Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

The Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1987 to 1992 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price was 350 €;

41 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	35-70 mm
Angle of view	63.5 - 34.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	15 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	0.60 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Zoom type	Push-pull, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	In-camera AF motor
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	Yes
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	675 g
Dimensions	71 x 94 mm
Buy
Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Filippo Trevisan

sent on 13 Febbraio 2026

Pros: Color rendering, sharpness, bokeh

Cons: Slow AF, limited focal length (especially on the wide-angle side)

Opinion: Optics that I literally loved on FF. Used mainly on D800E (so 36 mpx) and gave me wonderful shots: faithful and rich colors; very very nice bokeh. For the price (if you find a healthy specimen) it is a must have. I, personally, have used it a lot. The only note (but it is an outdated lens...) is the slowness of the af...

Pucci Mirti della Valle

sent on 18 Novembre 2024

Pros: Sharpness already from F2.8, cost of used today really inviting, saturated but not "distorted" colors, light and excellently built, internal zoom

Cons: Many specimens lose treatment and create halos (you have to be very lucky in choosing the specimen"

Opinion: I got this NOS lens at a very low price a year ago, today I can spend a few words. I use it in every one of my outings, absolutely everything is done with it; From portraits to landscapes, from street to life style, for me it is the lens that absolutely must always be in the backpack, I use it with FX sensor. It has wonderful detail, always sharp even at TA and I have never encountered any aberrations under any circumstances. It is made of metal but curiously it weighs very little, having also the internal zoom it is a gem "THAT CAN BE DEFINED AS NO LAUGHING MATTER" (Cit. Dogui-Yuppies). It has a very mellow blur which makes it great in portraits as well. Very vivid and saturated colors but absolutely not distorted. You have to get used to the pump mechanism, for the younger or less practical it could be a hassle but after an hour you get used to it. For this characteristic this lens was also called "the vacuum cleaner", but I honestly leave the legend to the storytellers, never had any problem. Many specimens lose the coating to the lenses making the lens unusable (not in my case) so be careful when choosing. Prices are very low today and it is in my opinion a definitive lens, remember that it is 2.8 on the entire focal length, therefore a PRO. I highly recommend it, also because then that you try there it is absolutely impossible not to always have it behind. It doesn't suffer from spinning with its lens hood, without I don't know because I've never taken it off.

Pietro Bazzana

sent on 01 Marzo 2022

Pros: Colors, construction, weight

Cons: suffers parasitic light, sharpness at the edges

Opinion: I highly recommend everyone to try this lens at least once given the charm of having to shoot again by manually managing the focus except when you have a camera body with af engine. It is recommended to always carry the hood with you as it suffers enough from parasitic lights. It loses sharpness at the edges. Low weight even if made of metal

Ernestospaziani

sent on 01 Febbraio 2022

Pros: SMALL AND COMPACT WITH 62 FILTERS THAT IT SHARES WITH 20 2.8 AND WITH THE 60 2.8 MICRO AND WITH THE 28-105 3.5-4 FRANK IN EXECUTION AND WITH THE RIGHT FOCAL COLOR AND BLURRED ILLUSTRATION

Cons: BACKLIGHT BUT RESOLVES FOR 80% WITH THE HOOD

Opinion: SOLID OPTICS BUILT VERY WELL PITY THAT THERE ARE MANY COPIES WITH THE CENTRAL DOUBLE OBFUSCATED WITH DETACHMENT OF THE BALM I HIGHLY RECOMMEND I HAD MANY COPIES EVEN THE FIRST I USED IT WITH BLOCKED APERTURE BUT ALREADY IT WAS VERY SATISFACTORY THEN WITH A WORK WORTHY OF THE FRANCHESTIN FROM TWO WE MADE A PERFECT ONE REPLACING THE CENTRAL DOUBLET THAT WAS BLURRED .... THEN SOLD AND BOUGHT BACK... I HOPE IT IS NOW FINAL....

Alle Power

sent on 20 Novembre 2019

Pros: Colors, f2.8 to all focal points, robustness/solidity, possibility of transformation into lens "macro" to 35mm, flare.

Cons: Construction defects, sharpness at the edges especially at TA, flare, front lens that rotates in the maf.

Opinion: Slow that networkse images with the most pasty and less contrasted colors, tending to the heat (very pleasant in some cases). The use of circular polarizing filters is not prohibited, they simply need to be recalibrated when moving the maf, especially when the subject's distance from one maf and the next varies greatly. My specimen (non-D version) was prone to lens opacity, diaphragms > 4 the thing was not noticed, but at 2.8 it almost seemed to have a mattifying mask on the rest of the photo that also dampened the colors as well as clearly sharpness. Vulnerability to flare is indeed a problem in some cases but in others it makes the composition non-trivial and absolutely creative. In fact, the flare it generates (especially without a lampshade) is not incisive or said in a word "ugly" (like those lenses that make the sun all in pointed rays), but it leads to a loss of gradual and nuanced contrast. If your specimen does not have the original Hb-1 lampshade you can find it on e-bay, where the original is equal but plastic at 5 degrees, since the originals travel on 30 degrees.

There are 20 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Untitled Photo

by RiccardoBucchino
3 comments, 1249 views

The 3 hills - Bern

by RiccardoBucchino
0 comments, 997 views

Waiting for spring

by Carla2t
0 comments, 517 views

Boccadasse

by Gquad
0 comments, 680 views

Carzano - Glimpse of court

by Orco
0 comments, 681 views

Towards the spring light.

by Andreaf948
2 comments, 278 views

Dome of the Capuchins

by Merendino Santo
2 comments, 442 views

Castle Cingolo Po

by Eemac73
0 comments, 348 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Up there

by Nicoles
0 comments, 91 views

Reflections 3

by Maxligr777
0 comments, 424 views

Positano 1

by Franco B
0 comments, 508 views

Positano 2

by Franco B
1 comments, 615 views

Liberty

by Ivano Frosi
0 comments, 321 views

Monferrato hills

by Seve1966
2 comments, 872 views

Natural umbrellas

by Ivano Frosi
0 comments, 366 views

Untitled Photo

by Twiggy_ramirez2e
2 comments, 316 views

by Roberto Nisi
2 comments, 328 views

Path of limits

by Anttesi
12 comments, 369 views

Untitled Photo

by Roberto Nisi
0 comments, 218 views

Untitled Photo

by Roberto Nisi
0 comments, 235 views

The cloud

by Roberto Nisi
2 comments, 334 views

The spouses

by Roberto Nisi
0 comments, 219 views

THE TWO trees

by Roberto Nisi
2 comments, 273 views

THE junction

by Roberto Nisi
2 comments, 271 views

The plain of castelluccio

by Roberto Nisi
2 comments, 351 views

Ortisei

by Redel
0 comments, 529 views

Slippers stretched

by Roberto Nisi
0 comments, 174 views

The road

by Roberto Nisi
0 comments, 189 views

Red Moon

by Manrico Chiti
0 comments, 358 views

Towards the Rods

by Giuseppe Tuttobene
4 comments, 339 views

Villa Tiepolo Steps

by Celemattia
0 comments, 352 views

Lessinia

by Filippo Trevisan
0 comments, 314 views

City Tower

by Celemattia
1 comments, 299 views

Good bite

by Nanker
1 comments, 508 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Landscape with snow

by Franco B
0 comments, 679 views

Yellow flowers

by Franco B
0 comments, 604 views

Sunset on the lagoon

by Sadiego
0 comments, 120 views

« PREVIOUS PAGE

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think?

Photos taken with Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8