RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » Spring (Papilio machaon)

 
Spring (Papilio machaon)...

Macro

View gallery (21 photos)

Spring (Papilio machaon) sent on April 23, 2012 (21:24) by Forrest. 23 comments, 4394 views.

, 1/800 f/3.2, ISO 200, tripod. Specie: Papilio machaon

Ciao a tutti!Più o meno credo che il macaone sia il martino dei macrofotografi,tutti(o quasi) vorrebbero fotografarlo e la maggior parte ci riesce,ecco dopo qualche anno anche io sono riuscito a trovare e fotografare questa splendida farfalla,ne ho viste diverse in volo ma mai una così da vicino,che dire un soggetto davvero splendido :) Comunque mancanza di originalità a parte lo scatto è composto da 8 scatti in focus stacking,ho anche dato leggermente più aria a destra perchè in fase di scatto avevo messo il bordo dell'ala troppo vicino al bordo. Qui potete vedere uno dei raw usati http://i39.tinypic.com/fwubg0.jpg Scattata il 23/04/2012 alle 8.38





PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on April 24, 2012 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I will have half a duffer with macros .... :-(
but how do you go 8 and 8 pictures say a butterfly without this move a single mm
I have to find someone to tell me how it's done

avatarjunior
sent on April 24, 2012 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wow thank you very much to all for your comments and thanks to those who visited! :)
In particular, thanks to: Ale73; Enigma; Michela; Silo78; Boyetto; Maxspin73; Franco Giannattasio; Zeffyro; Kimera69, Free Spirit, Francesco Cassulo; Vitolongo; Marcofarina; Giopan; Gare75; Mastro78; Marcofarina, David Morellini; N_i_c_o; Davide__m, Roberto Ragusa!
And now we come to the answers
I do not like this type of technique, I'd rather bring home some wrong photo and evaluate an error rather than creating it on the computer to make it perfect, plus you also added a bit of background.
It is a challenge and my far from her like this, I appreciate the fact that you were sincere in declaring it and it makes you honor

You're absolutely right also errors of composition are what I consider the worst, in fact they are not very happy to be speaking that way, even for a few pixel.Purtroppo I realized the only thing at home, the next time to be more cerherò & ugrave; careful :) I then spoke that way because I do not know how many times I have yet to meet a swallowtail in perfect condition, but I hope a lot:-D. The fact of the state action undertaken think it should be common practice just because we are on a forum and then here to confront and discuss, to write as little as possible, there are "windows" such as flickr, deviantart and stuff genere.Questo is my thought :)

But I know a coloring unnatural, and in the background on the subject. The shot is beautiful again, but I feel this

And you're absolutely right, I double checked the shot and reworked the butterfly with 16 shots instead of 8 and over improve the sharpness is very high now that I proceeded to adjust the colors on the subject and to fix a few minor imperfections created by ' union of the shots, the background I left the same because I do not mind, also given the colors of the young shoots non was too far away from what is here :) anyway here is the updated version

hope I have not introduced new errors:-D

But you'll soon see how many there are, and want to own them all :-)

In fact, just the list of butterflies that I would at least see continues to grow 8-)

quoto for the photo of the week

I'm glad you like it so much! However, I saw a really great shots and wonderful people that I have to learn a lot in my opinion are out of the game:-D. Not that I mind, to see so many shots of excellent workmanship can not make me happy :)

and my small staff osserevazione and that I hope will always suggest constructive interest is the part of the sky on top of the middle frame and left a little infstidisce, stuff but if it was anything more uniforme'' better'' I think

You've done well to insert your observation, the inclusion of the sky I like it because it adds color to the background, however, are always in doubt when I do it because maybe this research can be precisely unbalanced :)

I have found that these fiorelli are very generous with regard to butterflies

Good to know, I had found on a flower like this (grass viper?) But I did not think it was so appreciated:-D. Ah, here's something I did not write, the subject was positioned because when he was still with closed wings I moved to take a photo of an orchid and then put it back on the grass viper but always on a map and not near the same.

but how do you go 8 and 8 pictures say a butterfly without this move a single mm


This is a good question (because the photos usedin restating the end they were 16, but I've done a lot more), I state by saying that the butterfly was still in full activity, but had just spread my wings to warm up and then was still rather immobile, but not completely In fact, given a light breeze and small movements of the throttle when merging photoshop created small areas badly overlapped with little sharpness which I then proceeded to correct overlapping back some shots and manually combining the areas concerned, in fact recommend that you check for fit all the picture when you start this kind of action, even the background because sometimes problems lì.Oltre also add to that that the shots were done in "fast" sequence, the 16 shots used in fact have been made over 35sec.Purtroppo this technique has limitations and extends the PP, also after alignment must crop the image as the overlap is not perfect, but when you can not find ideal conditions can play better con the background and to make better use of the risolvenza lente.Comunque also ask if you have any questions, try to answer in my limits, hoping that others can add more 8-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 10, 2012 (21:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A true wonder!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me