JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Sigma 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG C is a superzoom lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2025. The focus is done by Linear Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 899 €;
4 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
L-Mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C L-Mount.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:I think every photographer's dream is from 20 to 200 in a single lens, light and really small. Decent image quality good containment in camera (Sony) of distortion and vignetting, otherwise noticeable at 20mm.
Cons:Zoom ring really hard, so much so that the lens lock is useless. A note on the lens hood that is well done but that in order not to vignette at 20 mm is very small making it almost useless, especially in the winter months when the sun is always low.
Opinion:Taken as a replacement for the tamron 28-200 to be able to leave the 20-70 at home and have only the camera around your neck with only one lens. How are you? Roughly with the same general quality as the tamron which however was 2.8/5.6, considering however that to have a good quality with this kind of lenses you have to ask at f8 at least and therefore little changes. Maybe it's because I'm a certain age, but I couldn't stand to go around with a backpack full of heavy lenses, which will have a better image quality (not that much, especially considering the huge price difference), but that for those like me who make a photographic genre of "seize the day" and you don't always have time to replace the lens under penalty of losing the photo. I have done many tests in these days and by setting the colors and image parameters in the camera (Sony A7 IV) I can say that I am satisfied with the images it returns. A great extra gear for those who do street. I leave out all the technical speeches, abberations, distortions, vignetting and I leave it to the machine to solve them, which does it very well. If you don't have special needs, but like to focus on the content of an image knowing that you will always know that you have the right focal length at the right time already in the camera, that's a lot of stuff!
Pros:Practicality, versatility, lightweight, compact, good overall image quality.
Cons:A bit of distortion at 20mm, slight drop at the edges at wide-angle focal lengths but nothing excessive, a bit dark, zoom ring that turns in reverse compared to Sony
Opinion:The lens is well built, plastic yes, but not cheap, in line with contemporary Sigma. Dimensions and weight are relatively compact for the type of lens. Well-frictioned dials, a bit hard in the first part, that of the zoom. Average lens hood, attaches well. Let's move on to the impressions about the photos. Sharpness, also excellent at t.a. from 35mm to 200mm even at the edges, while from 20mm to 28mm it remains excellent in the center while it drops a little at the edges (nothing tragic safely usable) however it is advisable to close a stop if you want a uniform performance. The discourse of sharpness applies to both short and long distances. In general much much better than I expected on 42mpx. (I use a Sony A7R3) Chromatic aberrations in the norm, pretty good blur and good flare resistance. Backlit star that is not bad at all between f14 and f18 especially in wide-angle focal lengths. Always consider that we are talking about an all-rounder zoom. The only drawback to be picky is a bit dark and with a rather important distortion and vignetting between 20 and 28mm but nothing impossible to correct in post. (Currently there is no profile for lightroom, I have used for now the profile of a 28-200 sigma modifying it slightly) Precise and fairly fast AF. The macro capabilities of 1:2 from 20mm up to 85mm are remarkable. In short, I would say that it is worth what it costs, nothing to do with the "zoomons" built up to a few years ago. I don't regret the sony 24-105 I traded it in.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
