JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM is a superzoom lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1000 €;

31 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	24-240 mm
Angle of view	84 - 10.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-6.3
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	21 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	0.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.26x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	750 g
Dimensions	80 x 122 mm
Buy
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Serbat60

sent on February 15, 2025

Pros: Focal range. By now it can be found used at more than affordable prices

Cons: Not comparable to an L-series

Opinion: As a former owner of an RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, I picked up this 24-240 with the knowledge that if I wasn't happy with it, I would sell it and turn my attention to another L-series. The difference with the L series is immediately felt and it is not necessarily negative: lighter, longer travel and the awareness of having an all-rounder that costs quite little, makes me feel calmer. I use it for trips and sporting events and the rendering of the photos taken, being an amateur, fully satisfy me! I believe that one should always choose a lens based on one's skills and expertise. For this reason, personally, I am very very satisfied and I highly recommend it!

Marcellino Massimo

sent on January 06, 2025

Pros: For me everything.

Cons: Plasticky appearance.

Opinion: I've been using this lens on the Canon R6 mk2 for exactly one year and it's also the only one I have, so I can't make comparisons but it fully meets my needs as an amateur photographer. I bought it used from my trusted shopkeeper, in fact as new, with lens hood and still under warranty. It has an important focal range and I thought worse as a result, but definitely good. The weight is low. I inserted the correction in the machine and even at 24 mm the distortion is more than contained. The colors it returns are beautiful, I did not detect optical anomalies, used at night on a monopod with shooting at 25800 iso, magnificent. I use it a lot in the video field and it is smooth, excellent stabilization, speed of focus. I highly recommend it.

Mattiap78

sent on November 13, 2022

Pros: Good definition at almost all focal lengths, fast and accurate autofocus, relatively light weight, large focal range, excellent image stabilization.

Cons: Medium quality construction, not tropicalized, lacks hood, lacks manual fire selector, distortion at 24mm, high price.

Opinion: Economic lens with an important price: you can see almost immediately that it is built in economy, starting with the packaging of the box, but with the excuse that Canon prevents third-party manufacturers from producing lenses with the new mount, it allows it to offer medium quality products at exaggerated prices. Such a lens should be sold at 600 euros in my opinion, not 1000. The construction consists of a medium-low quality plastic that seems to be easily ruined, but we will see this with the use. For the use that is intended this lens, that is all-rounder and for travel, it would not be bad if it had been tropicalized. The switch to select manual fire is missing, although this is a marginal problem as far as I'm concerned. For the 1000 euros paid, you could also make a small effort to include the hood (it costs 15 euros of competition, Canon certainly less), useful accessory not only to reduce reflections, but also to protect the front lens. But it's not all a con to this lens: the relatively light weight and the large focal range will make it a faithful companion for mountain hikes and travel. The definition is very good at short and medium focal lengths, while towards the upper limit there is a slight loss of detail, but nothing serious. The autofocus is fast, precise and quiet. The optical stabilizer works in symbiosis with the sensor (for camera bodies equipped with a stabilized sensor) and is really very effective. The zoom dial has no backlash, and is pleasant to use; Maybe a bit too hard, but not a problem, and makes the zoom lock switch superfluous. Convenient is the freely assignable multifunction ring, which becomes the fire control if necessary (there is the selector to choose the control, but not the one to choose the manual fire). It should be noted that if you shoot in RAW, it is mandatory to correct the distortion in post production to 24mm (in jpeg the camera already does it automatically), otherwise you can admire the black border of the lens on the four corners. This is another potential lens defect, because the correction leads to a small loss of detail on the edges. In conclusion, the lens will certainly give me satisfaction, but at a somewhat expensive price for construction.

Daniele Ruggeri D2

sent on September 26, 2022

Pros: Focal range, dimensions/weight

Cons: Yield at the edges, 24mm so-so, 240mm a little soft, not very bright and cost.

Opinion: It is a fairly compact size lens for a 10x. The yield in the center is good, at 24 it loses a lot at the edges: deactivating the lens profile on camera raw you notice a lens wider than 24, a little fisheye, which is stretched and cropped by the software correction to obtain the final result that we are used to seeing. Between 50 and 100mm is pretty good; between 100 and 150mm gives its best, from here on it starts to drop until it becomes a little soft at 240mm. From my impressions in the wide focal lengths this super-zoom is poorer than the various 24-70/105 but at 70 and 105 beats them being halfway through its excursion. The convenience, however, is that compared to them the 24-240 reaches much further .. it's like having a normal zoom and a tele-zoom combined. I did some tests comparing with the 24-75 of the Panasonic lx100 (which I use on a trip) and beats it despite the greater focal range. Obviously it helps the FF sensor of the R against the 4/3 of the compact. Being a fairly dark zoom in the evening outings with the tip and shoot you go up a lot of ISO: I recommend for this to bring a tripod or flank a bright fixed. In my opinion it is the ideal optics for travel / trip because being able to shoot between 24 and 240 without changing lens is priceless! Being a handyman I also tried it in portrait and at the focal canvases manages to blur despite the dark diaphragm isolating the model. I am combining it with my set of fixed for travel use, reducing the use of the compact to the bare minimum, to take more advantage of the EOS R.

Angelillo

sent on February 22, 2022

Pros: Versatility, more than discreet optical yield discreet at all focal lengths, surprising for a super zoom

Cons: Reduced brightness, lack of hood, mandatory digital correction at 24mm, at 240 mm lower yield than shorter focal lengths, lack of any form of tropicalization

Opinion: Taken for a landscaping workshop with the intention of reselling it as soon as I could take the RF 24-105 L, unavailable at the time. The problem is that compared with other lenses (EF 35mm f2 IS, EF 50mm f1.8, EF 70-200 F4 IS L) and with the same RF 24-105mm F4 L on Canon EOS R, well the RF 24-240mm is not bad at all: it managed to undermine my prejudices about super zooms. Certainly it does not have the same performance as fixed focal lengths, certainly zooms with lower excursion are better, but the differences are no longer as macroscopic as they used to be. Even compared to the RF 24-105 mm F4 L the differences are not huge. The resolution in the center is more than decent on all focal lengths, at the extremes of the range (24 and 240 mm) are the edges to suffer a little. In the central focal lengths the situation is not bad, so for example at 105 mm at TA I can not say that the RF 24-105 mm L is better, indeed: at 105mm the 24-105mm is at the upper limit (which in itself has a lower yield than the shorter focal lengths, at least on my specimen), while the 24-240 is in an intermediate area of its range, where he gives the best of himself. Even when compared to the EF 70-200mm F4 IS L the differences, in the equivalent focal lengths, are not evident except when comparing the images at 100% or 200%, with the advantage of the edges for the EF 70-200 F4 IS L. For design choice it is necessary to use the digital correction of geometric distortion (otherwise enormous) and 24mm vignetting, a choice that obviously penalizes the yield at the edges. The color rendering is good, as well as the contrast. Effective stabilizer. The prerogative of having in a single lens a wide range of focal lengths, with a weight contained in 750g is a huge advantage, especially when traveling or hiking; In such situations, often not having to change the optics is also an advantage, limiting the dirt that ends up on the sensor. In this regard, the lack of any form of tropicalization is an important limitation. The biggest problem I've encountered is the limited brightness that pushes to use high ISO (especially at longer focal lengths, f 6.3 at 240mm!), and this reduces the image quality in low light more than the resolution limits. For the purchase price (1000 and more €) the lack of the hood is scandalous. Moral: not only did I not resell it, but very often it takes the place in the outputs of the RF 24-105mm F4 L.

There are 2 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

What a view!

by -zeppo-
63 comments, 6148 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
50 comments, 2684 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
36 comments, 2105 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Bernina-White Lake,Black Lake

by Giulietta Cazzaro
63 comments, 857 views

HI RES 22.9 MP

Candle lace

by Vincenzo Sciumè
28 comments, 959 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Lessinia

by Roberto Nalini
21 comments, 2330 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
27 comments, 4490 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Towards the church

by Roberto Nalini
24 comments, 1782 views

HI RES 9.0 MP

Seligman

by -zeppo-
27 comments, 1821 views

HI RES 5.9 MP

Bernina

by Giulietta Cazzaro
75 comments, 1499 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Mussomeli Department (CL)

by Vincenzo Sciumè
26 comments, 2019 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

" WE COULD HAVE DRUNK MORE "

by Gazebo
58 comments, 2071 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

With the Tenth BEER you only see the slippers....

by Gazebo
57 comments, 1710 views

HI RES 9.2 MP

The Florentine beauty

by Gazebo
65 comments, 1905 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Monument Valley at dawn

by -zeppo-
18 comments, 1344 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Moments of professional unity

by Gazebo
59 comments, 1430 views

HI RES 14.4 MP

"THE PLEASURE OF BEING AND PARTICIPATING"

by Gazebo
50 comments, 2152 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Drink by+++++++

by Gazebo
49 comments, 1590 views

HI RES 13.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
22 comments, 829 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

This one I'm coming to pick you up with my SAME tractor

by Gazebo
38 comments, 1025 views

HI RES 12.7 MP

I'll bring the wine!

by Gazebo
53 comments, 892 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Bricipilla absorbed in his projects

by Gazebo
69 comments, 1479 views

HI RES 16.1 MP

How to interpret Moira's answer

by Gazebo
53 comments, 1611 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

There are many Flowers left But fewer and fewer Children

by Gazebo
45 comments, 343 views

HI RES 36.4 MP

Sunset in the East

by Gazebo
39 comments, 846 views

Collegiate church of San Giovanni Battista in Castel San Giovanni

by Gazebo
39 comments, 1062 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Vigevano 2025 - The covered road

by Ivan Catellani
40 comments, 560 views

Lemonade

by Gazebo
37 comments, 1352 views

Engraved in focus.

by Vincenzo Sciumè
24 comments, 1180 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Founded in Castrezzato (BS) on 24-03-2024

by Gazebo
48 comments, 1106 views

HI RES 15.7 MP

Bricipilla's dive

by Gazebo
69 comments, 1226 views

HI RES 13.1 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Photogenic? The answer is yours

by Galiano59
15 comments, 2323 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Holy Christmas Should Improve All People

by Gazebo
43 comments, 454 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

Italic orchid

by Vincenzo Sciumè
25 comments, 1321 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Morning hatches in Pellestrina VE

by Roberto Nalini
10 comments, 1936 views

HI RES 18.7 MP

"Little Red Riding Hood"

by Ruzza Stefano
46 comments, 1690 views

Santa Maria dello Spasmo

by Daniele Ruggeri D2
6 comments, 2593 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM