RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR : Specifications and Opinions




Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VRNikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR



The Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2501 €;
87 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   70-200 mm
 Angle of view   34.4 - 12.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   22 elements in 18 groups
 Min. focus distance   1.10 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.21x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, interal
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   1430 g
 Dimensions   89 x 203 mm
Buy Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR, buy on Ebay


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 209000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on March 15, 2020

Pros: AF speed, lightness, excellent resaleability

Cons: structure dangerously similar to the plastic structure of the 24-70 VR, buttons

Opinion: Good AF speed (but not higher than VR2), excellent VR, excellent optical performance but I can honestly say, having owned them at the same time, that such performance – VR aside – is absolutely INDISTINGUISHABLE from those of VR2. And I say this in the face of several double-blind sessions performed with two different groups here in Rome. Those who describe different performances between the two have not had them together at the same time, that is, they have problems with visus, or they have to justify to themselves a compulsive purchase, or even is a fanatical Taliban of the brand. PRO optics are those that resist the stresses of working activity allow the professional to take home photos to earn the loaf of loaf and this is absolutely not the case. The VR2 was externally constructed of magnesium alloy and was clearly seen while the FL resembles a plastic, that solidity is a distant memory, the only part that in my eyes appears solid is the bracket that also this time seems to ignore that there is the Arca Swiss attack. The buttons on such a short focal lens are absolutely useless to me. Always the Taliban of the brand like to point out that the breathing focus has been eliminated: nothing could be more false, the FB is still there although very small. But the FB of the VR2 was absolutely not a fault, it was part of the project specifications and allowed you to shoot even inside cramped spaces, such as a small room... Therefore, if you take every emphasis, those who today consider buying the FL still buy an excellent SEMI PRO optics that, if they do not take a few bottarella on the barrel (the de-financing of the lenses on the plasticons of a certain length is always around the corner) will give nice satisfactions. It will give so to speak, given the cost of the official product. NB: I now have it and I keep it, I am all in all satisfied, I took off the VR2 before it fell in price but, I repeat, on the dense sensor of the 850 the performance is absolutely similar ...

avatarjunior
sent on December 16, 2019

Pros: Resolution and sharpness, very fast in focus, excellent color rendering. Excellent keeping of the price of the used. (Price to new European import with Italian guarantee much cheaper than the official importer.)

Cons: Nothing particular. It is initially necessary to become familiar with the inverted dials; also not to move them accidentally being very soft.

Opinion: Before buying it, about four months ago, I considered the previous VR version, the Tamron g2 and the Sigma Sport. With everyone, courtesy of a shop in my town, I took a few test shots. In the end I decided for the Nikkor FL. If you have to drown, you might as well do it in the sea!! It is not secondary to switch ALL metadata, including fixes, to PS. Not only do technical tests place it on top of all the others, including Sony G Master, but also in concrete use it has proven unbeatable. Only in some cases, by direct comparison, has it proved to be no less or equal. Stunning chromatic yield. Generally mind-blowing focus speed; it is very difficult to get him into difficulty, (but not impossible). VR does its job well. Of course, like all zooms, you can't compare it to the quality of a fixed optics, but the lack makes it feel only on rare and particular occasions.

avatarjunior
sent on November 13, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, focus breathing virtually null, autofocus speed, construction, bokeh, vr effective and lightness

Cons: ring without blocks in any focal, inverted dial compared to what it should be, too soft dials, price if not taken import

Opinion: First experience with positive pro nikon optics. Excellent in everything and I preferred it to Sigma 70-200 Sport because of the weight. 400g less feel. The only bad thing for me is the dials. Really too soft, which can also be a value at certain times, only that it really takes a breath to make them turn and since there is no blockage, nor at 70 ne to 200, you could move even if you don't want to. For example, sigma has beautiful hardlines and it is more difficult to happen. For the rest I can only praise, even the weight is a feather especially when compared to the new sigma. Taken import paying it the right and it's worth it.

avatarjunior
sent on August 09, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, autofocus speed, bokeh, construction, VR.

Cons: Excessively soft ice. Weight, weight, weight... Ah, I forgot... Weight!

Opinion: It's my first 70-200 and I have to say it's a fantastic view. Sharp, fast autofocus and creamy fuzzy. The weight from "bilico" is something to which I was not used, but I do not make text (I come, in fact, from a 70-300 VR that weighs less than half and is still a very good goal, also very sharp, albeit dark). I did a three-hour shoot with him today and I came out with my arms slaughtered... however, it gives satisfaction just to hold it in your hands, and with the D3s and the D810 with BG it balances well. The construction is solid (and we would miss it too!). He obviously gives his best with the Big-Mpx. VR keeps its promises and "enters" very quickly. The cost is high, but you know at the start.

avatarjunior
sent on March 02, 2019

Pros: Pro

Cons: Price

Opinion: I switched from version vr2 to Vr and FL as they baptized it, what about, I agree with most of the opinions described by friends. The first thing I noticed is the AF, lightning-fast in all circumstances. The second thing is the sharpness at all focal lengths with aperture at f/2.8. I have to get used to it again with the focal ring moved forward, but having only two days is normal, I'll get used to it. For the rest of the stellar optics, if you have the opportunity to take it you can not miss in a kit Nikon.Su d850 expresses its full potential. Vote 10 and praise. After a while ' to have tried it I can only emphasize what has been written before, indeed to all those who have doubts what is better or which 70/200 2.8 choose, do not waste time, if you have the chance the Nikon is the top of the top.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Foto
The Moscardino (the smallest of the ghiri)
by Mirko M
151 comments, 8695 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Walrus
by Coloretoscano
86 comments, 11436 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Emotions of the Camargue
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
37 comments, 9120 views
Foto
Dynamics of Martin's fishery
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
40 comments, 5590 views
Foto
Tattooed smoker woman
by Sergio Pan
54 comments, 11677 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
U-Bein Bridge, Mandalay, Myanmar
by Genesis
71 comments, 2481 views
Foto
Egret
by Stardust
90 comments, 6907 views
Foto
A penny for your thoughts ...
by Sergio Pan
61 comments, 7068 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 6.8 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Rose
by Alanmontesanto
26 comments, 8698 views
Foto
The relaxing movement of water
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
25 comments, 7375 views
Foto
Blizzard Train on Landwasserviadukt
by Nikp
46 comments, 2046 views
Foto
Sunset at Castelluccio July 2018
by Luca Scortegagna
65 comments, 2510 views  
HI RES 11.1 MP

Foto
The Winter of the Ibexes
by André Roveyaz
96 comments, 2686 views
Foto
Halloween Night
by Maryas
109 comments, 1874 views  
HI RES 6.3 MP

Foto
Crocus
by Maryas
108 comments, 1591 views  
HI RES 6.3 MP

Foto
I want to run!
by Alessandrouttaro
41 comments, 2320 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 11.8 MP

Foto
Sunrise at Lake Closed
by Gianni Aggravi
80 comments, 1514 views
Foto
Winnowing the Weat
by Sergio Pan
58 comments, 3478 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
Gray woodpecker and red woodpecker on the same plant
by Barito.mario
54 comments, 1440 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Foto
The Survivors
by Gianni Aggravi
80 comments, 1635 views
Foto
Jay
by Barito.mario
50 comments, 1140 views  
HI RES 5.6 MP

Foto
U-Pain Bridge, Mandalay Myanmar
by Genesis
48 comments, 1643 views
Foto
The lights of the night
by Werner
268 comments, 4157 views  
HI RES 16.2 MP

Foto
Gea
by Alanmontesanto
58 comments, 7188 views
Foto
There's a little princess in the castle vineyard
by Alberto Ghizzi Panizza
25 comments, 3091 views
Foto
Ethiopia
by Genesis
29 comments, 1529 views
Foto
Vital at dawn
by Gianni Aggravi
78 comments, 1722 views  
HI RES 4.7 MP

Foto
No snowflake ever falls in the wrong place
by EmanueleCodello
43 comments, 524 views
Foto
The girl raised her eyes
by Sergio Pan
39 comments, 2745 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
Castelluccio 2018
by Sergio Vezzaro
50 comments, 2789 views
Foto
Perfect reflex
by Nikp
57 comments, 1087 views
Foto
Sitting on the train
by Sergio Pan
30 comments, 3959 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
Tuscany
by Mauro Maione
33 comments, 1499 views  
HI RES 36.2 MP

Foto
Sibillini
by Sergio Vezzaro
27 comments, 1740 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Perfect view
by Igor Shilokhvost
29 comments, 1310 views
Foto
Ibex
by André Roveyaz
51 comments, 1299 views
Foto
Race for sled dogs in Sesto
by Werner
209 comments, 2552 views  
HI RES 13.1 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me