Nuovo Olympus 150-400 vs 100-400 Panleica vs 100-400 Canon vs 100-400 Sony

“ Vedendo le foto non mi sembra superiore al 100-400 Panaleica che, almeno fino a 350mm, ricordo era decisamente nitido. „

“ Neanche l'avessimo chiamata .. ecco la prima MrGreen

mirrorlesscomparison.com/micro-four-thirds-lenses/olympus-100-400mm-vs „

“ Olympus has a similar system called Sync IS, but surprisingly the 100-400mm is not compatible, unlike the 300mm Pro.

The IBIS on the body and the IS on the lens remain independent and you can use one or the other. You can also keep both active, but since Sync IS doesn't work, I'm not entirely sure which gets priority. I suspect the camera goes from one to the other depending on the focal length used or the amount of shake correction needed. „

“ mirrorlesscomparison.com/micro-four-thirds-lenses/olympus-100-400mm-vs „

“ da verificare la compatibilità del dual IS „

“ Neanche l'avessimo chiamata .. ecco la prima MrGreen

mirrorlesscomparison.com/micro-four-thirds-lenses/olympus-100-400mm-vs „

“ Quali sarebbero le ottiche non pro stabilizzate sull'ottica? Non ne ricordo...

E' strana questa cosa, secondo me sarà dual IS „

“ As you'll notice in the model name, the new 100-400mm is one of the few Olympus lenses to include optical image stabilization. However, unlike the 300mm f/4 IS Pro and 12-100mm f/4 IS Pro, the 100-400mm lens is not compatible with Olympus' 5-axis Sync IS technology. The lens IS and in-body IS of Olympus camera bodies are independent; IS systems on the lens or body can be enabled or disabled separately. However, when both are enabled, they do work together, with the lens providing standard pitch and yaw stabilization while the IBIS performs roll stabilization. According to Olympus, the 100-400mm's IS system on its own is CIPA-rated for 3-stops of IS correction „

“ Confermato che non è compatibile con il dual is... assurdo
„