JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Plane compression sent on January 08, 2023 (23:52) by Old_pentax. 2 comments, 215 views.
Piccolo documentario in cui si vede la compressione dei piani in tempo reale passando da una focale di 50 mm ad una focale di 200 mm. Il tutto ricostruito attraverso immagini e filmati 3D.
Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.
user236140
sent on January 09, 2023 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice but... cactus! It ended suddenly leaving me with drool in my mouth in my opinion? it would take a final that gives some more info on the practical usefulness of this effect, which I guess a little, but not too much for example. To photograph a landscape, is it worth a short or a long one? If you want to emphasize the vastness of a place it seems to me that you should use a short OB but then landscape designers with long OB can never emphasize this aspect? Molto bella ma... cactus! È finito di colpo lasciandomi con la bava alla bocca ?
Secondo me ci vorrebbe un finale che dia qualche info in più sull'utilità pratica di questo effetto, che un poco intuisco, ma non troppo
per es. per fotografare un paesaggio conviene un corto o un lungo?
Se si vuole enfatizzare la vastità di un luogo mi sembra che si debba usare un OB corto ma quindi i paesaggisti con OB lungo non potranno mai enfatizzare tale aspetto?