JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S

The Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S is a supertele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012 to 2022 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 3110 €;

45 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sigma SA: this lens is compatible with reflex and mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sigma SA-mount.

Specifications
Focal lenght	120-300 mm
Angle of view	20.5 - 8.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	23 elements in 18 groups
Min. focus distance	1.50 - 2.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.13x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	105 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	3390 g
Dimensions	124 x 291 mm
Buy
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Salmon

sent on May 28, 2015

Pros: Non

Cons: Weigt, slow af, sharpnes, tripod socked not smooth.

Opinion: the one i had was a bad monday morning product, it need to be adjust a lot on the af fine tuning. After that it was stil not sharp. Sigma Benelux left me with it they sey it was within there specs. Bad aftersale by sigma, at the end i swap the lens for one used nikon 300 mm 2.8. I have lost 500 euro because the shop did not want to give back the money. Make sure you get a sharp one, Sigma stil has bad ones between the the beter ones, they all perform different. So to me all Sigma can stay with Sigma !!!

Grau Christian

sent on October 05, 2014

Pros: Very sharp, even at f 2.8, albeit at 5,6 it becomes more than excellent. Built as a tank! Unique versatility. AF very fast. Very handy and sturdy tripod socket.

Cons: The weight: it is a very fat boy! Handholding it for a long period may be a problem...You'll need quickly a monopod...or a tripod! But it is...a zoom, unique in its category, so..."what did you expect"? The hood in reverse position does not lock well.

Opinion: I like it! I use it mainly for wildlife photography (mammals and birds). I have tested it with both Canon teleconverters (III generation): with the 1,4 TC, the loss of sharpness is not noticeable; attached with the X2 TC, the results are yet good (if not very good) and the lack of sharpness is not that big! My opinion is that it is a very good telelens!

Sjvirum

sent on August 02, 2013

Pros: Build quality, sharpness, versatility, and with extenders you get an excellent 420f/4 and a good 600f/5.6, if you stop down to 7.1 or 8.0 it gets very good

Cons: Weight, you have to be very strong to handhold it all day, a monopod is required!

Opinion: I bought this lens a few weeks ago, and i have done a little testing. The bare lens is excellent, a little soft on 2.8 but nothing to worry about. I have tested the lens with Canon 2xext.III, and i think it is very promising. I also bought the USB DOCK, and it works fine, but you CANNOT microadjust with canon extenders on the lens, you will have to do it in camera, i have adjustet to -10 with the 2xext.III, and it looks good. I have a small test gallery under my profile.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Ferorake

sent on August 26, 2019

Pros: Price to be a 300 2.8 with even the lower focal points, all-metal egregious construction, set with wide freedom via USB dock, all in all balanced

Cons: Image quality far from fixed 300 2.8, AF incomparable to fixed 300 2.8, scary focus breathing, unusable filters (there is no drawer for filters near the bayonet )

Opinion: We assume that as usual reviews are done with your feet. The lens has no "great sharpness" either in the center, let alone at the edges of F2.8. It's not shoddy for charity, but far from a 300 2.8 (Nikon or Canon doesn't matter). The guy who can't mount the lampshade should read the instructions. It is perhaps one of the best Sigma, being yes all metal, but having a double hooking system: first you have to "snap" spring, and then you have to tighten a screw (classic supertele screw ). Of course, if you just screw the screw, fall. Macchinoso all for charity, however in the end makes the lampshade on the lens and without unwanted reflections (to put it mildly the various 500 f4 Nikon of the past and the like had a gap between body and lampshade, this does not ). It should be noted that the optical scheme is the same as the old non-Sport version, so the problem of focus breathing remained (at 300mm at the minimum distance of MF is kind of a 150mm, well). The AF is absurdly MINUS VELOCE of 150-600 sports. Both docked on speed priority, the zoommone is faster. This has a little bit of a fuss, I have to confess that I expected more. Of course, you must not forget that you have in your hands a 300 2.8 with the possibility of "getting away" up to 120mm, at a price practically low compared to the counterpart. In fact, a good 300 2.8 of the Nikon-Canon home will cost us at least twice as much. In the used something can be found at the same price, but always overused and with the possibility that it will leave us at any moment. I recommend it to anyone who makes indoor sports photography or absolutely needs to stretch the focal point compared to a classic 70-200, as long as it has an easel. Freehand I doubt you can photograph with this beast for more than 30 minutes (despite the excellent stabilizer). In money, taken used on the 2000-2500 has its because, new to 4000 frankly loses sense, and I would prefer it a 300 2.8 used. Not recommended on Sony, used on the A9 has a very slow hook, in my opinion not exploitable in work contexts. Once hooked it does not lose fire, but you have to hook...

