JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX : Specifications and Opinions

Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX

The Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX is a extender lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 190 €;

12 users have given it an average vote of 8.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Lenses/Groups	3 elements in 2 groups
Weather sealing	No
Weight	110 g
Dimensions	74 x 25 mm
Buy
Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Gianni-Nikon

sent on January 11, 2023

Pros: Lightweight, well built, acceptable price.

Cons: For the moment nothing

Opinion: I bought this Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX to have with me the possibility of a larger lens, I knew from the beginning that it was a terno to the lot because when you buy a third-party home multiplier you know that it has a generic compatibility, they are not like those of the camera parent company, so it can happen that on a Nikon 70-300 mm it works as a god while on a Tamron or Sigma of the same focal length is A flop. I am a lover of primary lenses but when you go on vacation with the family zooms are a nice solution for a hasty but quality photo and the duplicator comes to the rescue because if it is suitable for our lenses with little weight it turns a 300 mm into a 420mm. Honestly I have it since 2016 but I think I have used it 4 times, from here you understand how much is the real need to own it and its usefulness, it is also true that carrying a 400 mm in your backpack is much heavier than a duplicator knowing that maybe you will not use it, that's why I bought it. Before shopping, however, I inquired if: it was compatible with my 70-300mm, if it was compatible with my camera body, if it kept the focus, if the photo lost quality, having found these questions positive answers decided to purchase and I do not regret it.

Lorenzo Carta

sent on May 06, 2021

Pros: price

Cons: compatibility

Opinion: I tried it on my canon 90d, with tamron 150-600 autofocus does not work.with tamron 90mm does not work autofocus.I think I will return it.however I took some shots with AFmanuale and in my opinion the optics in both cases maintain a certain level of quality.if there were any page of the manufacturer that specifies better compatibility would not be bad.

Miopiartistica

sent on February 26, 2021

Pros: Price, compatibility, weight and size

Cons: Image quality, especially chromatic aberrations

Opinion: A cheap little toy to keep in your bag. Used with the canon 55-250 efs works discreetly, but at the maximum focal point the autofocus becomes quite slow and struggles to hook the subject, in poor light conditions sometimes it does not make it. But the situation improves a lot going back a few tens of millimeters of focal. Vignette a little, the images flatten and a bit of chromatic aberration appears. I would say that it is a useful contraption because it allows you to take home some otherwise impossible image when you need a really long focal point, or to put yourself in your pocket when you only go out with a goal, thinking that you never know, maybe it could come in handy, and for what clutter ... For frequent use the pairing described above I do not think can give much satisfaction. On the other hand, for frequent use perhaps all multipliers are to be avoided...

Arnaldo83

sent on January 24, 2019

Pros: Good compatibility (so far it has worked with all my lenses, old and new, Canon and other brands), good quality, AF maintenance, value for money

Cons: "Only" 1, 4x (but you know when you buy it!), good grafts, but not perfect (sometimes there is a little "game", especially with heavy lenses)

Opinion: Bought used for little money, more than anything else to try it (I have no "series" lenses to multiply), I was pleasantly surprised. Tested on my old 30d with:-Canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6: Compatible, full read EXIF data, keeps AF on all points (with good reactivity); -Tamron 70-300mm F/4-5.6: Compatible, full read EXIF data, keeps AF on all points (better than the central), but slows down a lot and with little light often does not hook the subject (numerous "back and forth"); In manual instead it correctly maintains the focus confirmation. This lens at 300mm is already soft on its own, so it's definitely not the best possible choice to multiply, but that's it! -Seimar 500mm F/8 retroreflecting: M42 (screw) mount, with chip adapter; It maintains more or less unchanged its objectively a little poor quality; At the theoretical level keeps the confirmation of focus, but does not hook almost never (I guess because of poor sharpness or other); does not recognize the actual aperture, but "recognizes" the presence of the multiplier (with only the lens marks me "f/1.4", with also mounted the multiplier marks me "f/2.0"). Obviously here they are not made for each other, but they can coexist. -Zeiss 200mm f/2.8 Electric: M42 (screw) mount, with chip adapter; The quality does not drop in an appreciable way and it works very well the confirmation of focus (being a fully manual lens, of course there is no AF to maintain!); Here, this becomes a nice 280mm F/4! Also in this case, the machine recognizes the presence of the multiplier, also multiplying the minimum diaphragm detected. In Summary, for now this multiplier has adapted, maintaining substantially all the functionality, to all the "Accrocchi" that I tried to do. It doesn't turn a donkey into a thoroughbred, but let's say it's not the other way! Considering also the value for money, I gave a vote of 9.

Norellanna

sent on December 30, 2018

Pros: Price and compatibility

Cons: I too am for no

Opinion: I agree with the exposure of Carlo Alfonso, I use the Canon III but it is not always compatible with all the optics while this is and is not a little. Used on 7d Mark II keeps all MAF points while the Canon does not. I will perhaps not picky but very big differences compared with the Canon I do not know, there are but they are minimal. I could compare it also with Kenko 1.4 Pro DGX (not always compatible with all lenses) and with Canon II. Often hard to understand certain reviews, maybe they talk about it by hearsay.

There are 5 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX

Sperm whale

by Federico Pagliari
13 comments, 1092 views

HI RES 19.2 MP

Untitled Photo

by Fabrydf
6 comments, 1532 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Wren

by Davide Prina
4 comments, 1477 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Great spotted woodpecker (female)

by Ste Martini
9 comments, 1206 views

Appeared Silent

by DiegoMaffo93
6 comments, 448 views

HI RES 6.1 MP

Two generations in comparison

by Gabri86
9 comments, 1025 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Moon of November

by Matteo1976
4 comments, 1671 views

HI RES 5.9 MP

Great spotted woodpecker (female)

by Ste Martini
6 comments, 995 views

Siskin

by Ste Martini
3 comments, 931 views

Black rhinoceros

by Gabri86
4 comments, 1070 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Chiffchaff

by Davide Prina
2 comments, 918 views

HI RES 4.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Gabri86
4 comments, 893 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Heron with two spatulas

by Ernestospaziani
6 comments, 734 views

HI RES 16.2 MP

Big tit

by Ste Martini
1 comments, 714 views

I am a tough guy, said the hawk.

by Ste Martini
7 comments, 801 views

Untitled Photo

by Gabri86
2 comments, 854 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Verdone

by Ste Martini
0 comments, 855 views

Moose in Troms

by Federico Pagliari
1 comments, 646 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Sparow

by Tahajam
0 comments, 707 views

Codibugnol

by Andrea Casadei
0 comments, 375 views

"Tit"

by Davide Prina
3 comments, 821 views

HI RES 5.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Fabrydf
0 comments, 820 views

HI RES 8.0 MP

Reversal

by Andrea Casadei
2 comments, 499 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Grosbeak

by Ste Martini
2 comments, 695 views

Cormorant

by Vale_lc
0 comments, 516 views

Beccamoschino

by MickBanzai
2 comments, 889 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

The flirtatious

by Davide Prina
0 comments, 666 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Robin

by Andrea Casadei
0 comments, 440 views

Untitled Photo

by Fabrydf
0 comments, 964 views

The bush king

by Gabri86
7 comments, 881 views

Tit

by Ste Martini
0 comments, 662 views

Butterfly

by Vale_lc
0 comments, 454 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Untitled Photo

by Gabri86
2 comments, 650 views

Tortora

by Andrea Casadei
0 comments, 447 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Ash heron

by Andrea Casadei
0 comments, 361 views

HI RES 8.0 MP

Tortora

by Andrea Casadei
0 comments, 314 views

HI RES 9.4 MP

Blond corsair

by Desmopaolo
0 comments, 111 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Kenko » Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX

Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Kenko Teleplus 1.4x HD DGX