JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

The Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2006 to 2009 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price was 900 €;

24 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	17 elements in 14 groups
Min. focus distance	1.8 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.13x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	1270 g
Dimensions	86 x 184 mm
Buy
Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Fcornia

sent on June 01, 2024

Pros: PRICE, very solid construction, aberration handling, bokeh, close-range rendering.

Cons: Weight, infinite AF calibration (my sample), firmware compatibility.

Opinion: There are many versions, I had two, the first "APO" with aperture ring and the more modern EX II Macro and with MAF close to one meter that I still use with satisfaction for several years. An honest lens, capable of churning out professional images if the photographer knows what he is doing. My sample is very good at close and medium range, at infinity the AF is unreliable, so I consider it a 70-200 for reportage and portraiture and for this reason I use it. On Full-Frame at 24 Mpx it is optically fine and is easily usable even at TA with an understandable drop in engraving on longer focal lengths where the image at full aperture loses contrast as well as detail (spherical aberration?) but remains absolutely usable especially at close range. Closing to F4 the sharpness and microcontrast improve significantly, the lens also supports demanding resolutions and APS-C crops around 24 megapixels. The rendering of the image is classic, not sharp but the detail comes to be very high. The bokeh is good, without crying out for a miracle: it has no major defects, just a bit of outline on the light points, the aberrations are well controlled. It weighs a lot like all the 70-200 2.8 and even a little more for the granite construction (in metal), it is not stabilized so pay attention to safety times. In the mirroless era (and F4 canvases at € 2000 list) you have to consider the quality/price ratio, to have a significantly higher optical performance than TA you have to go to the top brands or the most recent versions of the best generalist manufacturers. The autofocus is quite performing, it is definitely a lens to recommend to those who want an old-school 70-200 f2.8 at the price of a dark plasticetto in 2024. Regarding a use in the video field, it is not parfocal and has a lot of focus-breathing especially on long focal lengths.

user215205

sent on January 20, 2021

Pros: Construction, optical quality, fixed opening, diaphragm ring in the Nikon version.

Cons: Delicate coating.

Opinion: I'm not one to do fleas every single pixel of the images, apart from the "peeling" of the coating, I have no complaints about this optics, precise and fast focus, at least for my needs, optically very good, the flare, although present in certain situations, is quite contained, not higher than that of other similar optics, but with the most famous brand, even if the wording APO is a little exaggerated, the chromatic aberrations are quite contained. I used it, and I still use it, in the most disparate situations, and it never betrayed me. The iris ring, in my version for Nikon, makes it usable on all cameras in this house, including analog. Compared to the Nikon 80-200 F/2.8 pump, which I used for a long time, optically does not disfigure at all, on the contrary, and the maf is much faster and quieter.

Matteo N.

sent on April 12, 2017

Pros: Construction, sharpness, starry at night, value for money, absent chromatic aberrations.

Cons: Use multiplied to the limit, loss of typical coating of sigma, af valid, but not very fast.

Opinion: is an excellent 70-200 cheap, my copy I took it semi destroyed to 240 euros, but still optically very efficient. The sharpness is good although of course at 2.8 does not break the hair (as it is honest), but closing is really defending very well and the diaphragm with 9 blades you see everything in the night and in the blurred, now is the best starry I've ever found in a lens. The construction is great, by tank, if the copy I had found I still went is a virtually immortal lens. It Has several limits in the multiplied use, considering its 2x up to 300mm is more or less acceptable closing, besides it becomes aberrant even closing a lot, to do something remotely acceptable you have to close to F11-F13. The AF is already ultrasonic, but it is not in step with the times, for more with time the clutches of the full time MF are kneading and can be dragged behind the outer ring together with the elements of the lens. It Can be a very valid alternative to a 70-300 paying no more than 300-350 euros for a specimen kept well, besides so much worth taking the OS version

Bm75

sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: 2.8 aperture, zoom and internal mf, very solid construction, fluid ferrules, good excursion of mf ring, sharpness, color tone, it is FF, speed and accuracy AF good.

Cons: unserviceable at minimum focus distance and 2.8 ingombroe weight (which is also considered 2.8 remains a beast), unusable with direct sun in the frame, even diaphragmed.

Opinion: Used only on the right coupled with Nikon d300. It 'a good deal because it has a good cost-performance ratio. My copy has the defects that I describe above, I do not know if it's common problems. Unlike what I read in other reviews mine has no problem back focus. Its advantage is the price: it costs as a Nikon 80-200 first original series but is more modern and HSM.

Iziomio75

sent on April 01, 2017

Pros: HSM Autofocus, aesthetics

Cons: Everything, zero contrast weight of stabilizer tropicalizzatornAssenza

Opinion: I had this zoom for two months, sold out of desperation, suffering from back focus weighs very heavy, although these lenses is normal, the sore point of this now optical dated and exceeded the quality of the mediocre, slow, often having the lenses untreated sufferers magenta casts, under the 125 second if you do not use a monopod is often risks camera shake, under daylight conditions works decently, although much advice Nikon rende.rnOttica coast sconsigliornrnVoto 5

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

Milan Boxing Night 2

by Antonino Caldarella
50 comments, 3253 views [editors pick]

Child of the village

by Massimo Bruno
61 comments, 5095 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Flamingo

by Federico_28
132 comments, 7079 views

HI RES 9.2 MP

Autumn

by Mary
46 comments, 2091 views

A jump into the past

by Fabrelio
34 comments, 2721 views

HI RES 15.2 MP

Retone

by Galskap
22 comments, 1462 views

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
23 comments, 4104 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Peasant grandmother

by Massimo Bruno
39 comments, 3883 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

One night in Flam

by Miketm
19 comments, 2080 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Slide the end of 80 years

by Federico_28
58 comments, 4449 views

HI RES 18.1 MP

People of Gubbio

by Mmmarci69
15 comments, 2887 views

The breath of the trees

by Mary
24 comments, 1137 views

The Corsa dei Ceri

by Mmmarci69
23 comments, 2133 views

My house

by Mary
35 comments, 1330 views

Deer Mesola

by Finco
9 comments, 2972 views

Maristella

by Mmmarci69
31 comments, 3435 views

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
8 comments, 1967 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Deer Mesola

by Finco
6 comments, 2318 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

Girls today ...

by Mmmarci69
19 comments, 2134 views

Julia2

by Stefedange
12 comments, 538 views

HI RES 10.4 MP

Desia

by Massimo Bruno
9 comments, 1913 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Heron

by Federico_28
41 comments, 2654 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Race of the past

by Fabrelio
17 comments, 1359 views

HI RES 15.1 MP

A "rellistic" Autumn

by LoriCava
34 comments, 2275 views

HI RES 20.7 MP

Sunset on Brahmaputra

by Massimo Bruno
26 comments, 1881 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

The deer Mesola

by Finco
6 comments, 2265 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Julia6

by Stefedange
10 comments, 523 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

A few ferns

by Mary
32 comments, 914 views

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
2 comments, 1338 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Golden Hour

by Stefano67
8 comments, 929 views

HI RES 11.0 MP

First variant in Monza

by Luca87
10 comments, 1709 views

Docking

by Federico_28
18 comments, 1499 views

HI RES 7.9 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Ophelia

by Stefano67
3 comments, 2040 views

Child of the village

by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 2122 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Isabell 1

by Stefano67
8 comments, 1417 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Massimo Bruno
17 comments, 1412 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Julia

by Stefedange
10 comments, 458 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM