JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Sony HX350 is a compact camera with 1/2.3" (5.6x) sensor and 20.4 megapixels manufactured from 2016. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 80 - 3200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 10 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 350 €;
3 users have given it an average vote of 8.0 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 200000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Good image quality (considered the sensor), optical zoom, lightness, excellent "school ship" for those who want to learn...
Cons:.jpg-only file, not included charger, non-touch display.
Opinion:I agree with much of the things said in the reviews that precede mine, but I want to point out that at 240/280 euros (depending on the seller) you do not buy a professional mirroless, it is a bridge that can teach the basic rules of photography. I bought it used at 158 euros on Ebay for my daughter and I have to say that having confidence with the Sony world there are no big problems in setting and use, optical zoom is good (the digital one I do not consider), the Iso yield is better than the smartphones of the price range with which it could be compared, great to become familiar with the photographic world.
Pros:Good overall image quality in relation to sensor, optical zoom, lightness, ergonomics, orientable display, battery life, numerous options.
Cons:High iso noise, not always precise focus, unhelpful viewfinder, lack of wi-fi, unintuitive menu.
Opinion:As a beginner I would like to make my judgment on hx350. I took it two years ago as the first camera with the intention of learning the first rudiments of photographic technique as well as to have fun, soon replaced (in the main use) with an eos 750d. I use it today to have a light camera and have fun with the long focal. The small compact sensor involves a rather marked noise at high iso as well as, in my opinion, colors rather faded in the presence of a lot of light, with the need to underexpose more, while in optimal conditions the colors are well defined and vivid: Overall the image quality is pretty good. In low light conditions, however, all the sensor limits emerge. The machine comes with all the shooting modes and numerous options (great for a beginner who wants to learn), remarkable optical zoom (1200 equivalent) and a viewfinder of not excellent quality. It is unfortunately without a wi-fi connection: the only way to transfer files to PC (or smartphone) is via usb. In summary it is great to learn and if you do not have quality claims.
Pros:Good zoom,handy,good photo rendering with light,Easy to use and ideal for "adventure" trips,reduced weight
Cons:Background noise with high ISO,Focus not always very precise,only jpg files,display not touch
Opinion:good car if you want to travel ,given the reduced weight,or take photos without too much pretension. Good machine to start shooting in manual and make bones. I paid 270 euros and it was a price more than fair! The fact that you can't shoot in raw is very limiting, if you think you want to post production on your shots. Cute effects available and good yield in hdr, both in color and black and white! To be used primarily in light condition.
Pros:Zoom facilitates use,lightness,all in one". From travel. USB chargers. Photographic quality with good light. Good grip. Autofocus.Zeiss Objective
Cons:Low quality with poor light. Cheap material. .jpg-only file. Delay with flash shot
Opinion:I already had a bridge. After a few years I changed it to a more modern one, but with the same zoom. Small step forward comparison to before,but the problem of the late snap of the flash remains even if you put it "forced" Indoors , instead with little light using iso car - you get discrete results even at high iso for a bridge 1600.Se there are contrasts of light if there are contrasts of light if there are contrasts of light if there are contrasts of light if there are contrasts of light if you may want to use the hdr. Anyway for the use I make "trekking in the mountains or gitarelle" is fine with me.
Pros:Lightness, ease of use, simple and intuitive menu, complete in its functions "handyman", threaded lens for filters Unlike many bridges where not foreseen. Good zoom focal power. Good display as definition and yield. Battery charger via USB cable connecting it directly to the power outlet. Serious and comfortable ergonomic grip.
Cons:Plasticosa, materials not fully valid, low quality electronic viewfinder and yield. Imprecise and slow focusing, suffering of background noise in low light conditions, like most bridge. Non-touch Display, JPG only file.
Opinion:I was looking for a handyman machine for battle use always ready. I wanted to buy first impact a bridge used without spending too much with the possibility of using filters, at least the most common as UV and PL. At the end from RCE Vicenza propose me new this Sony in super offer, I did not know, and after some readings and reviews I am convinced. Purchased about a month and a half ago at the figure of €300. At first impression it seemed good, full of options, choices from the menu, settings, and lens threaded for filters, detail not just in my opinion! The use in naturalistic environment, both scenic, landscapes, and details. I use it as a third machine so I don't pretend anything sophisticated or high-level. The photographic rendering in principle is good, the colors are alive and quite natural. The zoom/lens "branded Zeiss" has a discrete but not high-quality yield, good but nothing so amazing. (... In my opinion of Zeiss there is only the label!) The build quality is of low quality, not so lofty plastic, almost unserviceable electronic viewfinder, grainy vision. Much better instead the display of well higher quality. If used in the right way and in the right conditions will certainly give you satisfaction, even more if you mount a good filter PL. In principle, if you do not have special performance to ask I can consigliarvela, look for it with a price not higher than €300! Spending more on this machine is not worth it. As a rating from 0 to 10 I gave him a 7.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
