JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 : Specifications and Opinions

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 is a superzoom lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 870 €;

23 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	12-200 mm
Angle of view	84 - 6.2° (equivalent to a 24-404mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/3.5-6.3
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 11 groups
Min. focus distance	0.22 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.46x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	455 g
Dimensions	78 x 100 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Iride_Blu

sent on January 02, 2025

Pros: Versatility, lightness, ridiculous cost for what it offers, tropicalization.

Cons: Once you "understand" no cons, indeed, the only one is that you risk stopping using other lenses.

Opinion: To criticize this lens as I often see done, appealing to quality, you have to be a bit silly. It is obvious that it is not a pro lens, it is obvious that it comes out defeated against any other lens (in the range of competence of the other lenses) but heck you just have to understand what its function is! I'll just say one thing, nature or the stories to be told don't wait for you to change your goal. If something happens to you at 100 or 5 meters you risk losing at least one or worse both shots if you don't have the right lens. Clearly the price to pay is the general quality, but are we so sure? Just pass the RAW through one of the many software such as DXO Pure RAW and by magic you will see your shot sharper and less noisy. It's like looking at a photo before and after putting on glasses. Sharpness will not be an issue. You will therefore understand that in certain situations (travel, reportage, street) it is better to have this companion rather than 2/3 lenses dancing in the bag. To recap: the big pro is having a more than decent lens (all of them shot for National Geographic?) and never having to change it at least until sunset. There is no other system in the world a 24-400 equivalent (and trust me that you would complain about that too if it existed, since it would weigh at least 400 grams more, cost over 1200 euros and would not fit in your bag). Then it is light and tropicalized!! I used it on a second body for a safari, it means a finger of sand on the camera. Result? Sensor and glasses as before leaving. Trust me, you would NEVER want to have to change lenses on a safari. Last pro the price: € 500 means that you have to buy it and have it. You won't regret it. Trust. We all want Pro lenses but then you have to feel like carrying them with you even in the places, in the medina of Marrakech, in Indochina, in Caracas.. not only in Scandinavia or Tokyo. So watch out.

Mattia Campos

sent on May 05, 2024

Pros: Versatility, weight, price, size, autofocus, maximum equivalent magnification 0.46x

Cons: Brightness (when there is little light) and consequent poor detachment of the planes

Opinion: It's a "super" all-rounder more than honest, indeed good ... I don't know that there is another lens on the market that covers from 24 to 400mm weighing 450g and costing just over 500 euros .... For travel and reportage it's fine, but also to do something more. In fact, the autofocus is very fast and accurate, I would never have imagined it... The optical quality is good-fair, the sharpness is more than acceptable, as long as there is light everything is fine, when the light drops the limits emerge mainly due to the low light that "prevents" a dynamic use at sunset and in the evening. It still does well at events, even with low light, such as concerts, theaters, where you can use relatively slow times, and in combination with the OM1 you can even go up to 6400 ISO or more with excellent results. It is certainly not suitable for those who want to go and see the 100% crisp detail, and for sharpness freaks or for those who want to see subjects always well detached from the background and in evidence .... who on the other hand would not be happy even with a Nikon 28-400, which costs 1600 euros, weighs 300 grams more and lacks the 24mm at the bottom ... or with a Tamron 18-300 for apsc that weighs 200 grams more and doesn't have the 24mm at the bottom. Overall it's a fun and very comfortable lens that does its honest job and even something more... Although personally, being very demanding, and not liking compromises, I rarely use it.... But still, it can fit in my kit

Rick68

sent on September 28, 2023

Pros: Long focal length and low weight

Cons: Everything else

Opinion: I bought this lens shortly after its release, thinking I had found the ultimate lens for travel. I used it for three years, trying to convince myself that all in all it could be fine, but in the end I sold it out of desperation, losing 200 euros, and I took the 12-100 Pro. Unfortunately, the image quality of this zoom is very low; I'm not talking about brightness, because that's not the problem: lack of detail, grainy images, lack of contrast, confusing and unpleasant bokeh and in the 12-50 range, where many say that it is fine like other kit lenses, it behaves equally badly, with a decent image in the center but on the edges completely blurred. If I compare it to the lumix 12-60 f3.5-5.6, it comes out destroyed. I like Olympus lenses, but this one you'd better put it out of production.

Robygio

sent on April 25, 2023

Pros: Very extended focal range, weight all in all contained and not excessive bulk

Cons: Where to start... would surely finish Penelope her canvas sooner

Opinion: Needless to waste words, better a lapidary comment: leave it alone, wait a moment if necessary but take the 12-100, another planet or at least the 14-140 Panasonic. Undoubtedly Olympus will have been moved by good intentions, but the result is certainly, to love her, reviewable. Obviously pparlo of optical quality, not comparable in the least to what good this brand offers us, even with wide excursion zoom.

Lastpeanut

sent on August 19, 2022

Pros: weight

Cons: quality over 100 mm

Opinion: Purchased and resold again under warranty. Acceptable only up to 100 mm and, considering that Oly offers a 12/100 pro at new and used prices currently very affordable, in comparison there is no history. This judgment of mine does not derive from an occasional use, but from the observation of its obvious limitations. Even in the use for street photography, where quality is not the main element, it made me work a lot in post-production to mask its defects. Not recommended

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

Point of view

by Lastpeanut
46 comments, 4634 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Don't Stand so Close to Me (Police - 1980)

by Cicca
23 comments, 6655 views

HI RES 6.4 MP

Natural contrasts

by Norvegia04
112 comments, 2564 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Capital vices

by Lastpeanut
41 comments, 3166 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Come on, give me a peanut...

by Norvegia04
93 comments, 2563 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Infinite vineyard!!!

by Ginolimbianchino
122 comments, 2325 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Sunset in the tropics

by Lastpeanut
37 comments, 1693 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

A tram style Paogar

by Lastpeanut
22 comments, 2009 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Happy Easter friends!

by Norvegia04
78 comments, 2834 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

How we reason

by Lastpeanut
30 comments, 1496 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Sunset in the desert

by Lastpeanut
29 comments, 1425 views

Sometimes they smile

by Lastpeanut
17 comments, 2757 views

Fetish

by Lastpeanut
26 comments, 1843 views

Wait till I put on a pose...

by Norvegia04
46 comments, 1812 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Cute sheep

by Marco Fagioli Fermo
4 comments, 1825 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

Hard-working apina

by Norvegia04
42 comments, 1318 views

HI RES 8.7 MP

Fontanalba

by Sam63
7 comments, 389 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Opss....

by Marcello del Vecchio
14 comments, 1879 views

Waiting

by Marco Fagioli Fermo
3 comments, 1068 views

HI RES 15.6 MP

Try catching heron in flight

by Norvegia04
35 comments, 1570 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

Supermoon

by v60
7 comments, 2525 views

... face to face.... with the fox

by Franca Abello
10 comments, 1164 views

By chance in Venice.

by v60
5 comments, 859 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

19 Lambrate station

by Marcello del Vecchio
8 comments, 1493 views

Curve

by Pierluigi Garis
3 comments, 1786 views

HI RES 7.6 MP

Lights and shadows!!!

by Ginolimbianchino
80 comments, 1536 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Tired.

by Walter Iannello
0 comments, 1081 views

Contrasts... Church of San Peyre - Stroppo - Maira Valley

by Franca Abello
6 comments, 901 views

HI RES 18.5 MP

Caiman

by Marcello del Vecchio
0 comments, 1230 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

REFLECTIONS

by Marcello del Vecchio
14 comments, 836 views

Sea storm

by Sam63
4 comments, 323 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

Through the alleys

by v60
8 comments, 854 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Matterhorn

by Libi_cz
1 comments, 444 views

HI RES 11.9 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

In The Fold

by Pierluigi Garis
3 comments, 1407 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Pirogue

by Robibracco
3 comments, 1057 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

No title

by Yanez
6 comments, 531 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Textures in nature

by Daniela Alessi
2 comments, 227 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Olympus » Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3