What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 04, 2016 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
..ti explained very well Fasoad, the Orion Nebula to resume with aps-c with just the nebula you need at least one focal 600-800, 200 is just the image that you did .... but it is important who uses only one focal, 200, a tracker, with poses at least 2-3 minutes to 1600 iSO. You should also begin to resume wider fields, to 50mm, always put at least 60 seconds. In straight lines with a very important part of the objectives is the sky, it must be the least polluted possible. Remember then that the processing phase is as important as shooting. What do you use as sw? ..ti ha spiegato molto bene Fasoad, la nebulosa di Orione per riprenderla con aps-c con solo la nebulosa ti serve almeno un 600-800 di focale, a 200 è giusta l'immagine che hai fatto....ma è importante che usi , a quella focale, 200, un inseguitore, con pose di almeno 2-3 minuti a 1600 iso. Ti consiglio anche di iniziare a riprendere campi più larghi, a 50mm, sempre con pose di almeno 60 secondi. In reltà con obbiettivi una parte importantissima la fa il cielo, deve essere il meno inquinato possibile. Ricorda poi che la fase di elaborazione è tanto importante quanto la ripresa. Cosa usi come sw? |
| sent on December 04, 2016 (21:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hear how post production program? Use Photoshop CS6 ... intendi come programma di post produzione? Uso Photoshop CS6... |
| sent on December 05, 2016 (14:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in ok, but as a supplement, DSS, or Pix Iris a ok, ma come integrazione, DSS,Pix o Iris |
| sent on December 05, 2016 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
mmmhh I do not have any program ... mmmhh non ho ancora nessun programma... |
| sent on December 26, 2017 (10:14) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on December 26, 2017 (11:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello Roby and thank you, congratulations for your beautiful wide-field astro images !! ciao Roby e grazie, complimenti per le tue bellissime immagini astro a largo campo!! |
| sent on January 04, 2020 (13:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and rich in bares detail, perhaps slightly penalized in Ha but on the whole a truly excellent image; I'm going to make you the champorcher sky, especially for the sight that had to be spectacular. Congratulations also to the rest of your gallery, really high level! ;-) Bellissima e ricca di dettaglio Bares, forse leggermente penalizzata in Ha ma nell'insieme un'immagine veramente eccellente; ti invidio il cielo di Champorcher, particolarmente per il seeing che doveva essere spettacolare. Complimenti anche per il resto della tua gallery, veramente di alto livello!  |
| sent on January 04, 2020 (17:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you Renzo, this is an "old" shot with the mythical fsq ;-) grazie Renzo, questa è una "vecchia" ripresa con il mitico fsq |
| sent on January 06, 2020 (18:08) | This comment has been translated
 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
