JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EOS R5 Mark II : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is a mirrorless camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 45 megapixels manufactured from 2024. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 102400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 30 FPS x 93 RAW, 200 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 4349 €;

36 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10

Sensor
Format	Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	45 megapixel (pixel pitch 4.39 μm)
Sensor type	CMOS BSI Stacked (sensor readout: 1/160)
ISO sensitivities	50 - 102400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/32000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Canon RF (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	30 FPS x 93 RAW, 200 JPEG
Pre-Burst	Yes
Live View	Yes
Video mode	8K (7680x4320p) @ 60 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	No
Focus Stacking	Yes, in-camera
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.2″, 2.1 Mdots, 1024 x 680 pixels, fully articulating
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 0.76x
Viewfinder resolution	1600 x 1200 px
Flash	No
Storage	CFExpress Type B
Storage, Slot 2	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Canon LP-E6P, 17.20 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	746 g
Dimensions	138 x 101 x 93 mm
Buy
Canon EOS R5 Mark II, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Tnekralc

sent on November 15, 2025

Pros: High image quality, versatility, rich functions, ergonomics, energy consumption

Cons: Some limited criticalities with the autofocus, perhaps rather complex menu due to the amount of options, otherwise I found no faults

Opinion: Purchased a few months ago, it represented for me the entry into the modern mirrorless world. Taking into account that I only use it to take photos, so far it has met expectations very much. Robust enough to fall out of my hand without having even a scratch, it is a concentrate of technologies, so much so that in some contexts I have not yet found the best possible combination to make the most of its characteristics. The quality performance is very good, beyond the resolution itself I find that dynamics and colors are excellent, with very well workable files produced. The autonomy is good, with the battery grip you can largely exceed a thousand shots. Excellent autofocus with all the lenses I own, only in some very critical junctures does it show limits. I don't use focus with the eye as I don't think it's accurate enough, at least in my case, I prefer to do without it. Good ergonomics, I had to become familiar with the new layout of the controls but the adaptation was very quick and now I find it particularly apt as a solution. The electronic viewfinder is much appreciated, which does not make you regret the optical version of the reflex cameras excessively, the display is comfortable and versatile. Honestly, so far I think I have exploited only a small part of the potential of the car but after all it is very difficult to use all the functions, unless you want to do it only for the purpose of real technical testing. In the end, the mix offered is very satisfactory and I judge the cost of the camera to be well correlated with the features offered.

Jacopograziano

sent on October 27, 2025

Pros: Sensor, functionality, versatility, viewfinder, comfort

Cons: Overheating, materials, expensive

Opinion: Tested by Canon Italia for a few days together with the 70-200 pcs, the historic Canon 5 series that stands as the definitive all-rounder in the camera market. Compared to the first generation, finally here we have a competitive camera in terms of functionality and not a run-up to the mirrorless world. Rolling shutter and other issues of the first version have been fixed. We find ourselves in the hands of a definitive expense that should "pay for itself" over the years between photography and video. The autofocus is nothing short of perfect, completely customizable in areas and modes, an AF that I appreciated more than Sony's operation (less customizable). Excellent sensor, synergy with the lenses known canon, the colors are the right ones and everything works wonderfully. And yet it warms. it heats up a mess, it heats up so much that, during a 4-hour shooting, with short bursts of PHOTOS, not videos, with the fan handle they provided me, it overheated. It had never happened to me to overheat a car while taking photos, a very strange situation that left a great bitter taste in my mouth. The body is produced with a different plastic from Sony or Nikon which gives it a "toy" feeling and seems to cost much less, having said that the buttons and the grip are perfect and well positioned. It left me with a huge doubt, for what it costs I expected the perfect photo and video camera, burst and mpx, robust and transportable, if it freezes while I work but everything collapses (specifically they didn't tell me it was a pre-production model, it was a retail). Splendid viewfinder even if with me the eye tracking has never worked, how sad.

