Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR, front

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR, back

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR, top

The Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2024. The focus is done by Linear Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 649 €;

22 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-50 mm
Angle of view	83 - 31.6° (equivalent to a 24-75mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8-4.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	11 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.24 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.30x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	No
Focus	Linear Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	58 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	240 g
Dimensions	65 x 71 mm
Buy
Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 260000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mac_Protelli

sent on 14 Aprile 2026

Pros: Very light, excellent kit version with few optical errors and beautiful optical performance, optimized for 40MP sensors.

Cons: No objections to make.

Opinion: Now I have also tried the small Fuji 16-50WR, but some quick comparisons with the Fuji 16-55WR / Fuji 23 2.8 became a bit tiring at first, there are no differences too big, just maybe with a very extreme magnification you can perhaps see some differences. So the zoom is great for a kit version. There is no drop in performance at any focal length, even the mechanics are perfect fluid beautiful, so I can not confirm certain tests and criticisms on this lens, perhaps problem specimens or AF which is very frequent on the Fujifilm system. The construction is not metal, it doesn't bother me, it's extremely light just like the new Fuji 23 2.8, Fujifilm has done a very convincing job. Note: a very compact lightweight Fuji telephoto lens modern line 50-150mm f4.0 with macro function would be nice, and I think this is an extremely lacking lack in the system so as to complement in pair various focal lengths with new Fuji 16-50/16-55 MKII zooms. Tried with an 11mm extension tube for me very much to recommend the AF much better than the Fuji 60 macro also enlarges the small zoom just as much. If today I had to choose between the new Fuji 16-55 MKII vs 16-50WR I would choose the smaller 16-50, for reasons even more compact, macro functions higher magnifications, colors I prefer a more neutral one of the 16-50, wide angle slightly higher the angle of view at 16mm, differences sharpness visible only at considerable magnifications, aperture f2.8 also present at 16mm 16-50. For me recommended the Fuji 16-50WR for small Fujifilm camera bodies where you don't need a lens with a lot of brightness, example landscape photography very recommended.

Evann60

sent on 04 Marzo 2026

Pros: Lightweight, significantly sharper and more contrasted images than its predecessors, useful focal range over the entire range.

Cons: Not stabilized, plasticky (but on the other hand it is light), rather dark at high focal lengths.

Opinion: Hard to say anything different from previous reviews... I'll try. I got it for two months new out-of-bundle at 490, I looked around but I didn't find a better offer. The list price of over 700 in my opinion is not worth it. Among the many Fuji zoom lenses and compatible with similar focal lengths, the most sensible comparison is with the 18-55 that it replaces in the Fujifilm catalog. I'm using it a lot with an excellent XT20 unfortunately without OIS; it is said that it was born for the 40MP of the XT50 with which it is sold in a bundle, but even on the 24MP of the XT20 the difference in sharpness with the 18-55 is not a small thing, and not only in the center but also at the edges of the frame; images with greater micro-detail and also sharper and more highlighted lines (buildings, architecture, etc.), sometimes a bit 'hard' so detailed it is. So much so that often in PP I have to slightly reduce the contrast, which I don't do with the other lenses. The colors are vivid and faithful as from Fujifilm, compared to the 18-55 perhaps a little more flare but nothing compared to the 15-45 (which costs a third). The real shame is that for 70 grams less, 240 against 310, compared to the 18-55 it loses stabilization, what did it take to put it? There is even on the 15/45 which costs and weighs very little. Did they remove it to induce the purchase of stabilized models? Also this 16-50 is fairly cheap to build. Being also a bit dark at 50mm (4.8 against 4.0 to 55 of the other) without a tripod the danger of micro-blur is there and you often have to raise the ISO even in broad daylight. In short, pros and cons but if what matters most are the images, this 16-50 objectively takes better photos than the 18-55, the 15-45 (of course) and beats it with the 10/24 F4 which remains one of the best X-mount zooms ever. But for my use (landscapes, architecture) the 16-50 focal length is more usable and in fact while deprecating the absence of OIS and owning these other 3 lenses that have it, lately I use almost only it. I recommend it without reservation only if paid new from 500 downwards otherwise it is better to look elsewhere. I gave him 9 because there is no 8.5. PS Rereading myself maybe I was too strict but I couldn't try it at its best on machines with OIS and more megapixels, that is from the X-S10 upwards.

Pamar5

sent on 12 Gennaio 2026

Pros: Compact and light, solid, tropicalized, very good performance, it does not stretch when zoomed in.

Cons: Continuous diaphragm ring that can be easily touched unintentionally

Opinion: I have owned this zoom for about 4 months, bought used. Its compactness and low weight are immediately evident. The construction is good and gives an idea of solidity. Positive is the fact that it does not lengthen with the zoom and that it is tropicalized. It is not a super bright prime zoom. The f2.8, the maximum aperture, is preserved only at the wide-angle end. At 16.5 he already closes a hair at f2.9. At 18 mm it closes to f3.0, at 24 mm f3.4, at 35 mm we are already at f3.9, at 40 mm f4.3 and at 50 mm we arrive at f4.8. Nothing dramatic, knowing their behavior. For daytime photography or in non-dark conditions it performs well. The performance, in my opinion, is good on the entire excursion, even at bright apertures. Used on the road, it proved to be very versatile and as mentioned comfortable and practical to carry around due to weight and size. If you want for general excursions, he alone could be enough for the range of excursions covered. However, it also has some negative points, for example it happens to me to involuntarily move the ring of diaphragms which is continuous, without wanting or realizing it, because I find it quite smooth. This sometimes led me to disable it and use a dial on the camera body. Perhaps the unintentional operation also depends on its small size, because this problem did not occur to me with larger zooms with a ring of the same type. Mark

Preben Elkjaer

sent on 05 Luglio 2025

Pros: Image quality even at 40MP, lightness and bulk, AF, 2 mm less wide-angle side (16) than the old one, build quality, WR, 58mm filter like many other Fuji lenses (23, 33, etc.)

Cons: Maybe the price if you take it not in kit: but the optics are really good.

Opinion: It is the classic travel zoom or excursion equivalent of a 24-75 on FF: therefore an all-rounder. Lightweight (240 grams), compact (the barrel does not lengthen by changing focal length), well built, water resistant, it has an image quality capable of easily withstanding 40 MP, where the previous 18-55 now suffered a bit. If you don't need the fixed 2.8, this is the right lens for your needs. The AF is fast and accurate; the very detailed image on the 40 sensor also allows for rather generous crops; Decent flare resistance. A lens without any particular weaknesses, as pointed out by "Lenstip" (trusted site) and also the test of Juza himself. The advice is to take it in a kit, or mismatched from a kit, because it costs much less. One final note: the 58 filter is the same as many other Fuji lenses (23 1.4, 33 1.4, etc.): which is a convenience and cost advantage.

Sigmarco

sent on 05 Luglio 2025

Pros: Image quality, lightness, construction, magnification, autofocus, size

Cons: Price, if taken new. The internal zoom could be closed by a front lens (perhaps)

Opinion: It is the perfect travel and trekking lens for those looking for practicality without sacrificing quality. It covers all useful focal lengths from true wide-angle to mid-telephoto, and thanks to the digital crop on the 40MP of the X-T50 it virtually reaches a 24-105 equivalent, maintaining more than decent files. Sharp, compact, well-built and weather resistant, it also allows excellent close-ups without the need for a dedicated macro lens. It's not a forum zoom or pixel peeper, but it's the one that really makes you leave the house with only one lens and zero regrets. The only two "flaws" are a new price that could discourage you, but there are so many used ones separated from kits and then a suggestion: perhaps the internal zoom (very smart in my opinion), could have been covered by a front lens and avoid dust infiltration. WR will also be seeing it like this, but it doesn't really give me maximum confidence. In any case, a (not so much) kit zoom, really well made.

There are 5 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
20 comments, 665 views

High-altitude lakes

by Andrea900
28 comments, 1234 views

Face to face

by Andrea900
20 comments, 548 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
26 comments, 538 views

Cyclist backlit

by SimoneOssola
33 comments, 539 views

Queen Sirikit National Convention Center

by Juza
2 comments, 1087 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
29 comments, 961 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
17 comments, 383 views

Untitled

by SimoneOssola
29 comments, 536 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
19 comments, 303 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
15 comments, 162 views

Autumn-colored sea

by Andrea900
17 comments, 602 views

Castle of Azzate

by SimoneOssola
20 comments, 353 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
21 comments, 730 views

Overflow

by Rocco
13 comments, 272 views

November

by SimoneOssola
33 comments, 365 views

Fort Tre Sassi

by Andrea900
18 comments, 694 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
6 comments, 767 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
10 comments, 510 views

The Canyon

by Andrea900
10 comments, 392 views

Dolomite lands

by Andrea900
17 comments, 605 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
13 comments, 230 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
11 comments, 556 views

Civita di Bagnoregio

by Marco O.
3 comments, 270 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
7 comments, 418 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
13 comments, 590 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
8 comments, 112 views

Claudia and Andreine B/W

by Salvopc
1 comments, 741 views

The sea in winter.

by Giorgio Carlon
1 comments, 170 views

The attention

by Rocco
3 comments, 191 views

The Priora beech trees

by Rob22
5 comments, 198 views

Delta del Po

by Manifest
0 comments, 178 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

I'm watching you.

by Salvopc
2 comments, 477 views

Atrium #1

by Spaziogio
12 comments, 146 views

Untitled

by SimoneOssola
4 comments, 201 views

Clear and fresh

by Andrea900
5 comments, 62 views

Untitled Photo

by Parzone
4 comments, 206 views

« PREVIOUS PAGE

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think?

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR