JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

The Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2024. The focus is done by Linear Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 759 €;

22 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-50 mm
Angle of view	83 - 31.6° (equivalent to a 24-75mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8-4.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	11 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.24 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.30x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	No
Focus	Linear Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	58 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	240 g
Dimensions	65 x 71 mm
Buy
Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Evann60

sent on March 04, 2026

Pros: Lightweight, significantly sharper and more contrasted images than its predecessors, useful focal range over the entire range.

Cons: Not stabilized, plasticky (but on the other hand it is light), rather dark at high focal lengths.

Opinion: Hard to say anything different from previous reviews... I'll try. I got it for two months new out-of-bundle at 490, I looked around but I didn't find a better offer. The list price of over 700 in my opinion is not worth it. Among the many Fuji zoom lenses and compatible with similar focal lengths, the most sensible comparison is with the 18-55 that it replaces in the Fujifilm catalog. I'm using it a lot with an excellent XT20 unfortunately without OIS; it is said that it was born for the 40MP of the XT50 with which it is sold in a bundle, but even on the 24MP of the XT20 the difference in sharpness with the 18-55 is not a small thing, and not only in the center but also at the edges of the frame; images with greater micro-detail and also sharper and more highlighted lines (buildings, architecture, etc.), sometimes a bit 'hard' so detailed it is. So much so that often in PP I have to slightly reduce the contrast, which I don't do with the other lenses. The colors are vivid and faithful as from Fujifilm, compared to the 18-55 perhaps a little more flare but nothing compared to the 15-45 (which costs a third). The real shame is that for 70 grams less, 240 against 310, compared to the 18-55 it loses stabilization, what did it take to put it? There is even on the 15/45 which costs and weighs very little. Did they remove it to induce the purchase of stabilized models? Also this 16-50 is fairly cheap to build. Being also a bit dark at 50mm (4.8 against 4.0 to 55 of the other) without a tripod the danger of micro-blur is there and you often have to raise the ISO even in broad daylight. In short, pros and cons but if what matters most are the images, this 16-50 objectively takes better photos than the 18-55, the 15-45 (of course) and beats it with the 10/24 F4 which remains one of the best X-mount zooms ever. But for my use (landscapes, architecture) the 16-50 focal length is more usable and in fact while deprecating the absence of OIS and owning these other 3 lenses that have it, lately I use almost only it. I recommend it without reservation only if paid new from 500 downwards otherwise it is better to look elsewhere. I gave him 9 because there is no 8.5. PS Rereading myself maybe I was too strict but I couldn't try it at its best on machines with OIS and more megapixels, that is from the X-S10 upwards.

Pamar5

sent on January 12, 2026

Pros: Compact and light, solid, tropicalized, very good performance, it does not stretch when zoomed in.

Cons: Continuous diaphragm ring that can be easily touched unintentionally

Opinion: I have owned this zoom for about 4 months, bought used. Its compactness and low weight are immediately evident. The construction is good and gives an idea of solidity. Positive is the fact that it does not lengthen with the zoom and that it is tropicalized. It is not a super bright prime zoom. The f2.8, the maximum aperture, is preserved only at the wide-angle end. At f16.5 it already closes a hair at f2.9. At 18 mm it closes to f3.0, at 24 mm f3.4, at 35 mm we are already at f3.9, at 40 mm f4.3 and at 50 mm we arrive at f4.8. Nothing dramatic, knowing their behavior. For daytime photography or in non-dark conditions it performs well. The performance, in my opinion, is good on the entire excursion, even at bright apertures. Used on the road, it proved to be very versatile and as mentioned comfortable and practical to carry around due to weight and size. If you want for general excursions, he alone could be enough for the range of excursions covered. However, it also has some negative points, for example it happens to me to involuntarily move the ring of diaphragms which is continuous, without wanting or realizing it, because I find it quite smooth. This sometimes led me to disable it and use a dial on the camera body. Perhaps the unintentional operation also depends on its small size, because this problem did not occur to me with larger zooms with a ring of the same type. Mark

Preben Elkjaer

sent on July 05, 2025

Pros: Image quality even at 40MP, lightness and bulk, AF, 2 mm less wide-angle side (16) than the old one, build quality, WR, 58mm filter like many other Fuji lenses (23, 33, etc.)

Cons: Maybe the price if you take it not in kit: but the optics are really good.

Opinion: It is the classic travel zoom or excursion equivalent of a 24-75 on FF: therefore an all-rounder. Lightweight (240 grams), compact (the barrel does not lengthen by changing focal length), well built, water resistant, it has an image quality capable of easily withstanding 40 MP, where the previous 18-55 now suffered a bit. If you don't need the fixed 2.8, this is the right lens for your needs. The AF is fast and accurate; the very detailed image on the 40 sensor also allows for rather generous crops; Decent flare resistance. A lens without any particular weaknesses, as pointed out by "Lenstip" (trusted site) and also the test of Juza himself. The advice is to take it in a kit, or mismatched from a kit, because it costs much less. One final note: the 58 filter is the same as many other Fuji lenses (23 1.4, 33 1.4, etc.): which is a convenience and cost advantage.

Sigmarco

sent on July 05, 2025

Pros: Image quality, lightness, construction, magnification, autofocus, size

Cons: Price, if taken new. The internal zoom could be closed by a front lens (perhaps)

Opinion: It is the perfect travel and trekking lens for those looking for practicality without sacrificing quality. It covers all useful focal lengths from true wide-angle to mid-telephoto, and thanks to the digital crop on the 40MP of the X-T50 it virtually reaches a 24-105 equivalent, maintaining more than decent files. Sharp, compact, well-built and weather resistant, it also allows excellent close-ups without the need for a dedicated macro lens. It's not a forum zoom or pixel peeper, but it's the one that really makes you leave the house with only one lens and zero regrets. The only two "flaws" are a new price that could discourage you, but there are so many used ones separated from kits and then a suggestion: perhaps the internal zoom (very smart in my opinion), could have been covered by a front lens and avoid dust infiltration. WR will also be seeing it like this, but it doesn't really give me maximum confidence. In any case, a (not so much) kit zoom, really well made.

Robertob89

sent on November 17, 2024

Pros: Overall quality, internal zoom, weight, focal range, compactness, wr

Cons: Soft edges at some apertures and focal lengths but all in all acceptable with some workaround (crop, etc.)

Opinion: Bought on dayone free from a kit at € 499 for jumping from x-t30 II to x-t5 and to be sure to have a lens that could decently solve the 40mpx without spending a fortune. Price/Optimal performance although it is not a "PRO" lens I would not worry about using it in professional contexts, especially if used at intermediate apertures where it does not look bad even against double-cost lenses. It can satisfy even pixelppers if we neglect some edge behaviors at certain apertures but it is an acceptable compromise for the figure and the lens of use. I use it mainly for street together with the Fuji XF 27mm 2.8 II WR and I am satisfied with it.

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Chiang Rai's White Temple

by Juza
44 comments, 8109 views

HI RES 40.3 MP

Storm over the Pacific Ocean

by Juza
37 comments, 5792 views

HI RES 38.3 MP

A spectacular sunset over Wat Arun

by Juza
20 comments, 4428 views

HI RES 38.5 MP

Wat Khao Tao

by Juza
12 comments, 4330 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

The red canoe

by Juza
17 comments, 5399 views

HI RES 21.5 MP

Stormy sky in Sukhothai

by Juza
18 comments, 3928 views

HI RES 38.0 MP

Fish in the temple pond

by Juza
13 comments, 3498 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Sunset on Koh Phangan

by Juza
5 comments, 3019 views

HI RES 37.5 MP

Lanterns in Sukhothai

by Juza
5 comments, 2913 views

HI RES 35.6 MP

Reflection in Sukhothai

by Juza
10 comments, 2594 views

HI RES 34.3 MP

Prayer among the murals, Koh Phangan

by Juza
10 comments, 3327 views

HI RES 26.4 MP

Wat Arun at night

by Juza
8 comments, 2424 views

HI RES 38.9 MP

The Lights of Amphawa

by Juza
4 comments, 3710 views

HI RES 22.4 MP

Wat Arun, colors of the sunset

by Juza
8 comments, 2046 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

White Temple, Chiang Rai

by Juza
10 comments, 2902 views

HI RES 38.2 MP

Skyscrapers in Bangkok

by Juza
7 comments, 2111 views

HI RES 38.2 MP

Sunset on Koh Phangan

by Juza
9 comments, 2445 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Before dawn, from the summit of Monte Nero

by Juza
17 comments, 1776 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Chiang Rai White Temple in hi-key

by Juza
9 comments, 2970 views

HI RES 25.3 MP

The little boat in the blue of the ocean

by Juza
7 comments, 2327 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Fish dance, White Temple

by Juza
3 comments, 2356 views

HI RES 10.8 MP

Sunrise on Wat Arun

by Juza
5 comments, 2310 views

HI RES 39.5 MP

Sukhothai, among ruins and flowers

by Juza
6 comments, 2290 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Wat Arun and Chao Phraya

by Juza
3 comments, 1533 views

HI RES 38.5 MP

Wat Amphawan Chetiyaram

by Juza
1 comments, 3036 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

The Red Door

by P.a.t 62
35 comments, 909 views

HI RES 33.2 MP

Amphawa, the village on the water

by Juza
1 comments, 2819 views

HI RES 38.2 MP

Desenzano

by P.a.t 62
28 comments, 1412 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
27 comments, 1045 views

HI RES 36.6 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
40 comments, 693 views

HI RES 22.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
33 comments, 1022 views

HI RES 15.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Milky Way and Andromeda

by Juza
9 comments, 1638 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Krampus in Codroipo (UD)

by Matteo Venturini
14 comments, 596 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
21 comments, 932 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
21 comments, 1109 views

HI RES 39.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
20 comments, 598 views

HI RES 33.6 MP

High-altitude lakes

by Andrea900
28 comments, 1122 views

HI RES 22.6 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Fujifilm » Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR