JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2283 €;
67 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 182000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness, autofocus speed, construction, bokeh, vr effective and lightness
Cons:ring without blocks in any focal, inverted dial compared to what it should be, too soft dials, price if not taken import
Opinion:First experience with positive pro nikon optics. Excellent in everything and I preferred it to Sigma 70-200 Sport because of the weight. 400g less feel. The only bad thing for me is the dials. Really too soft, which can also be a value at certain times, only that it really takes a breath to make them turn and since there is no blockage, nor at 70 ne to 200, you could move even if you don't want to. For example, sigma has beautiful hardlines and it is more difficult to happen. For the rest I can only praise, even the weight is a feather especially when compared to the new sigma. Taken import paying it the right and it's worth it.
Cons:Weight, weight, weight... ah, I forgot... Weight!
Opinion:It's my first 70-200 and I have to say it's a fantastic view. Sharp, fast autofocus and creamy blurry. The "balance" weight is something I wasn't used to, but I don't do text (I come, in fact, from a 70-300 VR that weighs less than half and is still a very good goal, also very very sharp, albeit dark). I did a three-hour shoot with him today and i came out with my arms slaughtered... However, it gives satisfaction to the mere fact of holding it in his hands, and with the D3s and the D810 with BG it balances well. The construction is solid and anything but "plastic" (and we would also miss it!). He obviously gives his best with the Big-Mpx. VR keeps its promises and "enters" very quickly. The cost is high, but it is known at the outset, so it is not to be counted among the cons... and this quality pays dearly.
Opinion:I switched from version vr2 to Vr and FL as they baptized it, what about, I agree with most of the opinions described by friends. The first thing I noticed is the AF, lightning-fast in all circumstances. The second thing is the sharpness at all focal lengths with aperture at f/2.8. I have to get used to it again with the focal ring moved forward, but having only two days is normal, I'll get used to it. For the rest of the stellar optics, if you have the opportunity to take it you can not miss in a kit Nikon.Su d850 expresses its full potential. Vote 10 and praise. After a while ' to have tried it I can only emphasize what has been written before, indeed to all those who have doubts what is better or which 70/200 2.8 choose, do not waste time, if you have the chance the Nikon is the top of the top.
Pros:nitidezza\\improved contrast to previous version, softer bokeh, focus breathing finally eliminated, AF Fulmineo, zoom ring "buttery"
Cons:Non-granitic construction but justified by the weight
Opinion:What about, a simply magnificent lens. Obviously it is not a portrait lens, buy it to use it for this is sheer madness. It is a lens for professionals needing the TOP. Combined with an AF module like that of the D5\\D500 allows a margin of error perhaps of 1%, no more. It has an image quality that can be surpassed only by lofty landlines as it can be a Zeiss 135mm F2 or an 85mm f1.4, so it will allow weddings and similar events leaving the fixed in the bag for the most time-consuming. It has no flaws, needless to mention the price. A professional as it should if the Nital official pays off with 1 \ \ 2 events. If then the work of photographer in Italy now pays change, it is not the fault of Nikon, and certainly can not sell zoom of the genre to €500 because now there are matrimonalists who take €300 to service photographing with the 600d and 18-200. In 2019 this 70-200 is still the definitive tool for professionals who eat with photography (and it will be for a long while), and does not care to buy a Tamron or a Sigma to save on reliability and operational speed. Note that it is not a simple "reboot" of the VR II, but has fixed the hateful problem of focus breathing, and has visibly improved the contrast to f 2.8.
Opinion:I use it mainly for the portrait and is able, despite its maximum hole to 2.8, to give you a remarkable blurred... placed and glued to my D850 never again disassembled... Crisp to 5.6/manages to be particularly sharp and interesting to 2.8.... nonostanze its price is particularly high I feel to recommend it serenely.. My vote is definitely a 10 dry
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
