What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 20, 2016 (0:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile, thanks to all ...
I have a doubt ... atrocious of all the photos that I put on the forum, from your analysis, it appears that I have obvious problems maf ...
But it could be a problem of the 400D?
Possible that all stumps?
Intanto grazie a tutti...
Ho un dubbio atroce... su tutte le foto che ho messo sul forum, dalla vostra analisi, risulta che io abbia evidenti problemi di maf...
Ma potrebbe essere un problema della 400D?
Possibile che le toppi tutte?
|
| sent on July 20, 2016 (7:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I state that I did not see the other photos you're referring to.
For these photos should be put in hand the fire but not having the 400d Live View things get complicated a bit 'only having to look through the viewfinder, but nothing impossible, at best do some test shots.
If we talk about all the photos then it could be a front / Back focus problem ;-) Premetto che non ho visto le altre foto a cui ti riferisci.
Per queste foto andrebbe messo a fuoco a mano ma non avendo la 400d il Live View le cose si complicano un po' dovendo guardare solo dal mirino, ma niente di impossibile, al massimo fai qualche scatto di prova.
Se invece parliamo di tutte le foto allora potrebbe essere un problema di front/Back focus  |
user81826 | sent on July 20, 2016 (12:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yesterday there was a beautiful moon. I never made a shot like that but catches the eye out of focus at the next test definitely be able to improve! Ieri c'era una luna stupenda. Non ho mai fatto uno scatto del genere ma salta all'occhio il fuori fuoco che alla prossima prova riuscirai sicuramente a migliorare! |
| sent on July 20, 2016 (20:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
lack of sharpness, I do not know if it is due only to the diaphragm 11, too high, try f8, or even from a bad humidity condition that prevents a clear view of the satellite.
I would say that is to be rejected. manca di nitidezza,non so se dovuto solo al diaframma ad 11,troppo elevato,prova con f8,o anche da una cattiva condizione di umidità dell'aria che impedisce una visione nitida del satellite.
direi che è da riprovare. |
| sent on July 21, 2016 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sky is dark because they have given priority to the moon times it seems to me to be right
If you wanted the dark blue sky you had to do double exposure Il cielo è scuro perché hai dato priorità alla luna i tempi mi sembra siano giusti
Se volevi il cielo blu scuro dovevi fare doppia esposizione |
| sent on July 21, 2016 (23:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! The idea was to darken the sky to give prominence to the moon! Grazie! L'idea era quella di scurire il cielo per dare risalto alla luna! |
| sent on August 09, 2016 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You own the Tamron 300mm both f1 / 8 that f1 / 11 makes the maximum.
time to 480mm eq. in my opinion it should be kept as short, 1 / 250s at least.
I would say that is a good result given the equipment you own, with better lens certainly would see the difference.
the focus will not pronounce me, I can not tell by looking at this shot if you have trouble focusing.
Il Tamron che possiedi a 300mm sia a f1/8 che a f1/11 rende il massimo.
il tempo a 480mm eq. a mio parere va tenuto più breve, 1/250s come minimo.
direi che è un buon risultato vista la attrezzatura che possiedi, con una lente migliore vedresti certamente la differenza.
sulla messa a fuoco non mi pronuncio, non so dirti guardando questo scatto se hai problemi di messa a fuoco.
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
