JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Olympus
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro is a standard lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1041 €;

31 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	25 mm
Angle of view	46.3° (equivalent to a 51mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/1.2
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	19 elements in 14 groups
Min. focus distance	0.19 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.11x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	410 g
Dimensions	70 x 87 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Basilio Leone

sent on November 05, 2025

Pros: Sharpness on all apertures, construction!

Cons: Addictive

Opinion: What about this lens? 19 elements with minimal weight and a performance that leaves you speechless! At 1.2 and at very high levels that not even ff reaches, colors and contrast are as expected from such a lens! It is devoted to portraiture and low lights... but also for street and superlative! I use his M1/2 with maximum satisfaction, I will complete the triad with the 17, and 45 always 1.2! The price is ridiculous for the Qi it offers! Very solid construction, leaves a feeling of yesteryear... change of mf from auto to manual by moving back only the ring on the lens, a gem of Oly, in short, it is an OLYMPUS masterpiece!!!

Vincenzo f

sent on December 19, 2021

Pros: Construction, already excellent rendering at ta, color rendering, blurred

Cons: Not received

Opinion: I am repeating myself after the 17 1.2 I took the 25 1.2 the yield is extraordinary, even the dimensions are not excessive, the leap in quality compared to the 25 1 8 zuiko is remarkable. Even compared to the panaleica 25 1.4 that I kept to mount it on the epl7, up to f2 they do not equalize, leaving out the difference in construction and af as speed and precision

Vincenzo f

user132716

sent on January 19, 2021

Pros: Full-aperture sharpness, fast and precise autofocus even in low light conditions.. And then top construction

Cons: If I really have to find one, at f 1.2 I noticed that slightly vignette, which already at 1.4 seems to disappear.

Opinion: I was very wary of this goal, perhaps more for the love/hate relationship for the 50mm or equivalent as in this case, or perhaps conditioned by some criticism when it came out. I have had it for a few days, but I squeezed it a little, not in tests that measure its peculiarities in a scientific way, but relying on comparisons, with similar lenses and where the only judge is visual perception. Taken to replace the 25 1.4 panaleic, with which I made a satisfactory path in my opinion, so I do not feel to criticize it now that no longer in my possession, if not for a really unreliable autofocus in many circumstances. So first of all I struggled to show a small gap between 25 1.4 pana, and this 25 1.2 pro, this in good light conditions. Then going further, and good or bad shooting with similar parameters, in conditions of really poor light, in addition to the efficiency of autofocus, a rendering of details emerged, of the creaminess of the blurry, and above all in really difficult conditions, an extraordinary color rendering.. And I already considered the panaleic one excellent, but this is definitely on another level. But still hesitant about a form of bias, I put it to the test with brother 17 1.2, identical in appearance and function, same speed and autofocus accuracy. There are multiple shots with the same opening and the same light, with the only precaution of getting a little closer to the subjects with the 17, to maintain proportions. Result: for sharpness on most image, I would say equal to the excellent 17 1.2, which I consider a masterpiece of lens, I did not deepen in the extreme corners of the image, but overall I did not notice great differences, if not more neutral and slightly colors, colder in 17 mm, warmer and tending to magenta in 25mm.. But values that then in posts are managed at will. What really surprised me, and removed any doubt about the very high yield of this goal, were some shots in a semi-dark church, and something That I had already partly noticed, this lens returns beautiful colors even in shaded areas, almost as well as well-lit ones, and... This fact is surprising because with the naked eye these colors are not so full of intensity and nuances, as evidently in the dark we perceive them desaturated.. And so it usually happens with goalses, not so pure glass. In summary: He sees as a cat.

Aznavour65

sent on February 16, 2017

Pros: Sharpness at TA, great bokeh considering system 4/3

Cons: Maybe the price?

Opinion: I had 50 mm sigma art 1.4 having taken off all the Nikon kit I could not replace the 50 with this. Those who complain of the weight to me are coming to smile, is half the sigma. However I essentially use it in portraits, excellent rendering, sharpness already af / 1.2 that does not exist in full size, fast focus and precise. I feel it better at sigma but for clarity and weight. Excellent construction as all pros

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

The suitcase of memories

by Ivan.pirina
116 comments, 18134 views [editors pick]

AURUM

by Eppuresoffia
28 comments, 5931 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Clear

by Riccardob77
13 comments, 6119 views

Angelina!

by Riccardob77
16 comments, 8074 views

Hops... Excuse me, but I could not resist ...

by Eppuresoffia
26 comments, 10044 views

HI RES 11.2 MP

Leaves

by Eppuresoffia
24 comments, 3571 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

LEAVES

by Eppuresoffia
23 comments, 2780 views

HI RES 14.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Travel Fatigue

by Ivan.pirina
8 comments, 4999 views

Angelica

by Riccardob77
12 comments, 4933 views

HI RES 5.6 MP

Caress

by Ivan.pirina
14 comments, 4059 views

Gold Bronze

by Eppuresoffia
13 comments, 2475 views

HI RES 16.5 MP

Sophie

by Eppuresoffia
17 comments, 4357 views

HI RES 14.9 MP

Light painting

by Japandrea
64 comments, 1864 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Joie de vivre

by Eppuresoffia
19 comments, 4912 views

HI RES 17.6 MP

Sarah

by Dierre.ph
3 comments, 1561 views

After the party...

by Eppuresoffia
23 comments, 4259 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Princess black and white

by Ioluca
13 comments, 3443 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

BODY PAINTING

by Eppuresoffia
20 comments, 2843 views

HI RES 17.4 MP

Different ...

by Beppe Cavalleri
10 comments, 3062 views

Ludovica wishes you a happy Easter Monday

by Eppuresoffia
13 comments, 3150 views

HI RES 17.6 MP

THE LIONESS.

by Eppuresoffia
29 comments, 3442 views

HI RES 13.8 MP

Lightning and lightning at the Pieve di Corticelle July 25

by Zoralb
14 comments, 430 views

HI RES 11.9 MP

Simona

by Dierre.ph
5 comments, 562 views

Untitled Photo

by Zindo
13 comments, 3273 views

Jade

by Aznavour65
4 comments, 2624 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

The gold and silver in Rome

by Ivan.pirina
4 comments, 2970 views

DARK

by Eppuresoffia
18 comments, 1699 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Mary

by Petegiu
6 comments, 1659 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Sophie

by Eppuresoffia
11 comments, 3083 views

HI RES 16.9 MP

Shan

by Eppuresoffia
13 comments, 3664 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

Martina

by Stefanostf
7 comments, 2944 views

Imperfection

by Stefanostf
14 comments, 4384 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reading at the bar

by Petegiu
8 comments, 2137 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

Mediterranean charm

by Bigisbetter
0 comments, 5451 views

Happy Easter Monday

by Eppuresoffia
4 comments, 3420 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Louis Mendes in Brooklyn

by Matteobelletti
4 comments, 2013 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

by Eppuresoffia
8 comments, 2355 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Olympus » Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro