Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical

The Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, discontinued. The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization.

13 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	28-105 mm
Angle of view	75.4 - 23.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8-4
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	12 elements in 11 groups
Min. focus distance	0.5 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.18x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	405 g
Dimensions	77 x 81 mm
Buy
Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Obbes

sent on 04 Aprile 2023

Pros: Price, very sturdy construction, weight, very bright, excellent blurred.

Cons: None considered the price of used.

Opinion: I bought this used lens for 100€ per game. Mounted on Nikon D800, it was a pleasant surprise, great shots, very natural colors, pleasing to us of the old guard who come from the film. I often prefer it to the 24-120 f/4 for weight and size, not for quality, that's another thing. Excellent purchase is worth much more than it costs.

Alessio3d

sent on 04 Giugno 2018

Pros: Info

Cons: Info

Opinion: Hi, I have this lens first used on an analog and now on a good digital. I was wondering if it makes sense to switch to the Nikkor 24-120 f4 spending 450 euros! Is it worth it? Has anyone tried both? _____-____-___ _____... __ _____...... _____-_-_-_-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _____-____-___ _____... __ _____...... _____-_-_-_-_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _____-____-___ _____... __ _____...... _____-_-_-_-_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _____-____-___ _____... __ _____...... ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ ___ ____-_____... __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _____ _____-___-__-____-GrazieAlessio... _ ____-_ _ _____-_ _____

Alessio3d

Jeandemetz

sent on 05 Ottobre 2017

Pros: Great focal length, vintage colors if you like, good brightness 2.8-4, robustness Made in Japan

Cons: Definition by f / 5.6, at the maximum of color abnormalities and aberrations and little accuracy

Opinion: I bought the Sigma 28-105mm Aspherical 1: 2.8-4 lens with Minolta Attack in 2004 in a store and was used. RnThe use on the Minolta 7000 was perfect (especially 28mm wide). Lastly, I bought a Sony A350 used to revitalize the Minolta kit. The Sigma constructive quality is not discussed, it is made in Japan: solid, the handle plastics have remained soft after 13 years. Autofocus is fast and accurate for amateur employment. The 72mm diameter lets you glimpse as much glass inside.rnThe APSC sensor unfortunately misses the shots we would expect from a 28mm wide angle, and the lens shrinks to a pretty standard handset but with good brightness.rn Color rendering it is not at the top, but it may please those who are used to the film. The weak point is the definition of the details. At 28 mm up to 4.5 / 4.5 the center image is not defined precisely, it looks almost "opaque" while on the edges is assindefinite olutamente as well as suffering from aberrations. Everything improves from f / 5.6 on, where details, even at the extremes, regain a good definition and the colors become brighter and loyal. In short, it is very pleasing. Used as portraits, it retains the same defects, but the opacity mentioned above on the sides of the larger apertures could also be a pleasant and distinctive effect in which the center of the portrait is sufficiently defined with deterioration to the margins .rnAbout the good blur.rnRecommended to amateur photographers and for experimentation. An important photo that has to "stay" would not do it with Sigma but with even more modern lenses even cheaper, given the improvements that have been there over time.

Davide.bossi747

sent on 21 Gennaio 2015

Pros: Blurred very nice, the price of used convenience and optimal weight all do

Cons: For the money spent none

Opinion: Purchased for the game on ebay me 'great satisfaction for photos of interiors and portraits at the amateur level, you can not of course be compared to a fixed Nikon (50mm F1.8) has on its ease of use and cost of used really low (if lucky less than 100 €), it sells easily and is used in any situation, I use it accompanied the nikon 18-140 vr that is lower in terms of brightness on the whole but with a much faster af sigmoid

There are 1 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical

A journey through the Petrified Forest and the Capitol reff

by Luca160
14 comments, 3968 views

Lecce

by Obbes
52 comments, 730 views

Biking with your smartphone

by Germano58
6 comments, 1184 views

Old in caltagirone

by Cappellinogae
2 comments, 3989 views

Astura Tower

by Ciarla Marco
8 comments, 969 views

Torre Lapillo night

by Paolo Sevà
4 comments, 1949 views

Water or?

by Paolo Sevà
0 comments, 2476 views

Francesca

by Paolo Sevà
0 comments, 3333 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Lonely bench

by Germano58
2 comments, 1165 views

Untitled Photo

by Obbes
5 comments, 461 views

The warmth of the heart ..!

by Paolo Sevà
4 comments, 1702 views

Untitled Photo

by Tizio71
0 comments, 821 views

Nun me mast ...

by Delta71
0 comments, 2031 views

Interweaving

by Germano58
2 comments, 1080 views

Crib custonaci

by Cappellinogae
1 comments, 1821 views

Untitled Photo

by Obbes
5 comments, 494 views

Tower Astura

by Ciarla Marco
10 comments, 917 views

Untitled Photo

by Obbes
5 comments, 435 views

Heat !!!

by Paolo Sevà
2 comments, 1446 views

Untitled Photo

by StefanoM72
5 comments, 711 views

Francesca 2

by Paolo Sevà
0 comments, 1879 views

Capalbio

by Arijillo
2 comments, 181 views

Sunset at Fiumicino

by Arijillo
2 comments, 168 views

Crib custonaci

by Cappellinogae
0 comments, 1928 views

Untitled Photo

by Jarno77
0 comments, 1653 views

Untitled Photo

by Jarno77
1 comments, 1799 views

2019

by Daneleo
0 comments, 677 views

Untitled Photo

by Obbes
2 comments, 310 views

Budapest-11007

by Alvale
2 comments, 356 views

C/2023 A3 Tsuchinshan-ATLAS

by Arijillo
4 comments, 193 views

Nigeria 2017

by Mautente
0 comments, 789 views

Arquata del Tronto before the earthquake

by Ciarla Marco
3 comments, 352 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Street music

by Paolo Sevà
2 comments, 866 views

The "Mustache most famous d 'Italy"

by Paolo Sevà
0 comments, 1885 views

Low tide

by Alessio3d
0 comments, 874 views

SAX

by Delta71
0 comments, 1640 views

St. Peter's

by Arijillo
0 comments, 148 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think?

Photos taken with Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4 Aspherical