Alberto Serra

sent on September 21, 2018

Pros: Great sharpness (including edges) also at f/2.8, colors and contrast superb, precise autofocus and very fast at all focal, fluid ring nuts, generous transport handle (useful and convenient for hand transport). Incredible stabilizer (with selector), possibility to limit the range of MF, possibility to update the firmware of the Xon lens the dock (to adjust MF etc).

Cons: Weight (at the limit of use freehand if you are not "Palestrati") and... especially the hood (at rest comes off or easily engages the lens body, not to mention the fastening wheel that you take in anywhere), mounted in operation, just a shot and you Detach (especially taking him to the side in the mountains...), sometimes it is difficult to find the joint to fix it...!! Moreover it is metal, as if the weight of the body is not enough! Does anyone know if there are any third party lens hoods? Filters from 105 (costs a bang the only "neutral")

Opinion: A lens that produces extraordinary photos, of great realism for sharpness/contrast/colours at all the focal lengths and at all apertures even already from F/2.8 (I use it at most up to F/8). Great brightness. Incredibly stimulation and useful stabilizer, with selector 0/1/2. The MF is absolutely fast and precise, silent, even with little light (with D750). Possibility to limit the range of MF to speed up further (especially if the light is low). I used it with Sigma Sigma APO 1.4 x EX DG with amazing results. Negative element is undoubtedly the weight of about 3kg that makes it difficult to transport in trekking (backpack or flank) and use freehand! Perhaps it is more an excellent and irreplaceable lens from African safari with car, shed or otherwise mounted on support. Another negative element is the hallucinating lens hood, of which I wrote among the "cons"

There are 8 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S

Deadvlei, Who

by Rent23
65 comments, 15724 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.6 MP

Polar bear

by Claude-alain Nacht
80 comments, 16500 views

Heads Down, Tongues Out!

by Dramtastic
192 comments, 11508 views [editors pick]

A Kings Golden Crown

by Dramtastic
136 comments, 6340 views

White arrow

by Emilio63
98 comments, 18003 views [editors pick]

Intense!

by Dramtastic
162 comments, 9734 views

Barn Owl Embrace

by Dramtastic
168 comments, 12143 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

Ermine wheel

by Emilio63
69 comments, 13225 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The Two Cities

by Lorenzo Crovetto
109 comments, 11661 views

Red black and white

by Emilio63
89 comments, 11831 views [editors pick]

Goshawk

by Emilio63
47 comments, 6337 views

Scent of a Woman

by Dramtastic
99 comments, 5199 views

Snowy-bellied Hummingbird

by Dramtastic
148 comments, 13575 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

Duna in the desert

by Rent23
37 comments, 4002 views

HI RES 5.7 MP

The House in the Purple

by Nikp
52 comments, 2327 views

The light and the darkness

by Dramtastic
106 comments, 4312 views

HI RES 3.6 MP

Osprey vs Crow

by Dramtastic
133 comments, 9491 views

HI RES 7.3 MP

Ermine

by Emilio63
33 comments, 8333 views

Ermine in split

by Emilio63
35 comments, 7459 views

Night Vision Goggles

by Dramtastic
105 comments, 4785 views

And 'spring

by Scap73
59 comments, 6754 views

Today frogs ....

by Scap73
55 comments, 6387 views

Success!

by Dramtastic
100 comments, 5664 views

HI RES 15.5 MP

Nsuku

by Dramtastic
92 comments, 3543 views

Back Off!

by Dramtastic
104 comments, 5279 views

Turkish poof

by Gaetano Perego
51 comments, 2960 views

Whiskers and Teeth

by Dramtastic
87 comments, 3214 views

Queen of the Night

by Dramtastic
104 comments, 3254 views

Here come the B-Boys!

by Dramtastic
63 comments, 3271 views

40,000 Muscles

by Dramtastic
67 comments, 3599 views

Team Badass!

by Dramtastic
82 comments, 3779 views

Her Majesty

by Dramtastic
108 comments, 5063 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Speed Bumps and Road Spikes Africa Style

by Dramtastic
76 comments, 2560 views

We own the night! - Buon Natale e Buone Feste

by Dramtastic
89 comments, 2836 views

Goshawk

by Emilio63
43 comments, 6669 views

Surfing in Lavagna

by Lorenzo Crovetto
59 comments, 4544 views

Goshawk

by Enrico Delvai
33 comments, 4232 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM S