What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 09, 2016 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Claudio was joking ... ;-)
"The photo is not doctored"
"I did not post anything except fix contrast and color tone" "
Scherzavo Claudio ... 
"la foto non è ritoccata"
"in post non ho fatto nulla se non correggere contrasto e tono colore""
|
| sent on February 09, 2016 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for translating .... However I have left over from an "idea I want to believe" because the reason also supported by applications that calculate the depth of field do not confirm to me what you see in the picture. : Fconfuso :: fconfuso: Grazie per aver tradotto .... Comunque mi resta più un idea da "voglio crederci" perché la ragione supportata anche da applicazioni che calcolano la profondità di campo non mi confermano quanto si vede nella foto.  |
user44432 | sent on February 09, 2016 (18:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
AND sacrosanct ... only so many compliments ED sacrosanto...solo tanti complimenti |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I knew you would become EP, congratulations, very nice ;-) The little guy is fantastic! Lo sapevo che sarebbe diventata EP, complimenti, molto bella Il piccoletto è fantastico! |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent eccellente |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fabulous !!!!! :-P Favolosa !!!!!  |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So cool !! Fighissima !! |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great!
Congratulations on the EP deserved.
Bravo
Angel Grande!
Complimenti per l'EP meritatissimo.
Bravo
Angelo |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice! nice! |
| sent on February 09, 2016 (23:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful little dog, you managed to shoot a really beautiful and very fun time :-D congratulations, great nice shot!
Andrew Bellissimo cagnolino, sei riuscito a riprendere un momento davvero stupendo e molto divertente  complimenti, gran bello scatto!
Andrea |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (0:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Show this dog Spettacolo sto cane |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ The more I look the more I seem an artificial blurred ... done at the table „
This site is full of EP with artificial blurred facts also much more showy table but the fact remains that this is a great photo, congratulations! :-) " Più la guardo e più mi sembra uno sfocato artificiale ... fatto a tavolino"
questo sito è pieno di EP con sfocati artificiali fatti a tavolino anche molto più vistosi ma ciò non toglie che questa sia una grande foto, complimenti!  |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (16:15)
photo is not artificially blurred ! |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (17:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fichissima fichissima |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Speechless ... congratulations. Senza parole...complimenti. |
| sent on February 10, 2016 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good and nice ottima e simpatica |
| sent on February 12, 2016 (1:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And so it was that all of my years in aerospace engineering had no more sense ................. FABULOUS! E fu così che tutti i miei anni in ingegneria aerospaziale non ebbero più senso................. FAVOLOSA! |
| sent on February 12, 2016 (2:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ However conceivable to 150-200mm focal length, f 2.8 and about twenty meters away I do not think you can have that depth of field ... „
“ If a 2.8 maybe there would have been the only nose. But I could be wrong because some leaves are on fire ... but it could have been expertly unmasked for cosmetic reasons ... so ... two of us to be curious „
Julian V. and Francis Tarin, I did the necessary calculations to solve the dilemma:
a Beagle adult is long (excluding the tail, but here you can not see) between 45 and 60 cm ... At a distance of 14 meters the pdc of a 200mm f / 2.8 mounted on a 70D is already 49.3 cm, more than enough to see the beagle with blurred light on the legs and on the noseas in this photo, 20 meters then the pdc rooms even 1.01 meters .........
I invite you to look at photos of the same author with the sled dogs: f / 3.2 is already possible that even the husky are fully focused for 18 meters ;-)
Regarding the pdc of the land is an observation more appropriate, because at first glance might be deceiving, however, is that too simple dilemma: the pov is really very low and there are some leaves out of focus in the foreground that occlude the grounding portion actually on fire; the current position can not know if there was another "land" focus behind these leaves ... then observe that behind the portion which is seen to fire the earth evidently changing slope, hence theapart from focusing occludes to another portion potentially put on fire! 8-)
last but not least, the compression to 200mm (X1.6) ago is that the strip which could also be of 30 cm, to appear, from this pov of well over a few cm!
I hope to have been exhaustive! This is a great photographer, the doubts are legitimate, and must be solved to give credit where there are;) " Comunque con lunghezza focale ipotizzabile a 150-200mm, f 2.8 e ad una ventina di metri di distanza non credo si possa avere quella profondità di campo ... "
" Altrimenti a 2.8 forse ci sarebbe stato il solo naso. Però potrei anche sbagliarmi perché alcune foglie sono a fuoco ...ma anche li potrebbero essere state sapientemente smascherate per motivi di estetica ...per cui ... Siamo in due ad essere curiosi"
Giuliano V. e Francesco Tarin, ho fatto i dovuti calcoli per risolvere il dilemma:
un Beagle adulto è lungo (coda esclusa, ma qui non si vede) tra i 45 e i 60 cm... Alla distanza di 14 metri la pdc di un 200mm a f/2.8 montato su una 70D è già di 49,3 cm, più che sufficiente per vedere il beagle con i leggeri sfuocati sulle zampe e sul naso come in questa foto, a 20 metri allora la pdc sale addirittura a 1,01 metri.........
Vi invito a guardare le foto dello stesso autore con i cani da slitta: a f/3.2 è già possibile che persino gli husky siano completamente a fuoco già da 18 metri
Riguardo alla pdc del terreno è un'osservazione più calzante, visto che a primo sguardo potrebbe trarre in inganno, però è di semplice soluzione pure questo dilemma: il pov è davvero molto basso e ci sono delle foglie fuori fuoco in primo piano che occludono la porzione di terra messa effettivamente a fuoco; dalla posizione attuale non possiamo sapere se c'era ulteriore "terra" messa a fuoco dietro queste foglie... osservare poi che dietro la porzione che si vede a fuoco la terra evidentemente cambia pendenza, quindi anche la parte messa a fuoco occlude verso un'altra porzione messa potenzialmente a fuoco! 
ultima ma non ultima, la compressione a 200mm (x1.6) fa si che quella striscia che potrebbe essere anche di 30 cm, appaia, da questo pov di ben più pochi cm!
Spero di esser stato esaustivo! Questo è un grande fotografo, i dubbi sono leciti, e vanno risolti per riconoscere i meriti dove ci sono ;) |
| sent on February 12, 2016 (2:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Thanks for translating .... However I have left over from an "idea I want to believe" because the reason also supported by applications that calculate the depth of field do not confirm to me what you see in the picture. „
What program did you use Francis ??? wow! " Grazie per aver tradotto .... Comunque mi resta più un idea da "voglio crederci" perché la ragione supportata anche da applicazioni che calcolano la profondità di campo non mi confermano quanto si vede nella foto."
Che programma hai usato Francesco???  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
