RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions


Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

The Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2006 to 2009 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 900 €;
24 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   70-200 mm
 Angle of view   34.4 - 12.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 14 groups
 Min. focus distance   1.8 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.13x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   1270 g
 Dimensions   86 x 184 mm

 Buy

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM, buy on Ebay Ebay

  JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 245000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on June 01, 2024

Pros: PRICE, good optical quality, construction.

Cons: nobody

Opinion: Very solid and honest lens, at the price at which it is found it is highly recommended and capable of churning out even professional images if the photographer knows what he is doing. On Full-Frame at 24 Mpx it is optically fine and is easily usable even at TA with understandable loss of engraving at 200mm but nothing terrible. Closing to F4 the sharpness improves well and also withstands demanding resolutions and APS-C crops, the image rendering has a bit of "vintage" but the detail is high. It weighs quite a lot like all the 70-200 2.8 and even something more for the granite construction, it is not stabilized so pay attention to safety times. In the mirroless era (and F4 tele at 2000€ list) it is an excellent cheap long, to have a significantly higher yield you have to spend much more. There are many versions, I had two, the first "APO" with aperture ring and the more modern EX II Macro and with MAF close to one meter that I still use with satisfaction on reflex. Sometimes it is also adapted to Fujifilm where to get a good detail on the 24-26 sensors it is better to consider it an F4.

user215205
avatarjunior
sent on January 20, 2021

Pros: Construction, optical quality, fixed opening, diaphragm ring in the Nikon version.

Cons: Delicate coating.

Opinion: I'm not one to do fleas every single pixel of the images, apart from the "peeling" of the coating, I have no complaints about this optics, precise and fast focus, at least for my needs, optically very good, the flare, although present in certain situations, is quite contained, not higher than that of other similar optics, but with the most famous brand, even if the wording APO is a little exaggerated, the chromatic aberrations are quite contained. I used it, and I still use it, in the most disparate situations, and it never betrayed me. The iris ring, in my version for Nikon, makes it usable on all cameras in this house, including analog. Compared to the Nikon 80-200 F/2.8 pump, which I used for a long time, optically does not disfigure at all, on the contrary, and the maf is much faster and quieter.

avatarsenior
sent on April 12, 2017

Pros: Construction, sharpness, starry at night, value for money, absent chromatic aberrations.

Cons: Use multiplied to the limit, loss of typical coating of sigma, af valid, but not very fast.

Opinion: is an excellent 70-200 cheap, my copy I took it semi destroyed to 240 euros, but still optically very efficient. The sharpness is good although of course at 2.8 does not break the hair (as it is honest), but closing is really defending very well and the diaphragm with 9 blades you see everything in the night and in the blurred, now is the best starry I've ever found in a lens. The construction is great, by tank, if the copy I had found I still went is a virtually immortal lens. It Has several limits in the multiplied use, considering its 2x up to 300mm is more or less acceptable closing, besides it becomes aberrant even closing a lot, to do something remotely acceptable you have to close to F11-F13. The AF is already ultrasonic, but it is not in step with the times, for more with time the clutches of the full time MF are kneading and can be dragged behind the outer ring together with the elements of the lens. It Can be a very valid alternative to a 70-300 paying no more than 300-350 euros for a specimen kept well, besides so much worth taking the OS version

avatarjunior
sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: 2.8 aperture, zoom and internal mf, very solid construction, fluid ferrules, good excursion of mf ring, sharpness, color tone, it is FF, speed and accuracy AF good.

Cons: unserviceable at minimum focus distance and 2.8 ingombroe weight (which is also considered 2.8 remains a beast), unusable with direct sun in the frame, even diaphragmed.

Opinion: Used only on the right coupled with Nikon d300. It 'a good deal because it has a good cost-performance ratio. My copy has the defects that I describe above, I do not know if it's common problems. Unlike what I read in other reviews mine has no problem back focus. Its advantage is the price: it costs as a Nikon 80-200 first original series but is more modern and HSM.

avatarjunior
sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: HSM Autofocus, aesthetics

Cons: Everything, zero contrast weight of stabilizer tropicalizzatornAssenza

Opinion: I had this zoom for two months, sold out of desperation, suffering from back focus weighs very heavy, although these lenses is normal, the sore point of this now optical dated and exceeded the quality of the mediocre, slow, often having the lenses untreated sufferers magenta casts, under the 125 second if you do not use a monopod is often risks camera shake, under daylight conditions works decently, although much advice Nikon rende.rnOttica coast sconsigliornrnVoto 5




Photos taken with Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

Foto
Child of the village
by Massimo Bruno
61 comments, 4528 views  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Flamingo
by Federico_28
132 comments, 6226 views  
HI RES 9.2 MP

Foto
Autumn
by Mary
45 comments, 1322 views
Foto
A jump into the past
by Fabrelio
34 comments, 2413 views  
HI RES 15.2 MP

Foto
Retone
by Galskap
22 comments, 1207 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Massimo Bruno
23 comments, 3746 views  
HI RES 20.0 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Peasant grandmother
by Massimo Bruno
39 comments, 3483 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
One night in Flam
by Miketm
19 comments, 1859 views  
HI RES 4.0 MP

Foto
Slide the end of 80 years
by Federico_28
58 comments, 4035 views  
HI RES 18.1 MP

Foto
The breath of the trees
by Mary
24 comments, 669 views
Foto
My house
by Mary
35 comments, 862 views
Foto
Deer Mesola
by Finco
9 comments, 2607 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Massimo Bruno
8 comments, 1786 views  
HI RES 10.1 MP

Foto
People of Gubbio
by Mmmarci69
15 comments, 2531 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Vincenzo 1986
60 comments, 2247 views  
HI RES 16.1 MP

Foto
Maristella
by Mmmarci69
31 comments, 3005 views
Foto
The Corsa dei Ceri
by Mmmarci69
21 comments, 1581 views
Foto
Deer Mesola
by Finco
6 comments, 2093 views  
HI RES 10.0 MP

Foto
Girls today ...
by Mmmarci69
19 comments, 1903 views
Foto
Blue
by Vincenzo 1986
37 comments, 2353 views  
HI RES 14.9 MP

Foto
Desia
by Massimo Bruno
9 comments, 1786 views  
HI RES 9.5 MP

Foto
Julia2
by Stefedange
12 comments, 254 views  
HI RES 10.4 MP

Foto
Heron
by Federico_28
41 comments, 2320 views  
HI RES 10.7 MP

Foto
Race of the past
by Fabrelio
17 comments, 1185 views  
HI RES 15.1 MP

Foto
A "rellistic" Autumn
by LoriCava
34 comments, 1891 views  
HI RES 20.7 MP

Foto
Sunset on Brahmaputra
by Massimo Bruno
26 comments, 1596 views  
HI RES 10.1 MP

Foto
The deer Mesola
by Finco
6 comments, 2090 views  
HI RES 6.0 MP

Foto
Julia6
by Stefedange
10 comments, 264 views  
HI RES 12.2 MP

Foto
A few ferns
by Mary
31 comments, 497 views
Foto
Golden Hour
by Stefano67
8 comments, 739 views  
HI RES 11.0 MP

Foto
First variant in Monza
by Luca87
10 comments, 1535 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Massimo Bruno
2 comments, 1196 views  
HI RES 10.1 MP

Foto
Docking
by Federico_28
18 comments, 1345 views  
HI RES 7.9 MP

Foto
Child of the village
by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 1973 views  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Isabell 1
by Stefano67
8 comments, 1240 views  
HI RES 7.8 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 1269 views  
HI RES 9.5 MP

Foto
Ophelia
by Stefano67
3 comments, 1810 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me