Valter Degni

sent on September 23, 2025

Pros: autofocus, ergonomics, file quality, batt duration (below I'll explain why...), pre-shooting, the third thumb ring (I put the exposure there)

Cons: only one slot, Signa and Tamron not compatible (nice .... (a)

Opinion: I premise no video and exclusive use for nature photography, perennially merged with the Canon 600 f4 II. The battery life has monstrously increased because I never use the screen (which I don't use by definition) and above all because the viewfinder turns off as I detach the eye from the eyepiece, we are about 2000 shots and more (bursts). The quality of the file is superlative and in case of noise, Topaz De Noise digests it spectacularly. Ergonomics are very personal, and for me they are perfect, neither big nor small. The AF with the eye never used because it locks on to the subject's eye so well that it is not needed. The stabilization with medium-short focal lengths works very well, with the 600 I can't say because it works very well on its own. Speaking of buffers, with the right board (V60) it's a rocket. As mentioned they have added (compared to my previous 7DmkII) a third "thumb" dial that can be set, very useful for balancing the exposure instead of the key/front dial combination.

Vico352

sent on June 29, 2025

Pros: Lightness, image quality

Cons: autofocus, in my case very disappointing, perceived quality, ergonomics that can be improved

Opinion: I use both Canon and Nikon and before making a final choice I chose the way to experiment and compare the 2 systems personally. I have owned the R5 mark II for about 2 months sign updated to the latest version, main use of birds with a lens of 200 800 that I also use with the R7. The autofocus in my case is particularly ineffective especially on birds in flight, a situation in which the R5 mark II should be the excellence, I must say that with the R7 the results are much superior which is saying something. I also own a Nikon Z8 with several FX and Z lenses including the Z 180 600, consideration; weight aside, the results with Nikon are much more effective. In some cases I also came out with the two systems, so the same conditions to be clear, the same actions and predictable movements of the subject (feeding the chicks with actions to and from the nest) At 20 frames according to most of the time the Canon after 4 shots loses focus and goes into the background, the Nikon Z8 when it locks on and you are good at keeping the subject in the frame hardly lets it go. With Canon I tried all possible autofocus settings (basic: servo/animal eye detection/tracking) with very disappointing results. I thought it could be the lens (unfortunately I don't have any other telephoto lenses to compare at the moment) but why if I use it with the R7 I get much better results ?? Basically for me the R5 Mark II is a disappointment, I hope I can change my mind because in terms of weight the advantages are evident even if in terms of robustness and ergonomics the sensations when I use Nikon are more gratifying.

Mattia Campos

sent on November 16, 2024

Pros: Image quality. Prompt and precise autofocus. Beautiful and realistic viewfinder that remains quite pleasant even in bad light. Versatility, it can do pretty much anything well. Very very beautiful colors, even the JPEGs are much better than R5 old and R6ii. The only big regret concerns as usual the "form factor", i.e. body design and components at "Entry Level" levels. Nikon Z8, Sony A7r5 /A1 are in a much higher range...

Cons: It's not a flagship... Some components are too cheap. Usable only with the new battery, which is also not very long-lasting (about 700 shots). Overheating problems during intense use that knock it out after 20 minutes (coincidentally officially mentioned among the things to be solved with the release of the latest firmware) The Eye control AF system, which on paper could have made a huge difference, a revolution, is actually unusable, pure marketing .. Mediocre image stabilization as on R7, to be reviewed and fixed. the R6II does better. Exclusive and increasingly expensive lens park, Tamron and Sigma are missing which would work very well and would give a lot of life to the RF system.

Opinion: The R5 Mark II puts things back in place in the hierarchy of Canon's mirrorless cameras, re-establishing distances compared to lower-end models. From the very first moment of use, you can feel that the R5 II has reached a higher level of maturity. It is a point-in-point camera, with a solid autofocus and finally a good viewfinder, sober and with the right brightness, which remains smooth and beautiful even in low light. The new 45mpx stacked sensor has significantly reduced the problem of rolling shutter, which now occurs only in the most complex situations. In addition, compared to the old R5, the colors have improved and the unpleasant magenta tendency that characterized the old sensor in certain scenes has also disappeared. Regarding the ISO tightness of the new sensor, the question is very simple, it all depends, as almost always happens, on the light !!! If the scene or if the subject are sufficiently illuminated, the file is very valid (and the JPEG is ready to use) even at 25600 ISO. Conversely, if the light is not sufficient, the file is affected. Up to 6400 ISO no problem (and we would miss it) the quality is excellent, at 12800 ISO you start to notice the noise but the quality remains good, at 25600 ISO instead you notice a significant deterioration, it remains usable for documentary purposes. However, when the light drops (a lot), you notice a certain difference in general compared to the files derived from the 24mpx sensors, for example of the R6 and R3. The noise is more visible and the contours tend to fade and become kneaded. The R5ii isn't exactly lightning fast when it comes to alertness and wake-up. The sensitivity of the shutter button and the responsiveness of the joystick are not great, and the AF ON button used as a back button focus is a bit too skimpy and unpleasant and is positioned next to the joystick instead of above. In these respects the R5 II is still quite far from the Sony A1 and A9iii and also from the Nikon Z8 and Z9. I like the camera that supports me and allows me to shoot almost with my thoughts... I observe something that strikes me, I don't have time to bring my finger to the shutter button, I touch it, and I bring home the shot .. The R5 II does not allow me to do this, the Sony does... We'll see what the R1 can do. The R5II, however, is certainly a beautiful camera, it allows you to do practically everything and well, even in sports and nature as long as it is used with bright and high-performance lenses and consequently very expensive. However, it gives me the impression of being a camera more suited to static or semi-static photography, rather than action. In reality it does great everywhere, but it is the experience of use, and the pleasure, that make the difference and that for me are the fundamental thing. And personally I didn't feel entirely at ease. The impression is that of having a body for the hands a little too plastic, only mid-range, with an ergonomics that leaves a little to be desired, keys and dials do not fall like a glove for my hands (ditto with R5old R6ii R7) the side rubber to protect the grips is a long and single piece stuck with a "spit" that gives the impression of jumping away from one moment to the next. And finally there are the 45mpx, which I don't need at all in sports and photographic hunting and I'm just a hindrance when the light goes down (ditto the 50 of the A1 and the 45 of the Z8/9) disfiguring the image quality. By the way, I don't care about 300% surgical vision on the monitor, and if I really wanted to enjoy the file and crop like a desperate person I would take the GFX100 II whose file is from another planet and the optics park costs less than the RF one.

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Starlings

by PannaeFragola
48 comments, 3802 views [editors pick]

Fights on the lake

by Alessandro Beconi
58 comments, 3244 views [editors pick]

Water rail

by Daniele_Occhiato
42 comments, 2748 views [editors pick]

Small lynxes

by Marco50
73 comments, 2919 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Pheasant ♂

by Marco50
74 comments, 2312 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

The sparrowhawk's salute

by Marco50
79 comments, 2220 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

PARDINA LYNX

by Marco50
66 comments, 3155 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Lynx Baby

by Marco50
60 comments, 2206 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Games

by Marco50
51 comments, 2026 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Golden Eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
46 comments, 3182 views

Ermine

by Emilio63
37 comments, 1677 views

Golden Eagle Italian Alps

by Emilio63
37 comments, 3927 views

Iberian Lynx

by Marco50
60 comments, 2031 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

The green ? woodpecker bath

by Marco50
73 comments, 1116 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Goshawk

by Emilio63
38 comments, 2864 views

Owl

by PannaeFragola
28 comments, 1420 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Weaning Hoopoe

by Marco50
58 comments, 1134 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Garganey

by PannaeFragola
34 comments, 1734 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Kestrel

by PannaeFragola
38 comments, 1460 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Unexpected Griffin

by Marco50
63 comments, 1788 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The attack

by Alessandro Beconi
51 comments, 1966 views

Terrible Brothers

by Davide Fusco
36 comments, 2035 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Roar 2024

by Emilio63
23 comments, 2333 views

Ermine

by Emilio63
22 comments, 1369 views

Kestrel

by Daniele_Occhiato
31 comments, 1039 views

Flaps of wings

by Maurizio Lanini
44 comments, 2163 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Air SHOW tricolor arrows

by Marco50
47 comments, 1107 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Sparrowhawk ?

by Marco50
63 comments, 1614 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Discussion

by Marco50
48 comments, 1006 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Owl

by PannaeFragola
30 comments, 1352 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Yaffle ?

by Marco50
42 comments, 789 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Exchange of ideas between starlings

by Marco50
50 comments, 1123 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

ON OFF

by Marco50
60 comments, 738 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Bonelli's Eagle (Aquila fasciata)

by Marco50
55 comments, 1457 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Golden eagle

by Marco50
55 comments, 1456 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Towards Lofoten

by Marco50
49 comments, 1897 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Jay

by Marco50
44 comments, 2181 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Canon » Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5 Mark II