|
| sent on 20 Ottobre 2019
Pros: - Value for money (2019). - ECCELLE in portraits and landscaping, for colors the superfine detail and above average resolution (28 mpx). - Detail in 4k videos. - Functions almost from smartphones between filters, editing possibilities and Wi-Fi connectivity - bluetooth.
Cons: - Absent sight on the body (sold at a very high price and impossible to find). - Sufficient low-light freehand shots but not up to the height of an F.F. - Optics (few and rare) that once used for her can be thrown away because they do not have a future.
Opinion: I bought it in August 2019 in a reasoned way since, wanting to make good "photography", in the cheapest way possible, I noticed that DXOM-rk put this machine, (buyable used at attractive prices), to a stunning 40th place among "monsters "Sacred" like Leica M10... I found it at only 350 degrees (body) and when I got home I tried it with the standard 18-55 ois that I had left from the nx3000 and I swear to you: I was going to throw it away. Very distorted shots, high graininess even at low ISO and yellowing as the light goes down, I wanted to split it, 350 degrees thrown away I thought... Meanwhile, hurriedly, the week before I had bought a 45mm f1.8, and as I was about to close the deal by selling it to a guy on Subit, I got home the new goal. Curious, lost to lose, I fitted him to try and.... I was in disbelief... The machine went from discreet to ECCELLENTE. I found that the 18-55 and 20-50 are not at all suitable for the high performance but overthrusts of this backlit sensor (a bit like mounting a very small intercooler to a 3000 turbo petrol machine), which is precisely true that it is an APSC, but not being great as an F.F. needs "quality" lenses and a good opening to give it its all. Convinced with an excuse I kept it and studying the manual thoroughly I discovered that this machine is a "bomb", especially in the landscape, with the 16mm f2.4 gives panormami worthy of an Alpha 7-7s, Nikon D610-750. Obviously where she is overcome with low hands by the aforementioned is in the freehand shots made at low brightness, where A7 and D610 manage to give "perfection" even with very low exposure times. With the NX500 I churned out evening files of ALTA quality on one condition: easel, long exposure and a good goal, as I said, forget the Standard Lens kit. It is a machine that wants its tricks and its "cuddles", after which it can give enormous satisfaction, since (with the 45mm f1.8 for example) churns out RAW in very "standard" colors without chromatic aberrations, white lights neither hot nor cold, deep black and not disturbed, everything up to 1600 ISO impeccably, in short I would say perfect to work then in posts without "killing yourself". I recommend shooting fHD a50p videos, the 24p of the 4K although of superb quality is fine only in case of quite "quiet" videos where the framed subjects move little or nothing, otherwise you will start to notice the vintage film effect. Defects? I discovered from the original Samsung site that the additional viewfinder exists... but it's nowhere to be found. For the rest I keep it and I am particularly jealous, since my classmates with the money I spent, yes are bought only an EOS 2000d that does not have a quarter of the performance of this flagship, unfortunately but without future... |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
