JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR : Specifications and Opinions

The Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR is a supertele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2022. The focus is done by Linear Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1799 €;

19 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.

Specifications
Focal lenght	150-600 mm
Angle of view	10.8 - 2.7° (equivalent to a 225-900mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	APS-C
Max. aperture	f/5.6-8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	24 elements in 17 groups
Min. focus distance	2.4 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.24x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Linear Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1605 g
Dimensions	99 x 314 mm
Buy
Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

The Italian Maker

sent on March 29, 2024

Pros: Price, weight, internal movement, fast and quiet AF, works with extended, good sharpness (for focal length)

Cons: Bezel a bit hard after 400mm, few selector switches, usable only during the day

Opinion: Excellent lens, with a surprising weight and size to be internal movement, tropicalized, stabilized. The L-shaped bracket already arcaswiss is convenient. Very fast, responsive and above all silent AF (tested with X-H2). I found colors and sharpness pleasant, the contrast is missing but it is corrected in post, it is not very engraved but it is easy to recover with Topaz AI (especially on birds where the improvement on plumage is resounding) the weight is very good for the type of lens (but being only for asp it is simpler). The very small diaphragm is the big limitation of this lens, if the light conditions are not optimal it forces you to go up a lot with the iso and working on APSC sensors the noise is more evident. The good thing is that the stabilizer is very efficient, so if the subject is stationary, you can stay lower with use and shoot slower without too much risk of blur. we have talked about it in more depth on our YouTube channel Theitalianmaker if you have the pleasure of learning more about this focal length.

Rinowildlife

sent on February 09, 2024

Pros: TA sharpness, internal zoom, AF speed, lens pan and balance, arcaswiss foot, weight

Cons: Lack of stabilizer selector, distance scale selector makes little sense, blurry

Opinion: I've been using this lens for about a year on XH2-XH2s cameras. Purchased mostly to make up for the need to multiply the 100-400 and for the internal zoom, which in my opinion is very performing in the BIF. Starting with the construction, it is well made, soft aperture ring at the right point, large zoom ring, great weight distribution and balance. It's quite solid, but you don't get the same perception of solidity as the 200f2 which turns out to be more solid and sturdy. The weight is a significant plus, swinging 900mm equivalent with only 1.6kg is no small thing, especially for birdlife in flight which makes tracking and tracking operations easier. This, alas, requires you to have a closed aperture (F8) with consequent always high ISO, often over 1600-2000 even in broad daylight. The sharpness is already high at TA, there is no need to close further, and even with subjects at a distance (air and light conditions permitting) you take home excellent detail. The AF speed is high thanks to the linear motor, combined with XH2s the lock on to the subjects is quick, this is an excellent combination for BIF. The arcaswiss foot made is beautiful, it can be removed very comfortably and of adequate length also for use as a carrying handle. Coming to the cons, the lack of the stabilizer selector is annoying, it requires you to use a dedicated button on the machine for the function, or enter the menu, or even create custom C1-C7 memory banks with stabilization active to speed up. The distance selector of maf has a range that does not make sense on a lens of this type, considering that it has the minimum distance of maf at 2.5m, the 5m-infinity step is too long, it was ideal 10m-infinity precisely for birds in flight. The quality of the blur is excellent, creamy and pleasant, but I included it among the cons as the detachment of the subject from the background due to the F8 aperture is not always clear, it is more difficult to isolate the subject in many situations. In conclusion, it is a very interesting and well-made lens for nature photography, you have 900mm that can be used for different subjects but especially birdlife. Unfortunately it doesn't shine in brightness and if you shoot often at dawn and dusk you end up with ISO too high for my taste. If I want to buy a single telephoto for nature in the Fujifilm panorama, I think the 100-400 is more suitable for the role of all rounder, with the possibility of covering more situations, this 150-600 is more oriented towards the BIF. Fujifilm is still waiting for a fixed bright long telephoto to come up with.

Sergio Dlg

sent on March 02, 2023

Pros: Finish, tropicalization, sharpness at all apertures, speed af, focus preset, internal zoom, quick release plate with profiles for Swiss ark system, low weight, adequate price

Cons: Basically nothing, unless you want to attribute the lack of a fixed telephoto diaphragm aperture, which however would discount other dimensions and weights, objectively reducing its use only to fixed positions and / or the use of tripods. Not to mention the huge price differences (we are talking about an f4 of equal capacity a cost of 5/6 times that of the fujinon.

Opinion: After a few weeks of use I got an idea about the undisputed qualities of this lens, the first of which is the sincerity of the project. Let me explain: as universally recognized I also find its excellent build quality, so as to make me amazed that someone may have qualified it as "plastic". Also brilliant is the quick release system of the tripod bracket, moreover with swiss ark mount, the best ever for operational use. The internal zoom is then a top-of-the-range choice, as well as the various buttons for the autofocus preset. It is a very sharp lens with good light conditions and perfectly calibrated for the use for which it was designed. As rightly observed by those who preceded me, the technology currently applicable in the photographic field shows objective limits, so we can not expect that at the maximum focal length (we are talking about 900 mm on APSC), which corresponds to 8 as a diaphragm, can give the maximum in the absence of adequate light, even if modern sensors are more permissive in terms of ISO sensitivity and the camera bodies much better stabilized. The comparison with the 100-400 (which I used for years) is then merciless in favor of the more modern "biancone": sharper on all focal lengths, 200 mm of greater "range", faster AF and better balance due to the internal zoom, especially if mounted on camera bodies equipped with battery grip. In a nutshell, a lens that keeps everything it promises. Well done Fujifilm!

Evil_Jin

sent on February 23, 2023

Pros: Weight, internal zoom, af speed, finish, full aperture sharpness, tripod collar

Cons: new price, not F4

Opinion: I would have liked to pronounce myself more in the trying it even more but I read so many minchiate in the last review that I felt compelled to express my opinion about the lens in question. As construction the finishes are premium, the plastics used and the painting are from top models, just see the video during assembly worthy of a top-of-the-range red badge lens. The tripod bracket is very comfortable, when needed it loosens and takes off to continue photographing freehand. It's F8, you know before buying it you don't find out any time after, if you want to shoot in the dark without raising the iso is the wrong lens, I thought it was an obvious thing to report but it seems not. Compared to the 100-400 of which I had 3 copies in the past the construction is on higher levels, also as precision of zoom ring and focus, not to mention that the first has the barrel completely in plastic not really premium, more similar to the 70-300. As sharpness on a 40 mega pixel body there is no comparison in favor of this biancone. There are focus keys on the front, very convenient when used to return to a preset focus point. I use it on XH2 and as an autofocus it is fast and responsive, much more than on the 100-400. Obviously if you want the top performance better use it with an H2s. For me it is the definitive solution for birds in good light but now with the new cameras and denoising programs I do not see great problems to use it in most of the outputs, as long as you know what you are doing. I had the 200-500 nikon that I used on both D500 and D800 and it was an excellent zoom but bulkier and no better in terms of sharpness and versatility and it wasn't even tropicalized, I would never go back. I repeat for me it is an excellent lens for what it is, a relatively light super zoom to use more by hand than on tripods, I did not notice chromatic aberrations or purple fringe. Anyway I recommend it, on the used now is also reasonably priced . Hello everyone

Ferorake

sent on February 22, 2023

Pros: excellent sharpness, internal zoom (but now they have all zoommons)

Cons: dark, plastic, pachydermic AF on pre-xtrans5 bodies

Opinion: What can I say, total disappointment. Pulled out of the box, I immediately heard "cra", lifting it up. Settling noises of the body, which to define it plasticous is to say little. If it didn't say Fuji, I would have serenely thought of some Sigma lens from the early 2000s. I understand it does not belong to the professional series (although the cost of € 2000), but really, here we are at really mediocre levels. The Fuji 100-400 for example is another galaxy. For heaven's sake I do not doubt that the white color helps not to dilate in particularly hot environments, I do not doubt the weight that has gained, but here it is all plastic, at this point I buy a Tamron ... As image quality we are, you will split "the hair" to be honest, but unfortunately F8 feels and also a lot, and although the focal range is a lot on aps-c, at intermediate distances the blur is not rewarding, and you will always tend to work at 500 \ \ 600mm. When the light goes down you will not take pictures, you want for the opening, you want for the focal range, you want for the yield at high periclitante iso of the Fuji bodies, you want many things that sincerely make me think: at this point it is not convenient to buy a used d500 and a 200-500? I leave for last then the sore button, that is the autofocus, absolutely unsuitable and insufficient on pre-xtrans 5 bodies. Used on Xt-3 it was better to stay at home, in fact it accompanied me for a single outing before ending up on the market. Probably the usability on a body like the xh-2 is different, but does it really make sense to invest figures of this kind with all the competition there is? For heaven's sake, this zoom is definitely a welcome addition to Fuji's lens park and will make many people happy in the future, but right now it is a lens that needs a TOP body to be used, which for other brands it is not. Even on "entry level" bodies it is possible to enjoy the "zoommons" with pleasure, with sometimes questionable limits compared to the flagships with super-luminous canvases attached. The Sony 200-600 was mentioned, but I used it serenely with an a7r2, decidedly old body, without missing a beat. Clearly with the A9 it was another thing, but the shots were possible to take home even with the old a7r2, which I often did. With the xt-3 and the 150-600 instead, I really found myself going back and forth to photograph static subjects, a torture that made me return home after a few minutes.

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR

The season of love

by DanieleR
10 comments, 2360 views

Great Grebes

by Sergio Dlg
24 comments, 2621 views

HI RES 22.0 MP

Moon 1 08 2023 + background

by Matt_stairs_
11 comments, 2255 views

HI RES 22.7 MP

Untitled Photo

by Sara Stojkovic
9 comments, 2380 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Particular meal

by Mizio
8 comments, 905 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

Moon July 26, 2023

by Matt_stairs_
7 comments, 1953 views

HI RES 13.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

"Big game" hunting

by Mizio
8 comments, 638 views

HI RES 9.7 MP

Grey squirrel

by Raffaele72
0 comments, 2374 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

Starling in the garden

by DanieleR
8 comments, 1306 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Purple heron

by Pierino64
12 comments, 2301 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Kingfisher in cleaning

by Enrico Maggi
5 comments, 630 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Moon 3D

by Matt_stairs_
9 comments, 1263 views

HI RES 25.0 MP

Little bittern

by Enrico Maggi
6 comments, 122 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Always watch your back...

by Pierino64
12 comments, 1036 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Larus ridibundus

by Zook
13 comments, 227 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Grey heron

by Roberto Pasquino
2 comments, 2353 views

HI RES 9.3 MP

Passer domesticus

by Zook
10 comments, 224 views

HI RES 17.8 MP

Queen's Falcon

by Rinowildlife
6 comments, 898 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Great White Heron

by Roberto Pasquino
16 comments, 1414 views

Cygnus olor

by Zook
10 comments, 456 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

3-2-1 Landing!

by Rinowildlife
0 comments, 1057 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Larus ridibundus

by Zook
6 comments, 203 views

HI RES 7.6 MP

Grey Heron in flight

by Enrico Maggi
6 comments, 313 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

Morpho...

by Pierino64
9 comments, 824 views

HI RES 39.8 MP

SOOC jpg

by Raffaele72
2 comments, 1506 views

HI RES 10.0 MP

Larus ridibundus

by Zook
11 comments, 403 views

HI RES 7.9 MP

Sample Fujifilm XF 150-600mm @ 600mm

by JuzaPhoto Samples
0 comments, 3458 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Larus ridibundus

by Zook
5 comments, 455 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Garganey

by Massimo Di Mauro
16 comments, 669 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Thunderbird

by Rinowildlife
4 comments, 736 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Microcarbo pygmaeus

by Zook
5 comments, 609 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Tim00
2 comments, 384 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

Glossy ibis

by Massimo Di Mauro
10 comments, 468 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Passer domesticus

by Zook
5 comments, 112 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Hoopoe

by Dettofatto
7 comments, 378 views

Phalacrocorax carbo

by Zook
5 comments, 438 views

HI RES 6.5 MP

Young Eagle

by Pierino64
8 comments, 1593 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Fujifilm » Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR

Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Fujifilm XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR