JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 20-35mm f/2.8L is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1989 to 1996 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is €;
5 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Very compact, excellent construction (fluid and precise dials, aluminum barrel), optical performance of the L Series AF accurately and quickly, and very good resistance to flare ghost to be a bright and ultrawide zoom.
Cons:Minimum focusing distance a bit 'largest of the newer models, AC wide open, hard to find used vehicle. Lack of distortion correction profile is in cameras that DPP.
Opinion:I bought this lens with more than 20 years behind him, well kept, with no significant signs of use and complete with hard case (fake) leather Original Canon lens hood. RNLA building is fantastic, the aluminum barrel and dials give a feeling of control and stability unmatched. And it is small: the size are the same as a recent 17/40 f4, and is much more compact and light of recent UW zoom f / 2.8 products Canon.rnLa sharpness and yield in general is good, but above all, homogeneous on throughout the frame, at all focusing and aperture. No surprises, all right in any unique configurazione.rnGli notes are: chromatic aberration worthy of that period goals, and distortion at the minimum focal length a bit 'emphasized, however, problems solved without difficulty PP (even if the Canon software is free profiles of this lens, so you have to rely on other instruments) .rnFlare and ghost show up only under extreme conditions: full aperture and sun all9, the frame end, for the rest performs better than several UWA f / 2.8 that have succeduto.rnLa quote MMT is uncertain: there are not many specimens for sale, nor is much in demand, so you can do a good deal, provided you find a copy in a decent seal, given the average age of a specimen produced between 89 and '95. However under 500 € for a copy in good condizioni.rnrnCanon no longer producing spare parts or perform any kind of assistance but, given the cost of the lens itself and the average cost of a repair, the problem is relativob: whether it it can repair or that you should throw, which means hundreds of euro. On ebay it is easy to find spare parts, anyway.
Pros:Very sharp, metal building exceptional, compact, fast autofocus although it uses the old scheme arc.
Cons:Chromatic aberration rather high, ghosting, vignetting at F 2.8 out of full frame.rndistorsione evident at 20 mm.rnNon there are replacement parts, so that, once you break something, you stick to the tram ...
Opinion:I own this lens for a month, but, however small it is my technique, I can say I have pointed out quite clearly the merits and difetti.rnLo use on full frame Canon 6d. In a review of Pine DiCaprio is considered lower than both the 17-35 f2, 8 that the 16-35 f2, 8. But we are talking about a review of the 2004.rnNonostante this, I decided to buy it and found it to 400 euro .. The specimen shows signs of wear, but better than I expected, given that, at a minimum, 18 years old on spalle.rnConfrontato with the 17/40 F4 I have, I must say that at the level of contrast and sharpness you do not notice the differenza.Anzi, from F4 onwards it is also a bit more detail. rnAutofocus fast, although it is not ultrasonic. It 'sa bit noisy, but it sounds to me piace.rnDa a feeling of enormous strength when you pick it up, being all metal. rnPurtroppo, using Photoshop DC, does not appear among the objectives for which it is provided for the correction of chromatic aberration and distorsione.rnLa sore point is its aberration chromeica that appears when you take pictures in notturna.Il 17-40 suffers much less, but God forbid ... rnPiuttosto visible vignetting at F2, 8 on full frame, the rest fairly correctable in post - ghost in produzione.rnEffetto backlight. compared with the 17-40, the latter widely winner emerges. rn
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.