JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The TTartisan APS-C 10mm f/2 is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2023. The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 199 €;
5 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon RF.
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Nikon Z.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Price, yield even at the edges by closing the diaphragm
Cons:Weight
Opinion:An exciting lens in some respects and a little disappointing in others. Built entirely of metal, including the lens hood, it undoubtedly gives an impression of solidity. The dimensions are quite small. And here comes (for me) a con. Being all metal, it takes on an important weight. Even the objective cap is made of metal... Looking at the dimensions, one would not say that it weighs like a tile. The maf ring nut is well made and sized. There is also the aperture ring, and here the second con: thin and close to the camera body. Not the best to operate. For God's sake, to use it you use it, but it could be better. It is incredible how low the distortion is in such a broad perspective. The TA yield in the center is excellent but at the edges it drops drastically. By nose, to have an optimal performance everywhere, you must avoid opening below 5.6. And then I don't understand what is the use of such an optic with f2.0 aperture... I would tend to use it for landscapes, so much more closed. The vignetting is there but it is expected in such a perspective and indeed it is even lower than expected. It's manual focus, but it's not a dramatic lack. With a super wide-angle lens you travel hyperfocal and go. Otherwise the PDC is there and it is remarkable already by closing a hair. In short, in conclusion, for the cost it is worth it. What holds me back from total enthusiasm is the weight. Solid is solid, it's all metal. But why? Metal is solid but on the other hand it weighs. If there were no alternatives, Formula One cars would be made of metal, right? Instead, to reduce weight, they avoid metal. There are very light materials and even more resistant than metal. Such a lens, for example, if you fall to the ground on the hard, you pick it up dented and with the compromised mechanisms and throw it away. Mark
Pros:Construction and maneuverability. Good optical performance.
Cons:Taking into account the cost and that it is completely manual, I have not found any.
Opinion:Manual focus lens, all metal, with well-marked aperture ring (even half aperture). Small size for an f2. Nice screw-on lens cap combined with the lens hood. This lens surprised me positively considering the cost. It is sharp, does not vignette and does not suffer from flare. The colors are bright, Pentax style. I use it on Full Frame with crop in the camera and it gives me very good files. Very balanced as dimensions on A7ii.
Pros:Wide coverage with its 109°, good definition and contrast, compact optics and well equipped with caps and accessories
Cons:a bit heavy for the size it has
Opinion:The definition is also very good in relation to the cost, negligible for such a strong optic. Just purchased and tested in extreme conditions it proved to be a good lens. I found it incredible that it has a barely perceptible distortion, I own other emblazoned lenses with less exasperated focal lengths that have a very evident distortion. Achilles' heel, but it was to be expected, are the internal reflections: as soon as a little side light enters, the flare is wasted... but it can be exploited for creative purposes.
Pros:Very good overall contrast, very good sharpness in the center and very good at the edges from f4 to f9.5. Excellent value for money, sturdy construction, beautiful dials, excellent equipment: lens hood, filter holder.
Cons:modest sharpness at the edges at f2 and f2.8, slightly high weight, lack of contacts and therefore of communication with the camera.
Opinion:Photographer for pleasure for many years, I used the Flektogon 20mm f2.8 of Zeiss Jena ex DDR on Pentax and the 21mm Zuiko f3.5 on OM-1n both film and I must say that, this TTartisan, does not look bad with either lens, just aperture at least at f4. The lack of autofocus is not noticeable, given the great depth of focus. Rather I would have liked the communication with the camera. I use it on G9 and OM E-10 IV micro 4/3, so the equivalent focal length is precisely 20mm. I would also have liked it to be a little lighter but in conclusion, given the ridiculous price it is absolutely advisable. I uploaded on my Miscellanea gallery, a comparison (which does not want to have a scientific character) between 2 wide-angle lenses: the Zuiko 21mm f3.5 and the Ttartisan 10mm f2. The zuiko was mounted on Sony A7 while the 10mm Ttartisan on Panasonic G9. This is to have more or less the same angle of view. I leave the conclusions to the reader but I would like to remind you that the Zuiko 21mm f3.5 cost in 1975 a good £200,000 (source "Almanacco Fotografare estate 1975") which is equivalent to today's €1,263 (source "rivaluta.istat.it")
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
