JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2024. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 3600 €;

1 users have given it an average vote of 10.0 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.3 - 12.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	11
Lenses/Groups	18 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	0.49-0.68 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.30x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1115 g
Dimensions	89 x 199 mm
Buy
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Nicoli Giuliano

sent on January 05, 2025

Pros: Weight, AF speed, stabilizer, definition, silent dual nano usm motors, multipliable with Extender

Cons: Price

Opinion: My review is given by the comparison with its predecessor EF III, which I own, and with the 70 200 RF first version. First of all, it should be noted that the length of the lens is the same as the EF version, longer than the RF first closed version by 5 cm, but if it opens at 200 the first version becomes almost 2 cm longer so I wouldn't take the length factor too seriously. The sharpness is better than both previous versions, as well as the colors although not too much. The focusing distance has definitely improved, this goes from 49cm to 68cm from 70 to 200 mm while the first RF version stops at 70cm from 70 to 200mm, while the EF version is 1.2 meters from 70 to 200mm. The filters are larger, so they will cost more, if you use them at all! However, the difference is 82mm of the Z to 77mm of the other 2. The reproduction ratio is slightly wider, 0.30 for the Z, 0.23 for the RF and 0.21 for the EF. The dual Nano USM motors make it quieter than previous versions. Chapter multipliers, if on the EF version they could be mounted, and mounted the result was good, on the first RF version they cannot be mounted and this was the reason why I did not buy that lens. Mounted the Extenders on the Z the result is very good, with the 1x4 it goes well, it does not lose either in speed or in lock or sharpness, with the 2X it has some problems focusing on nearby subjects, as the EF version had even if, in my opinion, a little less. For the rest it does its job very well. The customizable dial and selection buttons, present on the previous RF version and not on the EF version, are beautiful. The weight is great, 40g more than the RF version and about 330g less than the EF version, and over the long run of use you can feel them all. Video issue, there is none for anyone, it embarrassingly outclasses both other versions, the aperture ring makes focus breathing practically null and for those who make videos like me it is really a masterstroke. Summing up, the fact that it costs more is justified, of course... too much more... There would be room for improvement but I don't build goals so I'll stop here. Conclusion, if I have to be honest I am extremely satisfied to have bought this lens because it is certainly better than the other 2 for several reasons, the AF attachment from smooth is fantastic reminds me of the 100-500. The stabilization is excellent, but the other versions are not bad either, perhaps this one has that something extra since tasted on panning it made much better than the others. I hope I haven't forgotten anything and have given a review that can help others!!

Alberto Tirri

sent on November 28, 2024

Pros: Definition, bokeh, focusing distance, responsiveness, stabilization.

Cons: Size, especially length and, first of all, the price.

Opinion: I come from the "short" version, given in exchange for this one and I will try to highlight, in particular, the differences, although this is a first evaluation, always susceptible to ongoing updates. Let's start with the dimensions: the weight is only 40 grams exceeding the other version, while, as already known, the length is about 20 cm, if it had been less it would certainly have been better, but, probably, it is the counterpart of the non-extensibility. The optical scheme is more complex and refined than the other 70-200, thanks to the presence of a few more optical elements, but I must say that a further increase in incisiveness, understood as resolution, is perceptible. The colors are excellent, which seem to me to veer slightly towards warm tones. At the top of the quality level are stabilization, operating speed (given by the 2 nano-usm motors) and silence, while the phenomenon of breathing focus is almost completely absent, it is no coincidence that we are talking about a hybrid lens, designed for videos, as well as for photographic use. Important and significant is the reduction of the minimum focusing distance, which allows close-up shots, not previously possible, with the possibility of isolating the framed subject more from the background (among other things, I benefited from it in the first test photos, such as the one I published below). One of the most appreciable qualities is the soft and "pasty" nature of the blur, thanks to the 11-blade diaphragm. In fact, the transition of the planes is gradual and "gentle", returning a very pleasant bokeh: the detachment, more than consistent, is never brutal. Which one to choose between the two lenses? If portability is the sine qua non, certainly the first version, which, not surprisingly, remains in the price list. If you want a "little more", compared to the already excellent performance of the other, perhaps winking more often also at the use in the video field, certainly this new RF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM Z. The most sore point, which Canon should absolutely improve, is the price!

Photos taken with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

Din

by Alberto Tirri
20 comments, 350 views

HI RES 44.8 MP

Colors in the cold

by Alberto Tirri
25 comments, 673 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Wren

by Siro
27 comments, 564 views

The dive of the Peppola

by Antonio Damanti
11 comments, 239 views

HI RES 6.4 MP

A touch of life....

by Alberto Tirri
8 comments, 386 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Overture Iuliana 05

by Jacopograziano
2 comments, 126 views

HI RES 37.3 MP

Overture Iuliana 01

by Jacopograziano
0 comments, 110 views

HI RES 47.8 MP

Overture Iuliana 04

by Jacopograziano
2 comments, 105 views

HI RES 34.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Overture Iuliana 02

by Jacopograziano
0 comments, 82 views

HI RES 38.2 MP

Overture Iuliana 03

by Jacopograziano
0 comments, 82 views

HI RES 35.1 MP

Chiffchaff

by Antonio Damanti
0 comments, 128 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z