JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Fujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS is a tele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2013. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 578 €;
62 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 206000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Great lens for sharpness, weight and footprint if he had also had the barrel lock would have been perfect
Cons:The thing I didn't like is the fact that I didn't insert a lens block that allows you not to let the barrel out when you hold it over the shoulder , it's annoying to see it go out all the time and dust itself unnecessarily.
Opinion:Excellent lens for sharpness, weight and footprint. It has nothing to envy to targets of more famous and much more expensive brands. I took him to the mountains several times bringing home some great photos without breaking my back. The thing I find very annoying though is the barrel that comes out as soon as you put the lens in the right.
Pros:Construction quality, clutter and weights, stabilized
Cons:Endless diaphragms, barrel that extends when walking
Opinion:I have had the optics for more than a year and I have pulled it for mountain trails, I must say that in fuji the zoom canvases are not many, if you choose this lens is because you want to stay "in the middle" as quality between 50-230 and 50-140. At least, I made this reasoning, having to take it through the mountains in my treks, the 50-140 turned out to be too heavy and cumbersome, and I did not trust the XC series for the 50-230, so I opted for this lens. I have to say that I am satisfied, it is clear Q.B., it has a focal excursion that goes very well for landscapes, the brightness is not record, but the stabilization compensates for the more closed diaphragm. The bokeh is not bad, obviously less marked than an ultra-bright fixed optics. In short, maybe not suitable for portraits but more devoted to landscape and generalist photography. The diaphragms' diaphragms are the best clutched Fuji optics I own, but it's endless, diaphragms on the barrel are not indicated, and I don't like it very much. The zoom dial is hard enough, but the barrel comes out if we carry the car hanging around our necks and walk. There's no focal block. Rating 8.5
Opinion:Good goal, well built and with a blurry 200mm that I still miss (despite then taking the 50140). If together with the xf1855 had been WR I think I would have avoided buying f2.8 zooms, I would have been happier (given the weight and compactness) and would have saved a lot of money. Unfortunately after a year of use the internal lenses were full of dust, visible in the f11 shots, so I sold it to fund WR lenses. Unwieldy and uncomfortable lampshade.
Opinion:Goal from value for money to the top. It does not suffer from the lack of a focal 2.8, thanks to the stabilization and wonderful high iso yield of my xt2. What to say, it satisfies me fully. Before buying it I had thought to take the 50-140 (I come from a Canon L-series kit); I don't regret it at all. Vote 10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Opinion:Really very interesting this zoom Fuji 55-200 approaches the sharpness yield at 50-140 but weighs almost put it as well as the costs many more steps. Pro Sharpness great the Ice Stabilizer also present tires great feeling. Bokeh perhaps better than on the 50-140 of course always compared with the same diaphragms. Against Ghiera zooms too hard, AF very precise but compared with the slow 50-140. Internal powder formation lacks WR seals for dust and moisture. Pump a lot of air inside optical. The mechanics leave a lot to want far from the 50-140 optics this remains superior even as overall yield but very little. After trying almost all Fuji zoom at the quality level I would say the best Fuji zoom at medium high level. All in all I consider this optical zoom 55-200 among the best successful Fuji great ratio yield and cost.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
