JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD is a superzoom lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2020. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 583 €;
58 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:sometimes mellow result, it is difficult to hook close to 200
Opinion:Guys, what more do you want? at 28 allows you to shoot at 2.8 ... It is possible to reach 200mm and 300 in APSC being able to expand the shooting possibilities out of all proportion. LIGHTWEIGHT LAPTOP with lock button so it won't open in your bag ..... SUPERLATIVE SHARPNESS for a zoom. ATTENTION is not a fixed do not expect absurd results, it is sometimes pasty and inaccurate but if kept within 100 it becomes a beast of detail, they compared it to the 70 200 sony F4, only that here it starts from 28 and you can go down to 2.8 ....... I don't know in my opinion ask for the moon if you want better
Cons:If from 28mm f2.8 it had reached 280-300mm they would be bingo (if my grandmother had wheels ..)
Opinion:Given the reviews and more than anything else the photos I decided and I took it. It is practically an all-rounder without ever leaving a bitter taste in the mouth and, once you get the hang of it, it churns out portraits, landscapes, interiors and even a bit of macro that at 200mm I find it leveled to many lenses tried to date. Outdoors he is not afraid of blur, indoors even a mono-pod can be enough to make a good impression. The question is: what alternatively? I wouldn't know at that price, at that weight and at that result it offers. PS: it accepts extension tubes well but not so much the additional lenses.
Pros:Size, sharpness, versatility, value for money and versatility
Cons:Few for the type of lens
Opinion:Perfect optics for travel and beyond, for a superzoom it has a surprising quality. I use it on an a7III and in Af-c it works great, I photograph my children playing football and tennis and I find one photo out of focus on 20. Great colors and sharpness. Many compare it to the Sony 28-105, the latter is slightly better at the edges (but slightly lower in the center), so given the value for money and the focal range, I recommend the Tamron without any doubt
Opinion:A perspective that must absolutely be contextualized. I use it on APSC and I find it irreplaceable for travel and nature reportage. After a few months of use I can be very satisfied, a 42-300 f2.8-5.6 in just over 500gr and 11cm is absolutely amazing, considering that in the travel kit I also have the fantastic 11-20 f2.8 makes all the footprint almost incredible, with travel from 16mm to 300mm in total 850gr, maintaining an excellent general brightness. The minimum MF a couple of cm from the lens hood is a boost to creativity. The good optical performance cannot reach the level of lenses that weigh at least twice as much, while the AF stepper is powerful for general reportage, it loses something only in low light or at very small apertures. I consider the absences of VR, aperture ring, function keys, usb and other marginal frills positive and in line with the construction logic of the lens. The day they update it by adding all or some of these options, this version will become even more valuable. Unrivalled "Less is more" superzoom lens. Yet another Tamron genius that I find more apt on APSC than on FF.
Opinion:I have three kits and in the end I always go out with Tamron. The 17-28 and 28-200 are two lenses that allow you to travel light. Another strong point of the brand is that the lenses all have the same filter diameter. The 28-200 gives up something in terms of resolution but only perceptible during a direct confrontation with any other noble competitor. In a 50x70 print, you don't notice anything.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
