallery (59 photos)

sent on August 27, 2012 (9:16) by JuzaPhoto Samples. 46 comments, 13142 views.

, 1/125 f/8.0, ISO 204800, hand held.

Un altro test a 200K ISO - questa volta potete scaricare anche la versione a piena risoluzione! Ovviamente la qualità d'immagine perde moltissimo, però anche in questo caso considero la foto utilizzabile in certi ambiti (fotogiornalismo, documentario, paparazzi).



View High Resolution 16.2 MP  



PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Forgive me but now I'm serious and I want to know ... I have not edited anything to you daily what is written in my posts is that you have listed and I deleted? me understand why just do not get it ....

avatarsenior
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


Forgive but now I'm serious and I want to know ... I have not edited anything to you daily what is written in my posts is that you have listed and I deleted? me understand why just do not get it ....


I try to refresh your memory Blade71.
On page 2 of this 3D, you can read this, at least at 13.32.





As you can see in my reply to your post I quoto some of your phrases that you wrote in the message of 12:15, message consists of several lines. Message that YOU have written and magically you forgot to get deleted and replaced with the message you see above.

I'm really sorry for Juza dovergli pollute more than the 3-wayd but here goes MIA's reputation and, as I said, I do not tolerate liars and people disingenuous.

Juza, as I wrote in the other pages, please, make sure that the messages are NOT more that remains editable or track changes.
Thank you.

avatarsenior
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

between the two litigants has the third ... and then at the end of the cinghialata I'll go! Max ok? ... brings d4 and candles ... I want to see how he copes the machine with a romantic atmosphere:-D

avatarsenior
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ David Barillaro if you continue to see it as a test you can ever do because the variables are a thousand and there is always someone who will say something ..... as I told you, I could tell you that if I had a monopod with a D200 could do it even better ....... also i do not think 2k iso useful, as far as I'm concerned, when the light is below 1 2 ev for one simple reason ..... them would probably unusable, I can test the D4 but I do not even waste time, unlike in a situation with more light, where not so much a static object or person, as a dynamic situation, you can reduce the time to freeze the subject, still having acceptable behavior for different uses, for example, that picture in a newspaper was perfect .... therefore contrary to what is believed, the 2k iso should not be used in the darkcomplete, but should be used under typical conditions of a shot to 12,800 ISO, to allow you to lower the times and take the most dynamic situations stop!

avatarsenior
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to defuse David. ;-)

But I'm serious and I want to be protected from conduct such as Blade.
And according to me making posts can not be edited or cmq trace of any changes should be something that we should all ask, in our interest.

EDIT

SORRY I ask to Blade. His message is clearly visible and does NOT have deleted anything. For some reason, the exclusion of a problem with the forum, my browswer showed me something that did not correspond to reality. Perhaps a delay in updating. I do not know. But I have drawn the wrong conclusions.

avataradmin
sent on August 27, 2012 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Close the topic view that the fold soon. Tonight will test again and the D4 that the 1DX, including side by side comparison in the coming days I will publish the results.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me