JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN C is a tele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 459 €;
43 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.
Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon RF.
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Nikon Z.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.
L-Mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C L-Mount.
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Barrel distortion - no stabilizer - marked detachment between focal planes at T.A.
Opinion:Taken used at about 320€ x M3 and M6 old - I have many lenses around this focal length, including EF 50 f 1.8 STM, EF 50 f 1.4, kamlan 50 f 1.1 and many vintage Mf ---- it is a quality glass, with natural color rendering and strength in the reproduction of detail, which remains good even at T.A. - this can be a pro or a con, for example in portraiture, where sometimes, I prefer the softer rendering and the colors of the Ef 50 f 1.4 --- just to make the comparison, the Ef is much more progressive, in the detachment between the focal planes at T.A. ---- the Sigma is a glass whose behavior in various situations must be known - on subjects that fill the frame and where the background is marginal, all its potential comes out, where at T.A. you appreciate the rendering of detail and blur - if instead you use it in close-up settings, where the background requires soft and progressive blur .... the problems begin - the subject benefits from all the advantages of the optics, but the blur becomes unpleasant and the detachment of the planes very (too) marked ... much more unpleasant than the Samyang 85 f1.4 first version, for example - in these cases you have to resign yourself to closing the aperture and to f 5.6/6.3 and it resolves ---- x as for the negative aspects, a stabilizer would have been useful, since anyway, we are talking about a focal eq of 112mm on M4/3 and almost 90mm on Canon aps-c ... but weight and size (as well as the price), would inevitably have risen - the only real negative aspect is the marked barrel distortion on the straight lines near the edges (problem also encountered by another user), which in certain contexts, although correctable, is very annoying - in conclusion, a glass that cannot be missing in an aps-c or M4/3 kit and that for some can be enough as the only representative in that focal range, while x others (like myself), is not enough in generalist use, where you need to place it side by side with a glass with characteristics at the antipodes ....
Pros:Sharpness also TA, blur rendering, focusing speed (SU M4/3)
Cons:None
Opinion:Simply one of the best, if not the best lens for micro 4/3 as far as value for money is concerned. I also had the 75 1.8 but I find this lens much more versatile and also sharper. Phenomenal, coupled with a panaleica 25mm 1.4 and a panaleica 15mm 1.7 you have everything you could want on a micro 4/3 body as far as fixed and if you want to stay compact.
Opinion:Fantastic portrait lens for mft. It doesn't make you regret the FF. Crisp already at full opening. At F2.8 it is a blade. Nice soft blurred it. Too bad sigma has stopped producing x mft lenses. I own it together with the 16. Now I will also take the 30. F1.4 does not differ so much from the pro 1.2 lenses. In terms of light, it is blurred. Of course, those are even better and built with better materials. Slightly tropicalized. But for the cost of these 3 sigma lenses you can't get any better. Halfway between the prime 1.7 lenses and the pro 1.2. Promoted
Opinion:My favorite lens with the Sony a6700. Superlative optical quality, always sharp, the images have a particular three-dimensionality. Soft and mellow bokeh. Perfect autofocus. The stabilization on the sensor of the a6700 with this lens works particularly well compared to others, I tried to shoot even at 1/2 second.
Opinion:Used for a few years on the Eos M5, it won me over immediately, undermining the excellent EF-M 32, and becoming the lens always mounted on the camera. Used in every context, from portraits to landscapes, from sports to macro (with extension tubes) it has always performed very well with sharp images (already at CT), well contrasted and practically free of defects (not even a hint of fringing). Behavior more like a macro lens than a medium-telephoto portrait lens. Of course it is not stabilized, and this on Eos M bodies can be a limitation, especially in night photography, but perhaps also thanks to this it remains small and light. Too bad I can't reuse it on R8, it's a lens that I really miss (and it makes me want to pick up the M5 again), although the 100 2.0 behaves well, the performance of the small sigma is of another level.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
