RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio Naturale
  4. » Grand Seru (Valle Stretta)

 
Grand Seru (Valle Stretta)...

Landscapes3

View gallery (18 photos)

Grand Seru (Valle Stretta) sent on July 30, 2012 (23:22) by Fbog. 43 comments, 3474 views.

at 40mm, 8 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Eravamo proprio tutti in Valle Stretta : Fox, Volpy, Kyagy, Chelydra ... grazie per la piacevole compagnia ragazzi .... spero possiate apprezzare !







What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 198000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (9:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Joseph!

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (10:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The image as a whole is very nice, but the movement of water in the foreground, with the reflection of the sunset is great.
Mark

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (10:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you for Step Marco!

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Taking very very nice. A compositional han you said it all, for the rest of colors and transition from foreground to background are fantastic! Very nice water movement. Hello

Riki

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you Riki!


avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

CIA Francis!
Hmmm I seem to have an identical:-D! I will try to postarne one a little different ... The composition is good for larch trees on the right were not beautiful, I put them on the other hand to 14's in everything. In some shots there thou also one with the other:-D .... The sound is a little known, but it is manageable with any sw noise reduction.

Congratulations on a nice shot

Henry

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (14:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Enrico Thanks for the ride ... is the noise disappears down a bit 'shadows another shot posted for noise reduction try ... lately I get a lot of color noise!

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (14:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

There is nothing to do:-D you already know the solution in your unconscious 8-) 8-) a little person as serious as you can only obtain a D800, even Fox confirms you :-) :-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hehehe fantastic Eru .... ! THE D800 scary wow!

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Francesco great shot, beautiful colors and excellent composizione.Complimenti!
A saluto.Omar ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Omar gives me great pleasure to welcoming you!

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (19:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Damn, really ... now without D800 are not any more .... wow!
just expose everything to the left so that then opens.
Sorry Brother, obvious that opening up the shadows jumps out noise, not that you tried to recover a bit too much of a show not correct?
The principle of the exposure to the right is valid from a mobile to D800 including (although not cen'è need of the latter) ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on July 31, 2012 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Francesco, remember when we talked of histogram inside but with a high peak near the left margin? ... That's the case ... when you double-click to bring a little more to the right becomes much more manageable in post and save the money from the D800 ;-), in this case you can try a double opening by adjusting Lr very high color noise reduction slider and also giving a little reduction of luminance in the second export, then ps you make a mask for shadows and the funds only them, also sharp in these cases goes on level so as to reduce the opacity in the critical points.
Having said that the image is very beautiful, the water in the foreground and a wonder and landscape and light are very beautiful, as a composition prefer the latter.
Greetings :-)

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (22:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Catherine take your advice and thanks as always for the passage ....

Valter do you mean? here is a fusion manual! exposure was made on the sky and on the first floor with an exposition of the way to the shaded area .... I got a first exposure with details in highlights, trying not to have an anomalous peaks foreground properly exposed and a middle zone ... the problem with shadow detail .... I probably set too high then in post production wanting to get more brightness on the plants ... I'm talking about points on the curve is not open to retrieve detail where the shadows were now sawn ... to understand the graph never touches no SX.

Exposure to the use SX to save highlights and to understand where to drop them zone 6 or 7 or is exposed to the scene to 0 and then you get totri two frames one for the shadows exposed to DX and one for the lights underexposed SX. the problem is when the curve vaia increase contrast in a particular area ... in this case the plants which maybe is the limit but does not touch, however, in most of the detail on the borderline just some point lightened to create noise ...

As Catherine says I got you probably exposing the shadows with detail but with a peak near the edge of SX.

avatarsenior
sent on July 31, 2012 (22:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I probably set too high then in post production wanting to get a brightness greater on plants

propio is the point Fra ...
if you instead of exposing to 0 and then open in post for more brightness, do exactly the opposite, ie Solarize during shooting and post CLOSE, you will not have the problem of chromatic noise. This meant.
I, for example if I expose to 0 with my'm ruined! never mind the advanced techniques of post.

avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2012 (23:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful. Congratulations!


avatarjunior
sent on August 01, 2012 (1:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Valter, my thoughts and 'little flies that I'm discovering the limits of the sensor and I have to improve my ... I had three shots with one detail in shadows and lights one in one means or otherwise exposed to the global scene I tried to merge the best ..; obtained the file with histogram central computer have individual areas at this stage I must have too much in the open contrast on the curve. I also did not use any sw to reduce noise.
Anyway thanks for spending two minutes!

avatarjunior
sent on August 01, 2012 (1:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks ansph for the passage

avatarsenior
sent on August 01, 2012 (8:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

But imagine Fra ... :-)
I tried to understand the reason that you still have those problems with the 5D noise.
I also with double exposures (quand I had the filters was forced) I always exposed as right as possible for both exposures (both exposure to the lights to the shadows.) Never had any problems with color noise.
Instead, as you say, if it's just a matter of curve I understand, the prox careful when opening ... :-D ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on August 01, 2012 (11:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You probably have to be more careful and take me home too overexposed shots a lot for security ...
recently not to lose the general view of the scene I have just exposed too and probably this leads me to get to the surface in some situations such as this or the other Clarée ... the next time I will be smart ;-)





Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me