What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 19, 2016 (20:48)
Wonderful action!!! |
| sent on February 25, 2016 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Molto bella. |
| sent on February 25, 2016 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks a lot Steve. Good things-FB- Grazie mille Steve. Buone cose-FB- |
| sent on February 25, 2016 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank Loris, good things, hello- Ti ringrazio Loris, buone cose, ciao- |
| sent on January 14, 2019 (14:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Winged chivalrous code. Codice Cavalleresco alato. |
| sent on January 14, 2019 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is so. Picture that makes you imagine in its technical parameters unpacked. Hello Claudio Si è così. Foto che fa immaginare nei suoi parametri tecnici sballati. Ciao Claudio |
| sent on January 14, 2019 (14:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For the moment and the magistral composition that has resumed, the technical parameters count little. Personally I would only take away all the "chroma noise" in the background (the blue and magenta specks) but it has little importance. Per l'attimo e la composizione magistrali che ha ripreso, i parametri tecnici contano poco. Personalmente gli toglierei solo tutto il "chroma noise" sullo sfondo (le macchioline blu e magenta) ma ha poca importanza. |
| sent on January 14, 2019 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've seen here and there in the portfolio, which I'll look better! Photographer "true", "Old solid school", more than "ancient" (the last time I put my hands on a film was the 1992, I was almost twenty years, then I stopped altogether and I have taken with digital only from 2003...). And for goodness sake, far be it from me to say that digital photographers are "fake"! The digital has many pros compared to film and also some cons. A cons and a pro together is that it is very often necessary to post-produce. But from Great satisfactions! But the friends at the bar are friends at the bar, and I understand! a greeting. C. Ho visto qua e la nel portfolio, che mi riserverò di guardare meglio! Fotografo "vero", "vecchia solida scuola", più che "antico" (l'ultima volta che ho messo le mani su una pellicola era il 1992, avevo quasi vent'anni, poi ho smesso del tutto e ho ripreso col digitale solo dal 2003...).E per carità, lungi da me dire che i fotografi digitali siano "falsi"!Il digitale ha molti pro rispetto alla pellicola e anche qualche contro. Un contro e un pro assieme è che è spessissimo necessario postprodurre. Ma da grandi soddisfazioni! Però gli amici al bar sono gli amici al bar, e capisco! Un Saluto. C. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |