From Reflex to Mirrorless (with the Sony A5100)
- More »
- Articles » From Reflex to Mirrorless (with the Sony A5100)
From Reflex to Mirrorless (with the Sony A5100), text and photos by Juza
. Published on September 22, 2014; 11 replies, 26854 views.
After using Canon cameras for almost ten years, I have decided to switch to Sony, and in particular to the Sony A5100. Why? At Photokina 2014, I really expected to see some serious mirrorless camera from Canon or Nikon; instead, once again the two 'giants' ignored the mirrorless world, a young but quickly emerging market.
Until few years ago, ML cameras were a niche market; nowadays, they have reached or surpassed the image quality of the best DSLR cameras, and they have finally reached the same AF speed. Many photographers that until few years ago would have never thought of leaving Canon and Nikon, me included, now are seriously considering the alternatives from other brands: mirrorless keep getting better and better, and thanks to the many lens adapter it is easy to switch without having to replace all your lens lineup.
Personally, I'll stay on the fence for some time: now I use Sony cameras with Canon lenses; if in future Canon will announce a truly outstanding ML camera (not an easy task, considering the excellent level reached by Sony) I'll go back to Canon, while if Sony announces the lenses that I need, with first rate optical quality, I'll complete the switch to Sony.
In this article, I have compared reflex and mirrorless cameras (and in particular with my new Sony A5100): let's see why ML are so interesting and what are their pros and cons!
AutofocusThe first mirrorless cameras had a very poor autofocus because they used exclusively contrast-detection autofocus; AF was barely acceptable for stationary subjects and it was completely unusable for tracking moving subjects. For many years, AF has been the Achille's heel of ML cameras.
Nowadays, several ML cameras have replaced few hundred pixels of the main image sensor with tiny phase detection AF sensors; the result is a much improved AF, more than enough for still subject and, in few cameras (Sony A6000 and Sony A5100, for example), good enough even for fast moving subjects. These mirrorless hav2 finally surpassed the AF capabilities of DSLRs in its price range, and in a couple of years all MLs will likely have and AF comparable or better than DSLRs.
Size and weightThanks to the simpler design, mirrorless cameras can be much smaller and lighter than DSLRs. Of course, it is also possible to make ML cameras as big as DSLRs: nowadays most ML focus on small size because they are aimed mainly to amateurs and travel photographers, but when the transition from reflex to mirrorless will be complete, we will see also ML cameras with the size and the ergonomics of pro DSLRs as the Nikon D800 or Canon 5D3. The recently announced Samsung NX1 already comes close, it has the same size of the Canon 70D and very similar ergonomics.
In the case of my Sony A5100, the weight is just 283 grams (battery included), instead of the 800 grams of my previous Canon 70D, a very welcome weight reduction that makes even easier traveling and backpacking.
Size is another advantage of ML cameras: the Sony A5100 measures just 110 x 63 x 36 mm, while the smallest reflex currently in production, the Canon 100D, measures 116 x 90 x 64 mm (the Canon 70D is 139 x 104 x 79 mm).
With good lenses, the 24 megapixels sensor of the A5100 gives excellent results, on par with the best APS-C cameras on the market today. Sony A5100, Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM, 0.6 sec f/9.0, ISO 100, tripod.
Faster continuous speedThe maximum FPS rate or SLRs is limited by the mechanical shutter and the mirror; MLs instead are limited only by the readout speed of the sensor and the buffer. The mirrorless that still use mechanical shutter have a continuous speed comparable to professional DSLRs (11-12 FPS), and some MLs with electronic shutter reach even 60 FPS at full resolution.
The Sony A5100 has about the same speed of the Canon 70D (6 FPS vs 7 FPS), in spite of much lower price; the Sony A6000, that can be considered a direct competitor to the 70D, has an impressive 11 FPS continuous shooting. Of course, fast shooting is useless without an equally fast autofocus tracking: the latest mirrorless from Sony, the A5100 and A6000, have finally reached the AF speed of SLR cameras in their price class.
Viewfinder (or lack of)
The Sony A5100 does not have a viewfinder; this allows to reduce size, weight and costs. In the past the viewfinder was an essential element of the camera, but with Live View I have abandoned it in favor of the large LCD screen. In landscape and macro photography, using the Live View instead of the viewfinder allows to frame easily the scene even when shooting from awkward angles; it helps to do a very precise manual focus and it gives a preview of the exposure in real time.
In other fields of photography, for example wildlife, the viewfinder is still the preferred choice: in this case, I'd recommend to get the slightly more expensive Sony A6000 instead, that has built-in electronic viewfinder. The electronic viewfinder has the advantage of being not depended by sensor size; while APS-C DSLRs have smaller viewfinders than FF DSLRs, mirrorless cameras can use large viewfinders even if they have APS-C or 4/3 sensors.
A photo taken with the Sony A6000, 'sister' of the A5100 in terms of sensor and AF). Sony A6000, Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS, 1/30 f/9.0, ISO 100, tripod. Lagazuoi, Italy.
Mirror and shutterAs it is obvious from their name, mirrorless cameras does not have the mirror. Removing this component makes the camera easier to build (thus cheaper), more resistant (one less moving part), smaller and lighter. Other than that, it eliminates definitively the problem of camera vibrations due to mirror movements, so the mirror lock-up function is no longer needed.
The mechanical shutter is still present in most mirrorless cameras, but luckily most of them, included the Sony A5100, have the electronic first curtain, that eliminates shutter vibrations and reduces shutter noise. Some ML cameras, as the Sony A7s or the Panasonic GH4, have even the option to use a fully electronic shutter; in future (few years from now), the electronic shutter will completely replace the mechanical shutter.
Tiltable LCD screen and touchIn this aspect there is no difference between ML and DSLRs; the tiltable screen can be found on both kind of cameras. After using with great satisfaction the LCD screen of the Canon 70D, I'd never come back to a camera that lacks of this feature: it makes really, really more comfortable to compose the photo. Almost all Sony mirrorless cameras have tiltable screen, but the one that can be found in the A5100 has the can be moved up to 180 degrees, while the other Sony cameras stop at 90 degrees.
Like my previous 70D, the Sony A5100 has touchscreen: this feature is not as essential as the tiltable screen, but it makes a little easier to use some features of the camera (fo example, to magnify a portion of the image). I don't like too much the 16:9 ratio of the screen, for photographers the 3:2 screens are better, but it was necessary due to the size of the A5100, the 16:9 ratio was the only way to fit a large screen on such small camera body.
USB charging and micro-USBThe Sony A5100, like the 90% of cameras on the market, has a micro-USB port, that allows to easily download the photos to my computer using the same micro-USB cable that I use for the mobile phone and for everything else. Canon is one of the few brands that still use the obsolete mini-USB port, that has been replaced by micro-USB years ago, so when I downloaded the photos from the 70D I needed a dedicated cable.
Other than that, all Sony ML cameras can be recharged with a USB cable, reducing the necessity for a separate battery charger. I use a USB cable that I connect directly to the Skross MUV electric socket when I am travelling, or to the computer when I am at home (this is the same setup that I use to charge the mobile phone and the torch).
The possibility of direct USB recharging also allows to use external USB batteries, as the RavPower, to recharge the camera. My only complaint is that you can not recharge the camera while it is in use, as you can do with Samsung NX cameras.
Thanks to the 180 degrees tiltable screen, taking macro photos with the A5100 is a real pleasure. Sony A5100, Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM, 1.3 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod.
Few more things about the A5100
Being used to the Canon system, where entry-level cameras have reduced features and few customization options, I have been amazed by how much you can customize the A5100: you can choose the function to assign to most buttons (for example, I use the Help button for depth of field preview), and the menus have countless options to customize and fine tune every aspect of the camera.
The camera body is incredibly small, even smaller than what it may look for the photos - for me, it is a good thing, since I want to reduce as much as possible to bulk of my backpack and I don't care about ergonomics, since I almost always use the camera on tripod. It is amazing to think how much technology there is in such small camera!
The image quality is in line with the best APS-C cameras currently on the market, since it uses the same 24 megapixels sensor of the Sony A6000 and Nikon D7100: like most APS-C, it is fully usable up to 1600 ISO, or even 3200 ISO with good post processing and noise reduction; if you need ISO 6400, 12800 and above, currently there is no APS-C camera that can give good image quality at these sensitivities, so I'd recommend to go for a fullframe camera, as the excellent Sony A7s, Canon 6D or Nikon D610.
Since this is a very new camera, it is not fully supported yet by most adapters: for example, with the Metabones Smart Adapter IV I have no issues with the 8-16 and 24-105, while with the 180 macro the aperture often gets stuck. The Sony A5100 will be added between the supported cameras in the next firmware update by Metabones, I'll do the upgrade as soon as it becomes available (the adapter has a micro-USB port that allows to easily upgrade the firmware).
The price is another point in favor of the little Sony: at 500 € (or 550 US Dollars on B&H
, if you live in the United States) it is a bargain, there are few cameras that have this quality and features at such price point.
Alternatives: A6000, A7s, EOS M
Why I have chosen the A5100 instead of the A6000? price is not an issue, since the difference is about 50 €; my reasons to prefer the A5100 are the wider tilt angle of the screen (180 degrees vs 90), the LCD with touchscreen, the lack of viewfinder (that I never use), the more user-friendly controls (the A5100 is cleaner and more essential). Other that that, the LCD screen of the A5100 can be moved without any problem even when the camera is mounted on a tripod, while the A6000 screen gets stuck in the tripod camera plate due to a design flaw.
I have excluded the lower-end A5000, instead, because it uses an old sensor that is much noisier than the 24 megapixels sensor of the A5100 and A6000.
I am very fascinated by the Sony A7s and its super clean, 12 megapixels fullframe sensor, but I have asked myself: how many times I use high ISO for macro and landscapes? The majority of my photos are taken at low ISO, and here fullframe does not offer big advantages in comparison to APS-C. For the rare situations when I'll need great high ISO (for example, northern lights trips), I'll borrow a FF camera.
The EOS M is a nice camera for its current price, but it has very poor AF, it is much slower than the A5100, it lacks micro-USB and USB recharging and it has no tiltable screen. Honestly, I'd have preferred to stay with Canon since I know well but brand, but for years its only mirrorless offer has been much worse than competition, and it still doesn't have any alternative to Sony ML cameras.
I have not considered the 4/3" sistems because I don't like the 4:3 image ratio, so I'd end up cropping all the photos to 3:2; moreover, I want a system that offers both ASP-C and fullframe cameras, so I have an option when I need great high ISO.
FujiFilm and Samsung have some interesting cameras and good lenses, but their systems are still too limited for what I need; I think that currently Sony is the leader in the mirrorless market.
One of the things that have made me choose Sony is that it offers both APS-C and FF mirroless cameras: in the situations where I need great image quality in low light, the A7 series cameras are a great choice. Sony A7, Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T*, 30 sec f/8.0, ISO 100, tripod. Bobbio, Italy.
Lenses: Canon and Metabones
While I really like Sony cameras, I have not found yet Sony lenses that satisfy me completely: those that I have tried (24-70 FE and 16-70 E) are sharp in the center but they are soft in the corners (the 16-70 is a big better than its fullframe counterpart, but still not as good as I'd expect from a $1000 lens). It is a pity because they are otherwise very good lenses: built quality is on par with Canon and Nikon; AF is fast and silent and most of them have image stabilization.
I am very satisfied, instead, from the lenses that I currently use: my Sigma 8-16mm wide-angle, the Canon 24-105 standard zoom and the Canon 180mm macro lens. For this reason, I have decided to keep using them even on the A5100, using the Metabones Smart Adapter IV EF-NEX
, that maintains all features of the lens.
Of course, dedicated mirrorless lens would be much smaller and lighter, and they would allow to take advantage of the fast autofocus of the A5100: for now I'm going to 'stay on the window' and watch what come out from Sony, Sigma and Tamron, until one of these brands will announce a lens that satisfies me as much as my current lenses.
Conclusion: who is for?
Mirrorless are not (yet) the best choice for everyone: if you do mainly wildlife, sport, action photography, I'd recommend to stay with DSLRs for now, since no ML system offers native lenses for such fields, and the adapters makes AF too slow. That said, ML systems are quickly growing, and FujiFilm and Samsung have already announced the development of professional telephotos (the 140-400mm and the 300mm f/2.8) that will be ready for next year, Sony will likely follow with similar lenses.
For landscape, macro, travel and portrait/studio photographers, instead, ML cameras are now a serious alternative to reflex: if you are fascinated by this new 'world' are there are mirrorless cameras suitable for your exigencies, I recommend to give it a try!
Replies and comments
What do you think about this article?Do you want to tell your opinion, ask questions to the author, or simply congratulate on a particularly interesting article? You can join the discussion by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 195000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.